Congressional Special Elections Results Thread (OLD, PLEASE UNSTICKY)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:56:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Congressional Special Elections Results Thread (OLD, PLEASE UNSTICKY)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 ... 69
Author Topic: Congressional Special Elections Results Thread (OLD, PLEASE UNSTICKY)  (Read 200636 times)
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1400 on: February 26, 2018, 05:40:54 AM »

Any over/under predictions on the Republican primary turnout?  On the one hand, Republican intensity is said to be way down, on the other hand there are 12 Republicans running for the nomination, even if a few of them are pretty fringy.  (It presumably still all adds up.)
Logged
Jeppe
Bosse
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,806
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1401 on: February 26, 2018, 11:38:28 AM »

Any over/under predictions on the Republican primary turnout?  On the one hand, Republican intensity is said to be way down, on the other hand there are 12 Republicans running for the nomination, even if a few of them are pretty fringy.  (It presumably still all adds up.)

Debbie Lisko is probably the frontrunner after Montenegro’s sexting scandal.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1402 on: February 27, 2018, 11:05:32 AM »

Good luck to Westbrook!
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1403 on: February 27, 2018, 12:28:28 PM »

Any over/under predictions on the Republican primary turnout?  On the one hand, Republican intensity is said to be way down, on the other hand there are 12 Republicans running for the nomination, even if a few of them are pretty fringy.  (It presumably still all adds up.)

Debbie Lisko is probably the frontrunner after Montenegro’s sexting scandal.

Maybe... depends on how many early votes he rolled up.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,531
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1404 on: February 27, 2018, 12:30:44 PM »

Any over/under predictions on the Republican primary turnout?  On the one hand, Republican intensity is said to be way down, on the other hand there are 12 Republicans running for the nomination, even if a few of them are pretty fringy.  (It presumably still all adds up.)

Debbie Lisko is probably the frontrunner after Montenegro’s sexting scandal.

Maybe... depends on how many early votes he rolled up.

I thought I read somewhere that estimates about 80% of the total vote could be the early vote.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1405 on: February 27, 2018, 12:48:47 PM »

Updated the OP with basic information about the election. Results can be found here: http://results.arizona.vote/#/federal/5/0 . The NYT should have a page up closer to poll closing time.

Please be aware that even though polls close at 9 ET, results will be delayed for 1 hour under state law. The earliest we could see initial numbers is 10 ET.
Logged
Cactus Jack
azcactus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,956
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1406 on: February 27, 2018, 02:32:50 PM »

A bullet-points summary of the Republican primary for those who don't know and/or have an interest, sticking to the three most prominent candidates:

  • Debbie Lesko: The "sane" choice despite her loyalty to the Branch Trumpidian. An idiot, but nuanced enough to avoid trouble and not turn the GE into another PA-18.
  • Steve Montenegro: Insane. Kooky-dukes, in the words of Dwayne Johnson. Arpaio's guy. Already smacked with one scandal before the election had even really started, this guy is a walking explosion in a skeleton factory.
  • Bob Stump: An opportunistic "college Ayn Randian" type who changed his name to cash in on former Congressman Bob Stump. No chance in Hell, but he's noteworthy for being the only major candidate to loathe Trump.

I'm putting my money on Montenegro winning the primary, because the AZGOP has lost absolutely all control in its collective life.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,793


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1407 on: February 27, 2018, 03:26:43 PM »


I'm putting my money on Montenegro winning the primary, because the AZGOP has lost absolutely all control in its collective life.


It would be absolutely hilarious if this ends up happening. For reference,the Democratic Party has never been really competitive in this part of the west valley, and the closest thing to a base is the small bits of Glendale in the south. Hell, Arpaio won the seat even as he was loosing in a landslide. But, if Montenegro becomes the candidate off of his banked early vote, this will be the third federal election (AL, PA-18) where the GOP sent a dead red seat into the competitive zone do to candidate quality.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1408 on: February 27, 2018, 07:05:40 PM »

NYT Page: https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/arizona-house-special-election-primary
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1409 on: February 27, 2018, 09:14:21 PM »

Polls have closed, but no results until 10 ET under state law.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1410 on: February 27, 2018, 09:37:02 PM »

Polls have closed, but no results until 10 ET under state law.
Well that's a dumb law.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,703


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1411 on: February 27, 2018, 09:39:16 PM »

Polls have closed, but no results until 10 ET under state law.
Well that's a dumb law.

