Most intolerant poster in the forums?

[KillerPollo]

Who is the most intolerant, narrow-minded, islamic terrorist-like snob in the forums?

Richius, NixonNow, Opebo... anyone else?

[KillerPollo]

Red opebo has always insulted people on a semi-regular basis.

including me.

[KillerPollo]

same here... Fags are filthier than dogs.

and How does that make me intolerant? ms. feminist?

[KillerPollo]

would Cosmo Kramer, also fit into this category?

[KillerPollo]

By Opeo standard I amk an "intolerant". But then again, most people are by his standards.

Yes, PBrunsel, you are an intolerant.

By contrast I am the foremost advocate of tolerance on this board - hence my constant remonstrating against the ideology of intolerance (religion).

Hahahaha. Foremost advocate. Prove it, prude.

I like all forms of sexuality and 'approve of' any and all private behaviours.  Also I hate anyone who doesn't have a similarly tolerant attitude.

You hate people? Well, you're an intolerant just like anyone else, then. And if you so arrogantly affirm that you approve of all private behaviours, religion falls into 'private' behaviour, prude.

No, it doesn't.  It includes such statements as 'right', 'wrong', 'sin', and various condemnations of others for their private acts.  In other words it makes the claim of the existence of an objective morality.  Therefore any tolerant person should hate them, or at least dispassionately feed them to the lions.

It's private behaviour, prude. If you were tolerant of everything, you would be tolerant of religion too. So I can only conclude that you are an intolerant prude.

I smell Hypocrisy!

[KillerPollo]

By Opeo standard I amk an "intolerant". But then again, most people are by his standards.

Yes, PBrunsel, you are an intolerant.

By contrast I am the foremost advocate of tolerance on this board - hence my constant remonstrating against the ideology of intolerance (religion).

Hahahaha. Foremost advocate. Prove it, prude.

I like all forms of sexuality and 'approve of' any and all private behaviours.  Also I hate anyone who doesn't have a similarly tolerant attitude.

Hahahahahahaha... in defending your tolerance you declare that you hate anyone who disagrees with your views.

I have no words.

Tolerance doesn't require that we accept the intolerant. 

Let's check the definition of "tolerant":

tolerance
1. adj.    a. Disposed or inclined to tolerate or bear with something; practising or favouring toleration.

No, I'm fairly sure that not tolerating absolutely everything you don't like makes you intolerant.

Pwnd!

[KillerPollo]

By Opeo standard I amk an "intolerant". But then again, most people are by his standards.

Yes, PBrunsel, you are an intolerant.

By contrast I am the foremost advocate of tolerance on this board - hence my constant remonstrating against the ideology of intolerance (religion).

Hahahaha. Foremost advocate. Prove it, prude.

I like all forms of sexuality and 'approve of' any and all private behaviours.  Also I hate anyone who doesn't have a similarly tolerant attitude.

Hahahahahahaha... in defending your tolerance you declare that you hate anyone who disagrees with your views.

I have no words.

Tolerance doesn't require that we accept the intolerant. 

You aren't being tolerant of intolerance, opebo. That's not tolerance.

One cannot be tolerant of intolerance, everett, without thereby being intolerant - in other words abetting and aquiesing to intolerance.

Ok if you do not tolerate the opinions of a close-minded individual, than you're also intolerant.
Intolerant does not always mean close-minded.

[KillerPollo]

And yet one inevitably finds oneself opposed to and in disagreement with those who disapprove of things and believe in objective morality.  A paradox!

How is that a paradox?  If you're tolerant, you tolerate things.  If you don't tolerate things, you're intolerant.  You don't tolerate things, therefore, by defintion, you're intolerant.

Being tolerant means that you accept and tolerate the fact that people around you hold opinions that you disagree with and find distasteful.  You don't have to agree with them; you just have to tolerate them. 

Ah, but you see I do tolerate them on an intellectual level.  I only want them slaughtered by lions because of the practical threat the represent, due to their intolerance.  In other words, I'm arguing self defence, not objective morality.

Wanting people killed doesn't seem like tolerance to me, you intolerant prude.

*sits back and eats popcorn*

wow! just wow! opebo is getting helplessly ass-raped

[KillerPollo]

As Everett just tagged me, I'm in for this round.

opebo - you show yourself to be intolerant to the nth degree with your stances against anyone who doesn't agree with you. You just don't believe you're being intolerant because they disagree with you. In reality, you're an extremely hate filled person, even for those you claim to speak for.

Opebo is a repressed hatemonger.

[KillerPollo]

As Everett just tagged me, I'm in for this round.

opebo - you show yourself to be intolerant to the nth degree with your stances against anyone who doesn't agree with you. You just don't believe you're being intolerant because they disagree with you. In reality, you're an extremely hate filled person, even for those you claim to speak for.

No, Jake, I hate them for their intolerance.  

hate of intolerants = intolerance.

[KillerPollo]

*bumpity bump*

Hey HERE's the intolerant thread for you guys to flame on!