Questioning the sanity of the electorate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:25:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Questioning the sanity of the electorate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Questioning the sanity of the electorate  (Read 3135 times)
Virginian87
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,598
Political Matrix
E: -3.55, S: 2.70

« on: August 15, 2005, 08:34:22 AM »

Exit polls have become so unreliable it's hard to trust them anymore.  Remeber how they predicted Kerry victories in Ohio?  Then again, maybe we are a nation of stupid people.  A recent study showed that only a relatively small percentage of Americans could find Iraq on a map.
Logged
Virginian87
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,598
Political Matrix
E: -3.55, S: 2.70

« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2005, 10:53:57 AM »

Pouring over some old exit polls, I came across this, from 2000's CNN poll:

13% of the population characterized Bush as being "too liberal."

Of those people, 81% (or about 11% of the overall population) voted for Gore instead.  In other words, 11% of the population thought Bush was too liberal and voted for Gore - 1 in about 9 voters.

About 1 in 256 people thought Bush was too liberal, but voted for Nader.

Thus, about 14% of Nader voters (around 1 in 7)  thought Bush was "too liberal."

Sad, sad, sad.

None of that's insane compared to voting for Bush!

HAHAHAHA!  Nice one.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.