Why did Dukakis perform so well in Wisconsin?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 03:30:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Dukakis perform so well in Wisconsin?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Dukakis perform so well in Wisconsin?  (Read 1454 times)
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 24, 2017, 07:45:00 PM »

I understand that there was a farm crisis, but Wisconsin is not as farm dependent a state as say Iowa or Montana.

Why did he win it by a relatively comfortable margin?
Logged
MIKESOWELL
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2017, 11:03:32 AM »

My guess is the late 1980s farm crisis and Democrat Herbert Kohl helping Dukakis a bit in that Senate race.
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2017, 11:16:36 AM »

WI and to a greater extent MN have a progressive tradition. Dukakis' improvement over Mondale's percentage (Mondale, despite losing WI, did relatively well there) was on par with the national trend.

I'm more curious why Clinton's percentage in WI dropped so much in 1992 compared with Dukakis' (from 51% to 41%).
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,953
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2017, 12:16:40 PM »

WI and to a greater extent MN have a progressive tradition. Dukakis' improvement over Mondale's percentage (Mondale, despite losing WI, did relatively well there) was on par with the national trend.

I'm more curious why Clinton's percentage in WI dropped so much in 1992 compared with Dukakis' (from 51% to 41%).

Perot.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,634
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2017, 12:45:02 PM »

WI and to a greater extent MN have a progressive tradition. Dukakis' improvement over Mondale's percentage (Mondale, despite losing WI, did relatively well there) was on par with the national trend.

I'm more curious why Clinton's percentage in WI dropped so much in 1992 compared with Dukakis' (from 51% to 41%).

Perot.

Yes. Clinton and the DNC's embrace of neoliberalism opened the door for Mondale/Dukakis voters in the Midwest to flee to anti-NAFTA Perot.
Logged
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,057
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2017, 01:01:18 PM »

The Populist image, which fit well with blue collar workers, especially amidst the farm crisis.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,417
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2017, 06:28:52 PM »

The Populist image, which fit well with blue collar workers, especially amidst the farm crisis.
Dukakis had a populist image?
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 03, 2017, 09:38:20 PM »

The Populist image, which fit well with blue collar workers, especially amidst the farm crisis.
Dukakis had a populist image?

Dukakis did very well for a Democrat in rural America, but was blown out of the water in suburban America. Typically rural areas like populism and suburbs not so much, see 2016.
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 03, 2017, 10:22:38 PM »

Along with the farm crisis that still affected the midwest. Dukakis gained among blue collar workers mainly in rural areas that supported Reagan strongly due to a dropoff from the 1984 landslide and a switch to the Democrats. My guess is that there was fatigue over Reagan's policies especially didnt feel that they benefited from the 1980s economic boom compared to Suburban areas despite the same areas voting for Reagan because of his appeal to social conservatism back in 1984.
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,058
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2017, 10:47:44 PM »

Interesting turnout results in Waukesha County:


1984
Mondale: 47,313
Reagan: 92,426

1988
Dukakis: 57,598
Bush: 90,467

Guess Democrats were just more likely to vote when it wasn't an obvious GOP landslide.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 11 queries.