Feminists' endorsement
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 01:10:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Feminists' endorsement
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which female candidate will get the endorsement of feminist organizations?
#1
Maria Cantwell
#2
Tulsi Gabbard
#3
Kirsten Gillibrand
#4
Kamala Harris
#5
Amy Klobuchar
#6
Elizabeth Warren
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Feminists' endorsement  (Read 1104 times)
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,374
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 27, 2017, 06:13:48 PM »

The next election will mark the first time in American history that binders full a bunch of women will seek the presidential nomination of a major party.
Which female candidate will get the endorsement of most feminist organizations?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2017, 06:17:56 PM »

That assumes all these women even run, which is doubtful.
Logged
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,374
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2017, 06:19:18 PM »

That assumes all these women even run, which is doubtful.

Are you implying that none of them will run?
Logged
The Undefeatable Debbie Stabenow
slightlyburnttoast
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,050
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -5.43

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2017, 06:35:45 PM »

I think Cantwell would get the least traction out of any of these candidates (with the lowest name recognition of the bunch), so she likely wouldn't really be prominent enough of a candidate for endorsements from major organizations. Gabbard has questionable ties to foreign leaders with human rights violations and her dad was infamously homophobic (Tulsi herself was pretty aggressively anti-LGBT in her earlier years), so I would take her out of the running too.

Klobuchar, Warren, Harris, and Gillibrand would all be liked by feminist organizations I'm sure. But Gillibrand has made fighting sexual assault a huge part of her brand (heh, heh), and I'm guessing that would be a particularly useful quality towards getting positive attention from feminist groups - so I voted for Gillibrand. Klobuchar, Harris, and Warren don't strike me as having that one issue that really defines them (except for maybe Harris w/ criminal justice and immigration reform, but that's still not to the same extent as Gillibrand w/ fighting sexual assault), and I think Gillibrand being so aggressive in this one area would help her stick out from the pack for feminist causes.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2017, 07:13:56 PM »

They either won't endorse one person, or if one candidate looks like a big favorite to win anyway, they'll endorse that candidate.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2017, 08:19:24 PM »

They either won't endorse one person, or if one candidate looks like a big favorite to win anyway, they'll endorse that candidate.


This. Or they'll endorse whichever woman candidate seems to be seriously in the running, assuming they're relatively reasonable.
Logged
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2017, 09:27:52 PM »

They'll endorse the leading centrist.

So not Warren (leftist) or Gabbard (odd ball).
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 27, 2017, 09:47:39 PM »

The G-Lizard is the most outwardly feminist of all of them. I doubt Cantwell and Gabbard are running, too.

Like others have said, no endorsements until the last lady standing.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,728
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 27, 2017, 09:55:11 PM »

Elizabeth "Nevertheless she persisted" Warren
Logged
Possiblymaybe
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 335
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 27, 2017, 10:11:24 PM »

They won't endorse anyone but feminists will gravitate towards Warren or Harris.
Logged
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,931
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 27, 2017, 10:21:26 PM »


LMAO ! Oh that was good.
Logged
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,374
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 27, 2017, 10:34:19 PM »


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B7KPRo30y4
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2017, 05:53:20 AM »

Modern American feminism has been infiltrated by the "MUH INTERSECTIONAL OPPRESSION" nuts, so I'm going to go with Harris.
Logged
maga2020
Rookie
**
Posts: 131


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: 7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 28, 2017, 01:04:51 PM »

Kamala because identity politics rule their agenda.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 14 queries.