Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 18, 2017, 10:51:13 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderators: Beet, Apocrypha)
| | |-+  Should Representatives serve four year terms?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: -skip-
Yes. four years   -17 (50%)
No, keep two years   -17 (50%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 34

Author Topic: Should Representatives serve four year terms?  (Read 723 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4643
United States


View Profile
« on: May 19, 2017, 09:12:12 am »
Ignore

Should congress(wo)men be elected for four years? I think that two years are very short and cause them constantly to run for reelection. That makes democracy more disfunctional.

Four year terms would either eliminate midterms completely or just half of representatives would be up for election every two years. If the terms for senators aren't changed.

Thoughts?
« Last Edit: May 19, 2017, 09:22:13 am by Sir Mohamed »Logged

United Arab Emirates Immigrant, naturalized US citizen, resident of the wonderful state of California, devoted liberal Democrat. Any questions?

Endorsements:
- President: Kamala Harris
- CA Governor: Gavin Newsom
- CA Senate: Kevin de Len

- AL Senate: Doug Jones
Virginia
Virginia C
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8279
Antarctica


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2017, 12:05:17 pm »
Ignore

Wouldn't this take away the idea of a chamber that is responsive to the public (well, responsive in theory..)? Discontent with a new president allows people to put a halt to an unfavorable agenda via the House, between presidential elections. Even if we had 4 year terms of House members, it would still be better to hold their elections during midterms, imo. Though, I do agree with your rationale overall.
Logged

rbk
CrabCake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13142
Kiribati


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2017, 02:24:52 pm »
Ignore

Would make sense to shift senate terms to eight years then - then you could have them elected in two classes, which would make a lot more sense.

And yes, this would be a good thing; if you combine it with recall so you can abort particularly repellent speciemns midterm. For one it would mean congressmen don't spend more than half their term running for reelection; and for another it would mean that midterms could entirely be focused on state issues which at present are lost in the federal shuffle.
Logged

Personally, I think he should only get one testicle removed (moderate hero)
Such a solution would certainly be completely unacceptable for me. However, for the sake of moderate herosim, I might very well be willing to keep my scrotum. Smiley Indeed, does that sound fair? Smiley
A Strange Reflection
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 46345
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2017, 08:22:05 pm »
Ignore

My preferred term length for Lower Houses is three years, but four is better than two, so yeah.
Logged


"In the end, the world we live in is in darkness."
"That's why... we seek the light."

Noir, episode 26
President Johnson
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4928
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2017, 05:52:03 am »
Ignore

Yes, four years is better than two, though I like the concept of midterm-elections. And eight years for senators is definitely too long.

I would change all federal terms to the following:

- President and Vice President: 5 years (term limit: two consecutive terms for president)
- Senators: 5 years; two classes with each up for election every 2.5 years (term limit: two consecutive terms)
- Representatives: 2.5 years (term limit: four consecutive terms)

Proposed election schedule:

Nov 2010: presidential election
May 2013: midterm elections
Nov 2015: presidential election
May 2018: midterm elections
Nov 2020: presidential election
...
Logged

Pragmatic Democrat. Socially liberal, economically/fiscally moderate. Member of Germany's SPD.

Favorite president: Lyndon B. Johnson
Best president we never had: Nelson Rockefeller

Read my TL: The liberal Republic



Steve Bullock/Kamala Harris 2020
angus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17463
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2017, 11:03:27 am »
Ignore

president:  six-year term; limited to one term
US house:  four-year terms; no term limits
US senate:  abolish

Logged
LabourJersey
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 288
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2017, 08:07:46 am »
Ignore

Yes, and abolish the senate while you're at it. It would be a nice segue into a parliamentary system that would actually be equipped to govern in the 21st century, unlike the relic currently in place.
Logged
President Johnson
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4928
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2017, 12:56:22 pm »
Ignore

Yes, and abolish the senate while you're at it. It would be a nice segue into a parliamentary system that would actually be equipped to govern in the 21st century, unlike the relic currently in place.

The parlamentary system has the big disadvatage that there is too much party splitting. You got too many parties what makes it difficult to establish coalition governments. I also don't like the concept of party discipline for legislators.
Logged

Pragmatic Democrat. Socially liberal, economically/fiscally moderate. Member of Germany's SPD.

Favorite president: Lyndon B. Johnson
Best president we never had: Nelson Rockefeller

Read my TL: The liberal Republic



Steve Bullock/Kamala Harris 2020
LabourJersey
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 288
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2017, 01:43:11 pm »
Ignore

Yes, and abolish the senate while you're at it. It would be a nice segue into a parliamentary system that would actually be equipped to govern in the 21st century, unlike the relic currently in place.

The parlamentary system has the big disadvatage that there is too much party splitting. You got too many parties what makes it difficult to establish coalition governments. I also don't like the concept of party discipline for legislators.

That's not the case for a lot of countries, especially anglophone nations (UK, Australia, NZ and Malta don't have serious party splitting and normally have one party govts). I think the political psychology of Americans isn't receptive to multi-party thinking anyway, at least in the near future.
Logged
Northwest Goff
tara gilesbie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3691
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2017, 02:37:20 pm »
Ignore

It would be a nice segue into a parliamentary system that would actually be equipped to govern in the 21st century

The problem is 21st century neoliberal consensus, so making a system based around it would actually be a devolution.
Logged
Lincoln Governor Lok
lok1999
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2503
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2017, 03:05:36 am »
Ignore

Of course they should, as it gives the government more time between elections to, you know, actually do things, and even give them a bigger time frame for more long term projects.
Logged

A Liberal LGBT in one of the most pro LGBT cities in the country.

CORA IS GONE, JOIN THE DISCORD!!!
https://discord.gg/7kKvzqT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kt5q64uQ2GU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7NvF42MhCA
Proud Grumplican
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40562
Palestinian Territory, Occupied
View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 22, 2017, 07:56:53 am »
Ignore

I'd be ok with it.  It's a constant campaign for the House but maybe a couple of years of doing something instead of running again the second you get elected might be nice.

Or not.
Logged

You exemplify everything wrong and disgusting about our country.


Can we please, please not allow Grumps' staggering stupidity to derail another thread?

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines