Gnosticism, or mainstream Catholic/Orthodox/Anglican/Protestant Christianity? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:35:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Gnosticism, or mainstream Catholic/Orthodox/Anglican/Protestant Christianity? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which do you: like better / identify with better / feel rings more "true" / seems more compassionate?
#1
Gnosticism
 
#2
mainstream Catholic/Orthodox/Anglican/Protestant Christianity
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 38

Author Topic: Gnosticism, or mainstream Catholic/Orthodox/Anglican/Protestant Christianity?  (Read 4100 times)
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,056
United States


« on: April 16, 2017, 05:33:46 PM »

Which do you: like better / identify with better / feel rings more "true" / seems more compassionate?

And why?
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,056
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2017, 09:00:00 PM »

Yeah.


Gnosticism was "cool" for like a year or two after the Da Vinci Code came out, and it was interesting to discover this old strange offshoot. But there's really not much there, and very pretentious and arrogant, with many Gnostics thinking they're being deep and so enlightened when really everyone else sees them as shallow. They can be like the emo teen going on about how "no one knows what it feels like" when everyone does.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,056
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2017, 08:34:31 PM »

I guess Greatest I am has no valid defense of Gnosticism...
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,056
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2017, 10:04:12 PM »

IMO once you demote God from an utterly transcendent, omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent entity to a mere being among other beings, you undermine the best reasons to believe in God in the first place.
You should believe in what you think is true... not play "Make-A-God"
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,056
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2017, 10:55:31 PM »

IMO once you demote God from an utterly transcendent, omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent entity to a mere being among other beings, you undermine the best reasons to believe in God in the first place.
You should believe in what you think is true... not play "Make-A-God"

I agree. That's sort of the point. What reason is there to think a God who is a mere being actually exists?

God could be incredibly powerful, knowing, etc... but not this infinite magic power/knowledge level.

Some could call the state of the universe as evidence.

But the point is, if we learn at the moment of death what God's true nature is, and it's almost exactly what you thought, but not omnipotent or omniscient... wouldn't you still follow God and call God "God"? Do you love God, or do you love power and knowledge?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.