MI Governor 2018
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 01:54:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MI Governor 2018
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
Poll
Question: MI Governor 2018
#1
Gretchen Whitmer
 
#2
other Democrat
 
#3
a Republican
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 181

Author Topic: MI Governor 2018  (Read 19246 times)
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: April 15, 2018, 07:34:32 PM »

This is going to be a repeat of NJ-Gov 2017, only with an even more lopsided margin of victory.
Why do you think Whitmer is going to win by such a large margin? I don't see any reason to think that she'll outdo Obama '08 or even do as well as him.
Logged
Ohioguy29
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 532


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: April 15, 2018, 07:48:23 PM »


Lol totally false. Take a look at the 2016 primary map sometime; Ohioans from almost all counties across the state, from Appalachia, from the big cities, from the Mahoning Valley all joined together to vote against him (and it's not like Hillary is very well liked.) Anecdotally, almost no older adults I know like him, and even many young people are like "too liberal" or "he's a socialist" (and these aren't Republicans.) Populism works here, but it's gotta be the right kinda populism. His policies were less an issue than his image/branding (although being anti-fracking doesn't play well in Ohio at all if we're being honest.)
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,119
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: April 15, 2018, 07:50:36 PM »


Lol totally false. Take a look at the 2016 primary map sometime; Ohioans from almost all counties across the state, from Appalachia, from the big cities, from the Mahoning Valley all joined together to vote against him (and it's not like Hillary is very well liked.) Anecdotally, almost no older adults I know like him, and even many young people are like "too liberal" or "he's a socialist" (and these aren't Republicans.) Populism works here, but it's gotta be the right kinda populism. His policies were less an issue than his image/branding (although being anti-fracking doesn't play well in Ohio at all if we're being honest.)

Thank you for saying this. This is why I never bought the idea that he would somehow easily win the industrial midwest in the general election just because both he and Trump are "anti-establishment populists."
Logged
Ohioguy29
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 532


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: April 15, 2018, 08:14:23 PM »


Lol totally false. Take a look at the 2016 primary map sometime; Ohioans from almost all counties across the state, from Appalachia, from the big cities, from the Mahoning Valley all joined together to vote against him (and it's not like Hillary is very well liked.) Anecdotally, almost no older adults I know like him, and even many young people are like "too liberal" or "he's a socialist" (and these aren't Republicans.) Populism works here, but it's gotta be the right kinda populism. His policies were less an issue than his image/branding (although being anti-fracking doesn't play well in Ohio at all if we're being honest.)

Thank you for saying this. This is why I never bought the idea that he would somehow easily win the industrial midwest in the general election just because both he and Trump are "anti-establishment populists."

(Former) Democrats were switching parties to vote for Trump in the Republican primary. If Bernie was so dang appealing they wouldn't have done that. I'm pretty populist myself and I didn't like him much; he seemed out of touch with Ohio values. I will say 2018 Bernie is much better than 2016 Bernie, but he still doesn't really "get it" even though he has good intentions and is in many ways a positive influence on the party.

Sherrod Brown has fairly similar policies to Bernie but is well liked by a broad variety of people, including many Trump voters. He focuses on jobs instead of free college and he seems like a regular Midwestern guy instead of a coastal elite. People are also convinced he's a moderate even though he's one of the most liberal senators. He strikes the perfect balance between being willing to compromise and work bipartisanly to get stuff done and standing up for his values.
.
Now Michigan, idk about them. We're similar in some ways but not exactly the same; they seem a bit less staid and conservative. My wild guess is that Bernie would've done slightly better with white voters there, but that black voter turnout would be so low that he loses there anyway. I could be wrong though. He definitely would've lost Pennsylvania regardless so it's a moot point.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,322
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: April 15, 2018, 08:34:27 PM »

Wasn't sure where else to put this and I wasn't sure a state AG race merited a new topic, but Dana Nessel has beaten Pat Miles for the AG nomination at the Michigan Dem convention. Seems like a bit of an upset, since Miles was backed by the UAW and the party establishment.

