Iowa is Rubio Country

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

This timeline:

The Good: Very spectacular in detail
The Bad: Very apparent in hackery

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

This timeline is objectively overly optimistic (on the part of UWS)=, President Rubio would not be this popular; he would not accomplish this much; he would not have pushed Mark Kirk or Michael Bennett over the line in their Senate Races, he would not have won New Jersey or New Mexico, Ralph Northam still would have won.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Hackery is strong.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

IA-08 : Mark Jacobs (R) defeats Dave Loebsack (D)

what?!?!

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

>67 Republican Senate seats

what a dystopia.

Even worse than our time line.

I would much rather have Trump as president than 67 Republican senators.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

>67 Republican Senate seats

what a dystopia.

Even worse than our time line.

I would much rather have Trump as president than 67 Republican senators.

What a sore loser you are, Solid4096. It's his timeline so stop busting his b**ls.

In this timeline, thanks to President Rubio's competent leadership, America is safer, stronger and more prosperous. We are better of than we were four years ago.

And you created duplicate accounts just to insult people who criticize your timelines, and to make your timeline seem more popular than it actually is?

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

The Senate passed 67-30 a bill to put a police officer in every public school?! Wow, can't believe that got such huge support

UWS gave the Republicans 67 Senate Seats with his 2018 midterms. Such a hack.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

CNN Anchors & Panel at the Republican National Convention 2020 in Las Vegas

described

- The first two Days of the RNC as very successful for the President
- gave the FLOTUS an A+ Rating for her Speech last Night
- John King replied "No" when he was asked if Senator Sanders had a chance in November
- In Anticipation of VP Haley's Speech tonight CNN Analyst Gloria Borger deems the Speech as the most important in Haleys Political Career quote:

"She needs to strike the right tone in between supporting the President and introducing herself into a wider Audience as such opportunities are very rare. She stood mostly in the background of President Rubio during the last 3 1/2 years since the Republican majority in both houses of Congress is very strong. His Presidency was thus far a pretty unusual one as usually the VP is often sent to Capitol Hill to make deals with Congressional Leaders. That was not the case here as Republican Leaders in Congress notably Speaker Ryan & Senate Majority Leader McConnell introduced the Bipartisan Bills to the Democrats. Haley is just 48 years old and will be a Major Contender for the 2024 Republican Nomination should she chose to run".

- CNN Election Anchor Wolf Blitzer announced during the RNC that Election Night 2020 will be his last one and he will hand over the Keys to Anderson Cooper & Jake Tapper.
- CNN also announced that Senior White House Correspondent Jim Acosta will serve as Political Analyst after the 2020 Presidential Election alongside Gloria Borger. He will be replaced by Michelle Kosinski at the White House.
- Brianna Keilar will serve as Congressional Correspondent alongside Dana Bash.

Uh think you forgot to switch accounts.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

I had a feeling this was gonna happen again.

That's not what you think. You know, as you can see by clicking on the link below, I have myself made posts in New Tennessean Politician's timeline titled The Bi-Partisan Era of Politics because he asked me to do it for speeches. So we are all different persons

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=287945.0

And this is proof you are different people how?

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

UWS instantly jumps up to a tier of hacks higher than any other on the forum if he thinks that Republicans could avoid a Democratic Wave in 2022 in this timeline.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Mods pls ban UWS.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

MassGuy, your antics are childish. If you have a problem with this timeline, don't read it! No one wants to see your clutter.

Calling MassGuy's post clutter while this timeline is almost fifty pages of incredibly drawn out nothingness. But you have a blue avatar so I'm not surprised.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

MassGuy, your antics are childish. If you have a problem with this timeline, don't read it! No one wants to see your clutter.

Calling MassGuy's post clutter while this timeline is almost fifty pages of incredibly drawn out nothingness. But you have a blue avatar so I'm not surprised.

If you look since the very beginning, there are also Atlas members with red avatars who are liking this timeline. So I don't think you have any idea of what you're talking about. This is not a matter of ideology.

That was before the hackery in the timeline went off the deep end.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

So this is a new rule on this board posted/announced by a moderator. Just posting it here to give people a heads up in case they did not read the sticky thread at the top of the board since I do not want people to get moderated posts for that sort of stuff on this timeline. Anyways, this will be my last post on this thread.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Glenn in Colorado is a complete crazy. There is no way he would ever win at a point where Democrats are not getting completely blownout through the nation.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Can people please trim quotes of UWS timeline updates when responding to individual parts of the update to just the part relevant to ones reply?

Its really annoying to have to scroll through the entire text of an update duplicated through quotes considering that people already just saw it a few posts back.