Bush may sidestep Congress on Bolton for U.N. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:32:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Bush may sidestep Congress on Bolton for U.N. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bush may sidestep Congress on Bolton for U.N.  (Read 6011 times)
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


« on: July 25, 2005, 05:34:56 PM »

All Bush has needed to do for a vote is hand over some documents.  Since he is so scared of making the documents public & to let the senate  see them, he is going to pull this crap??  Real Nice.  Things could get real ugly if he pulls this
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2005, 06:01:05 PM »

But he could no doubt find a somebody who would take exactly the same course of action and be confirmed easily.  That's why I say it's more of a personal issue with Bush not wanting to lose to congress than Bolton being irreplaceable.

Dude, wake up!  This country is at war and the outcome is not a given.  Yet, the Dems see Bush as more of a threat than our enemies!

The Dems in the Senate wouldn't even allow a vote on Bolton.  Now, if the Dems want to try to prove Bolton was unacceptable to the Senate, then they can allow an up or down vote on Bolton as soon as the August recess is over.

George Bush is as fault for not having a vote.  It was this easy, provide the documens you get the vote.  Bush for some reason (probably due to the damaging stuff that was in those documents) chose the path of ultimate secrecy yet again & refused to release relevant documents regarding his appointment, so their was no vote.  The fault of having no vote lies in the hand of Bush.  & the reason he probably didn't release the documents is probably that stuff in those documents were damaging and could have caused some Republicans who were teetering to be against the nomination.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2005, 08:59:08 PM »

George Bush is as fault for not having a vote.  It was this easy, provide the documens you get the vote.  Bush for some reason (probably due to the damaging stuff that was in those documents) chose the path of ultimate secrecy yet again & refused to release relevant documents regarding his appointment, so their was no vote.  The fault of having no vote lies in the hand of Bush.  & the reason he probably didn't release the documents is probably that stuff in those documents were damaging and could have caused some Republicans who were teetering to be against the nomination.

So why would Bush want Bolton if any reasonable person would look at these documents and conclude Bolton is a wacko?

Because Bolton is idealogically the same as Bush

Bush had no reason to release the documents other than their is stuff in there he didn't want to be known to the public or the Senate
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.