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2018/04/michigan_democratic_party_endo.html

Congrats, MI Dems.  Y’all just threw away a winnable race.
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,745


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: April 15, 2018, 09:34:29 PM »


Lol totally false. Take a look at the 2016 primary map sometime; Ohioans from almost all counties across the state, from Appalachia, from the big cities, from the Mahoning Valley all joined together to vote against him (and it's not like Hillary is very well liked.) Anecdotally, almost no older adults I know like him, and even many young people are like "too liberal" or "he's a socialist" (and these aren't Republicans.) Populism works here, but it's gotta be the right kinda populism. His policies were less an issue than his image/branding (although being anti-fracking doesn't play well in Ohio at all if we're being honest.)

Thank you for saying this. This is why I never bought the idea that he would somehow easily win the industrial midwest in the general election just because both he and Trump are "anti-establishment populists."

(Former) Democrats were switching parties to vote for Trump in the Republican primary. If Bernie was so dang appealing they wouldn't have done that. I'm pretty populist myself and I didn't like him much; he seemed out of touch with Ohio values. I will say 2018 Bernie is much better than 2016 Bernie, but he still doesn't really "get it" even though he has good intentions and is in many ways a positive influence on the party.

Sherrod Brown has fairly similar policies to Bernie but is well liked by a broad variety of people, including many Trump voters. He focuses on jobs instead of free college and he seems like a regular Midwestern guy instead of a coastal elite. People are also convinced he's a moderate even though he's one of the most liberal senators. He strikes the perfect balance between being willing to compromise and work bipartisanly to get stuff done and standing up for his values.
.
Now Michigan, idk about them. We're similar in some ways but not exactly the same; they seem a bit less staid and conservative. My wild guess is that Bernie would've done slightly better with white voters there, but that black voter turnout would be so low that he loses there anyway. I could be wrong though. He definitely would've lost Pennsylvania regardless so it's a moot point.

At this point, and contrary to what I felt several months ago, debating over whether Bernie would have won is moot point. It's like debating whether Reagan would have won had he been the nominee in 1976. With that said, polling does suggest that Bernie Sanders is the most popular major politician in the country (although Joe Biden polls better - he doesn't really constitute as a politician anymore at least he jumps in the 2020 race), and with the right conditions, is well suited to win the Midwest that Obama won twice, once with little difficulty, so to act like he's a fringe candidate lives in a bubble. 

Back on subject somewhat, is Whitmer's candidacy a dumpster fire or has she just not hit the airways yet? We can't afford to lose this race.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,322
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: April 15, 2018, 11:11:03 PM »


Lol totally false. Take a look at the 2016 primary map sometime; Ohioans from almost all counties across the state, from Appalachia, from the big cities, from the Mahoning Valley all joined together to vote against him (and it's not like Hillary is very well liked.) Anecdotally, almost no older adults I know like him, and even many young people are like "too liberal" or "he's a socialist" (and these aren't Republicans.) Populism works here, but it's gotta be the right kinda populism. His policies were less an issue than his image/branding (although being anti-fracking doesn't play well in Ohio at all if we're being honest.)

Thank you for saying this. This is why I never bought the idea that he would somehow easily win the industrial midwest in the general election just because both he and Trump are "anti-establishment populists."

(Former) Democrats were switching parties to vote for Trump in the Republican primary. If Bernie was so dang appealing they wouldn't have done that. I'm pretty populist myself and I didn't like him much; he seemed out of touch with Ohio values. I will say 2018 Bernie is much better than 2016 Bernie, but he still doesn't really "get it" even though he has good intentions and is in many ways a positive influence on the party.

Sherrod Brown has fairly similar policies to Bernie but is well liked by a broad variety of people, including many Trump voters. He focuses on jobs instead of free college and he seems like a regular Midwestern guy instead of a coastal elite. People are also convinced he's a moderate even though he's one of the most liberal senators. He strikes the perfect balance between being willing to compromise and work bipartisanly to get stuff done and standing up for his values.
.
Now Michigan, idk about them. We're similar in some ways but not exactly the same; they seem a bit less staid and conservative. My wild guess is that Bernie would've done slightly better with white voters there, but that black voter turnout would be so low that he loses there anyway. I could be wrong though. He definitely would've lost Pennsylvania regardless so it's a moot point.