What's the reasoning behind it, if anyone knows?
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1412 on: February 27, 2018, 09:42:33 PM »

C'mon Monty!
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1413 on: February 27, 2018, 09:47:12 PM »

Polls have closed, but no results until 10 ET under state law.
Well that's a dumb law.

What's the reasoning behind it, if anyone knows?

Probably something to do with not influencing anyone who is still in line when polls technically close.
Logged
Webnicz
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 498
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1414 on: February 27, 2018, 09:49:19 PM »

Polls have closed, but no results until 10 ET under state law.
Well that's a dumb law.

What's the reasoning behind it, if anyone knows?

It's to encourage voters to stay in line after the polls close. If a candidate is "leading" and a voter is still in line after the polls close, the voter may feel like they don't have to vote and get out of line. And vice versa, if a candidate is leading a voter does not like they can either stay in line and be more encouraged to vote, or it could discourage them from voting swell depending on they type of mindset the person has.

Its a law that drives us election junkies insane, but its a rather good one.
Logged
Webnicz
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 498
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1415 on: February 27, 2018, 10:08:56 PM »

Lesko leading with 23,621 (36%)

Montenegro in second with 15,884 (24%)

Loves very close behind 15,283 (23%)
Logged
Webnicz
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 498
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1416 on: February 27, 2018, 10:11:12 PM »

For the Dems

TIPIRNENI - 20,121    /    (59%)

WESTBROOK - 14012    /    (41%)


Turnout for Dems at 31.55%

For GOP turnout around 35.52%
source
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1417 on: February 27, 2018, 10:19:25 PM »

ALL EARLY VOTE

Democratic Primary

CANDIDATE   VOTE   PCT.   
Hiral Tipirneni
20,121   58.9%   
Brianna Westbrook
14,012   41.1   
<1% reporting (0 of 143 precincts)

Republican Primary

CANDIDATE   VOTE   PCT.   
Debbie Lesko
23,621   36.0%   
Steve Montenegro
15,884   24.2   
Phil Lovas
15,283   23.3   
Bob Stump
3,665   5.6   
Clair Van Steenwyk
1,565   2.4   
Christopher Sylvester
1,274   1.9   
David Lien
1,141   1.7   
Richard Mack
824   1.3   
Mark Yates
742   1.1   
Chad Allen
707   1.1   
Brenden Dilley
633   1.0   
Stephen Dolgos
318   0.5   
<1% reporting (0 of 143 precincts)
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1418 on: February 27, 2018, 10:26:05 PM »

NYT calls D primary:

Democratic Primary

CANDIDATE   VOTE   PCT.   
Hiral Tipirneni
20,121   58.9%
   
Brianna Westbrook
14,012   41.1   
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1419 on: February 27, 2018, 10:32:53 PM »

Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1420 on: February 27, 2018, 10:36:50 PM »

The fact that Westbrook got 41% means Laura Moser and other weak #resistance candidates are extremely likely to win in D primaries. Panic time for Democrats hoping to retake the house.
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1421 on: February 27, 2018, 10:40:43 PM »

I'm not even trolling. She got outspent 10:1 by Hiral. She has no right to be getting 41%. There are going to be some awful candidates winning in Democratic primaries.
Logged
Roronoa D. Law
Patrick97
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1422 on: February 27, 2018, 10:49:21 PM »

I'm not even trolling. She got outspent 10:1 by Hiral. She has no right to be getting 41%. There are going to be some awful candidates winning in Democratic primaries.
Given Democrats track record of not choosing risk candidate I doubt it.
Logged
Doimper
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1423 on: February 27, 2018, 11:08:47 PM »

Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1424 on: February 27, 2018, 11:15:28 PM »

not a great result for dems tbh
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 ... 69  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 11 queries.