Flynn Agrees to testify in exchange for Immunity
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:37:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Flynn Agrees to testify in exchange for Immunity
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Flynn Agrees to testify in exchange for Immunity  (Read 4236 times)
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: March 31, 2017, 10:03:32 AM »

EnglishPete should be hired by the White House Press office for real.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: March 31, 2017, 10:15:32 AM »

EnglishPete should be hired by the White House Press office for real.

besides showing far more effort than those clowns there, hs is also much better at not shooting himself in the foot every 2 seconds.

Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: March 31, 2017, 10:27:48 AM »



BREAKING: Senate Intel Cmte turned down Flynn's request, via lawyer, to be granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for testimony.

https://twitter.com/PeterAlexander/status/847828272645885952
Logged
yankeesfan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,148
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: March 31, 2017, 10:51:23 AM »

Adam Schiff‏Verified account
@RepAdamSchiff

Adam Schiff Retweeted Donald J. Trump
The public should learn a lot more about WHY General Flynn wants immunity when Sally Yates testifies before the House Intelligence Committee
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,129
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: March 31, 2017, 11:05:42 AM »



BREAKING: Senate Intel Cmte turned down Flynn's request, via lawyer, to be granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for testimony.

https://twitter.com/PeterAlexander/status/847828272645885952
Uh oh
Logged
EnglishPete
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,605


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: March 31, 2017, 11:16:02 AM »

Adam Schiff‏Verified account
@RepAdamSchiff

Adam Schiff Retweeted Donald J. Trump
The public should learn a lot more about WHY General Flynn wants immunity when Sally Yates testifies before the House Intelligence Committee
Recent pics of Sally Yates preparing to testify before the committee



Logged
EnglishPete
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,605


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: March 31, 2017, 11:19:58 AM »

EnglishPete should be hired by the White House Press office for real.

besides showing far more effort than those clowns there, hs is also much better at not shooting himself in the foot every 2 seconds.



I take that as sort of compliments, thanks.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,129
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: March 31, 2017, 11:23:11 AM »

Live shot of English Pete:
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,061
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: March 31, 2017, 11:30:01 AM »

Adam Schiff‏Verified account
@RepAdamSchiff

Adam Schiff Retweeted Donald J. Trump
The public should learn a lot more about WHY General Flynn wants immunity when Sally Yates testifies before the House Intelligence Committee
Recent pics of Sally Yates preparing to testify before the committee









You are being beyond childish.
Logged
EnglishPete
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,605


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: March 31, 2017, 11:51:32 AM »

Adam Schiff‏Verified account
@RepAdamSchiff

Adam Schiff Retweeted Donald J. Trump
The public should learn a lot more about WHY General Flynn wants immunity when Sally Yates testifies before the House Intelligence Committee
Recent pics of Sally Yates preparing to testify before the committee









You are being beyond childish.
A Democrat/Obama political hack prepares to 'testify' with 'a lot' of 'information' in this obviously cooked up witch hunt. After her blatantly partisan grandstanding in January any 'testimony' she makes needs to be taken not just with a pinch of salt but with a big wheelbarrow of salt. Anyone who expects to find her testimony credible is either extremely naive or a Democratic partisan hack.
Logged
EnglishPete
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,605


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: March 31, 2017, 12:35:55 PM »

Adam Schiff‏Verified account
@RepAdamSchiff

Adam Schiff Retweeted Donald J. Trump
The public should learn a lot more about WHY General Flynn wants immunity when Sally Yates testifies before the House Intelligence Committee

Also for anyone asking why Flynn has asked for immunity before testifying here's a preview pic of Adam Schiff preparing to question Flynn without him having any such immunity



and here's a preview pic of Schiff questioning Flynn

Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: March 31, 2017, 12:51:17 PM »

Is EnglishPete actually Sean Spicer? Certainly seems like it.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,336
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: March 31, 2017, 01:05:03 PM »

Is EnglishPete actually Sean Spicer? Certainly seems like it.

I assumed he was a Russian bot Tongue
Logged
EnglishPete
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,605


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: April 01, 2017, 11:36:40 AM »

His lawyer confirmed it Pete god you are getting desperate
I know what his lawyer said, I just posted his lawyer's statement a few posts up and it matches exactly what I've been saying for some time about this. Here it is again in case you missed it.



You will notice that it doesn't mention the words 'immunity' or 'FBI' either. A House intelligence Committee spokesman has said they have no deal with Flynn about him testifying to them.
Hi. Lawyer here. That last sentence literally just means, "We're asking for an immunity deal." Whether congress is interested in taking him up on his offer is another matter entirely.

Thinking about this if they've already had discussions with the Congressional committees about this matter and said to them that he won't be answering their questions without an immunity promise then that would mean that he already knows that they'd turned down the idea. Which means that he won't be answering their questions for the above given reasons. He's not asking for an immunity deal, he's just saying he won't testify without one.

That means of course that if he's summoned he'd have to plead the fifth to all their questions. Now the optics of that won't look good on that so he has to preemptively get his explanation for doing so that supporters in the media and politics have the explanation ready for any 'spin battle' after the hearing.

Trump's lawyers have presumably worked out the same thing about the Flynn statement which would be why Trump tweeted out his support for Flynn's given reasons for doing so so that he's got that on record for his supporters and defenders ready for when they're asked about Flynn pleading the fifth.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,652
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: April 01, 2017, 02:03:52 PM »

Can always send the CIA or FBI to take him out after we get the incriminating evidence if it's as bad as we all think.
Logged
EnglishPete
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,605


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: April 01, 2017, 03:42:34 PM »

Can always send the CIA or FBI to take him out after we get the incriminating evidence if it's as bad as we all think.
Take him out? Take him out for what?

The lack of mention of the FBI in the letter is a big indication that he hasn't requested immunity. If he was wanting 'a deal' he would presumably make such an offer to the FBI. If, on the other hand, what's happened is his lawyer has advised him to shut up and not answer any questions for the reasons given above then the reference to the Congressional committees makes sense.

He doesn't need a big public statement to explain if he's not answering any questions from the FBI. If, on the other hand he's concerned he might be called to testify before Congressional committees and is worried about looking stupid pleading the fifth to question after question then he might want a public statement to get his explanation for doing so in first.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.243 seconds with 12 queries.