At this point, and contrary to what I felt several months ago, debating over whether Bernie would have won is moot point. It's like debating whether Reagan would have won had he been the nominee in 1976. With that said, polling does suggest that Bernie Sanders is the most popular major politician in the country (although Joe Biden polls better - he doesn't really constitute as a politician anymore at least he jumps in the 2020 race), and with the right conditions, is well suited to win the Midwest that Obama won twice, once with little difficulty, so to act like he's a fringe candidate lives in a bubble. 

Back on subject somewhat, is Whitmer's candidacy a dumpster fire or has she just not hit the airways yet? We can't afford to lose this race.

Whitmer hasn’t hit the airwaves yet, she’ll be fine barring Russian meddling.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: April 15, 2018, 11:13:11 PM »

Wasn't sure where else to put this and I wasn't sure a state AG race merited a new topic, but Dana Nessel has beaten Pat Miles for the AG nomination at the Michigan Dem convention. Seems like a bit of an upset, since Miles was backed by the UAW and the party establishment.

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2018/04/michigan_democratic_party_endo.html

Congrats, MI Dems.  Y’all just threw away a winnable race.

She could be carried by the environment, but Miles was far superior
Logged
Bojack Horseman
Wolverine22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,372
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: April 15, 2018, 11:18:27 PM »

Wasn't sure where else to put this and I wasn't sure a state AG race merited a new topic, but Dana Nessel has beaten Pat Miles for the AG nomination at the Michigan Dem convention. Seems like a bit of an upset, since Miles was backed by the UAW and the party establishment.

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2018/04/michigan_democratic_party_endo.html

Congrats, MI Dems.  Y’all just threw away a winnable race.

Dana had the best platform and real experience. Pat Miles was a slimy politician who turned to Republican tactics when he couldn’t win on issues.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: April 16, 2018, 09:34:40 AM »

Wasn't sure where else to put this and I wasn't sure a state AG race merited a new topic, but Dana Nessel has beaten Pat Miles for the AG nomination at the Michigan Dem convention. Seems like a bit of an upset, since Miles was backed by the UAW and the party establishment.

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2018/04/michigan_democratic_party_endo.html

Congrats, MI Dems.  Y’all just threw away a winnable race.

Dana had the best platform and real experience. Pat Miles was a slimy politician who turned to Republican tactics when he couldn’t win on issues.

Being a former US Attorney isn’t real experience?
Logged
Jeppe
Bosse
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,806
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: April 16, 2018, 09:41:49 AM »

Good on Nessel, she’ll do fine in November. People who think she’s going to lose are being way too salty about Miles losing.
Logged
Bojack Horseman
Wolverine22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,372
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: April 16, 2018, 12:48:31 PM »

Wasn't sure where else to put this and I wasn't sure a state AG race merited a new topic, but Dana Nessel has beaten Pat Miles for the AG nomination at the Michigan Dem convention. Seems like a bit of an upset, since Miles was backed by the UAW and the party establishment.

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2018/04/michigan_democratic_party_endo.html

Congrats, MI Dems.  Y’all just threw away a winnable race.

Dana had the best platform and real experience. Pat Miles was a slimy politician who turned to Republican tactics when he couldn’t win on issues.

Being a former US Attorney isn’t real experience?

Pat Miles simply couldn't be trusted. He said he was pro-union, but he once-upon-a-time supported right to work. We're about to vote on legalizing marijuana, and Miles prosecuted medical marijuana patients in federal court. He just couldn't be trusted.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,750


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: April 17, 2018, 04:30:36 PM »

Considering how Dana Nessel implied that "all men are sexual predators", and "women are never sexual predators" in one of the dumbest campaign advertisements ever, both of which are completely false statements with numerous counterexamples, I am really annoyed that she was nominated.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,322
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: April 17, 2018, 08:11:34 PM »

Considering how Dana Nessel implied that "all men are sexual predators", and "women are never sexual predators" in one of the dumbest campaign advertisements ever, both of which are completely false statements with numerous counterexamples, I am really annoyed that she was nominated.

This, plus Pat Miles was a solid candidate.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,750


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: April 18, 2018, 01:54:03 PM »

Does Michigan not have primaries for downballot executive offices?

Because not having primaries is dumb and anti-democracy.
Logged
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #115 on: April 18, 2018, 06:36:00 PM »

Watching the Michigan Democrats throw away the AG race is fun.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,322
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #116 on: April 18, 2018, 10:46:36 PM »

Watching the Michigan Democrats throw away the AG race is fun.

Kinda like watching the Republican Party throw away both houses of Congress?
Logged
junior chįmp
Mondale_was_an_insidejob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,396
Croatia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #117 on: May 29, 2018, 12:26:04 PM »

Whitimer rolled out a pretty left-wing economic platform recently:

- $15-an-hour minimum wage
- Repealing Right-to-Work
- Free community college

http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20180529/news/661976/whitmer-economic-plan-15-an-hour-minimum-wage-repealing-right-to-work
Logged
#gravelgang #lessiglad
Serious_Username
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #118 on: May 29, 2018, 02:10:52 PM »

Thanedar spotted at a Rubio 2016 campaign event and posed with Rubio: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2018/05/24/thanedar-rubio-rally-no-crime/642027002/

Also, Kzihr Khan (of DNC fame) endorsed El-Sayed, in what is perhaps this cycle's least consequential endorsement.
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #119 on: May 29, 2018, 02:23:18 PM »

Thanedar spotted at a Rubio 2016 campaign event and posed with Rubio: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2018/05/24/thanedar-rubio-rally-no-crime/642027002/

Also, Kzihr Khan (of DNC fame) endorsed El-Sayed, in what is perhaps this cycle's least consequential endorsement.
I honestly have no idea why Thanedar is running, tbh.
Logged
Bojack Horseman
Wolverine22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,372
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #120 on: May 29, 2018, 02:32:40 PM »

Thanedar spotted at a Rubio 2016 campaign event and posed with Rubio: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2018/05/24/thanedar-rubio-rally-no-crime/642027002/

Also, Kzihr Khan (of DNC fame) endorsed El-Sayed, in what is perhaps this cycle's least consequential endorsement.
I honestly have no idea why Thanedar is running, tbh.

Because he wants attention and a platform to schmooze rich people.
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #121 on: May 29, 2018, 02:41:09 PM »

Whitimer rolled out a pretty left-wing economic platform recently:

- $15-an-hour minimum wage
- Repealing Right-to-Work
- Free community college

http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20180529/news/661976/whitmer-economic-plan-15-an-hour-minimum-wage-repealing-right-to-work

She needs to start touting this platform to all of the Trump WWC counties as well as the counties with POC this very minute if she wants to win in November.
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #122 on: May 29, 2018, 02:49:45 PM »

Whitimer rolled out a pretty left-wing economic platform recently:

- $15-an-hour minimum wage
- Repealing Right-to-Work
- Free community college

http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20180529/news/661976/whitmer-economic-plan-15-an-hour-minimum-wage-repealing-right-to-work

She needs to start touting this platform to all of the Trump WWC counties as well as the counties with POC this very minute if she wants to win in November.

Logged
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,475
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #123 on: May 30, 2018, 09:48:29 PM »

Whitimer rolled out a pretty left-wing economic platform recently:

- $15-an-hour minimum wage
- Repealing Right-to-Work
- Free community college

http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20180529/news/661976/whitmer-economic-plan-15-an-hour-minimum-wage-repealing-right-to-work


Points two and three are great. I think a $15 min wage statewide is a dumb idea but I can actually see it playing well in Michigan where laborers who went from manufacturing or resources (mining) to service work took a huge pay cut. Really curious to see how this would play out if she (or El-Sayed) won.
Logged
Senator-elect Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,726
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #124 on: June 03, 2018, 05:09:10 PM »

Likely D. Whitmer wins in a walk.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.08 seconds with 13 queries.