The Hofoid House of Absurd & Ignorant Posts VII

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

So what happens if North Korea attacks Guam with ballistic missiles? And the ideology of communism will not flourish much longer on the face of the planet. Trump is doing exactly what he needs to do IMO by issuing a warning and it means he's serious about it.

enjoy getting drafted little boy

Let's hope he's the first one to go given he's so enthusiastic about it.

I have been saying it and I would be proud to serve my country to defend it at all costs.

Then go ahead and sign up...what are you waiting for cuck?

Not everyone at Atlas loves America enough to put politics aside.

I'm not a big flag-waver, but I'm an American and I pray that our President (whether you like the fact or not) will succeed in his objectives for America in this matter.

This is exactly right. It's a fight to retain our freedoms and democracy. I'll be sure to wait for you to defend us while you cower in fear. And I'd also ask if everyone on this forum could exercise a degree of political tolerance for others' political beliefs. This isn't about our leanings, it's about the safety and security of our nation among others. If you won't protect it, you are inherently un-American.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

So what happens if North Korea attacks Guam with ballistic missiles? And the ideology of communism will not flourish much longer on the face of the planet. Trump is doing exactly what he needs to do IMO by issuing a warning and it means he's serious about it.

enjoy getting drafted little boy

Let's hope he's the first one to go given he's so enthusiastic about it.

I have been saying it and I would be proud to serve my country to defend it at all costs.

Then go ahead and sign up...what are you waiting for cuck?

Not everyone at Atlas loves America enough to put politics aside.

I'm not a big flag-waver, but I'm an American and I pray that our President (whether you like the fact or not) will succeed in his objectives for America in this matter.

This is exactly right. It's a fight to retain our freedoms and democracy. I'll be sure to wait for you to defend us while you cower in fear. And I'd also ask if everyone on this forum could exercise a degree of political tolerance for others' political beliefs. This isn't about our leanings, it's about the safety and security of our nation among others. If you won't protect it, you are inherently un-American.

"If you don't agree with my perception of this situation, you aren't a real American"

Sounds about right

There are people on this forum who know who they are that would root for another nation against America in a conflict; even an existential conflict.  That they have been nurtured and suckled on the breast of American public education, and sheltered from the threats much of the world's people endure daily by America's law enforcement and military apparatus, all while enjoying personal freedoms that much of the world does not enjoy, is something they are blind to.  They have received so much from America, and yet will not even defend it verbally, let alone with their lives.  

And why?  Because America isn't perfect?  Because there was once slavery and Jim Crow?  Because they have to endure Evangelical Christians in their midst?  Because they have issues when they use public restrooms that the government won't accommodate them on?  Because they don't like Trump?   Because their real loyalty is to their own ethnic group, religious sect, or political movement, and those tribal and parochial loyalties are never transcended by duty to, and love for country?  

The Un-American spirit is the spirit of a person that will not be down with his/her country when there is an existential threat to the point of wishing success on the efforts of leaders they don't like and may not agree with.  I didn't like Bush 43 and didn't like the Iraq War, but I never rooted for our troops to fail.  That many weren't as good to Obama as that doesn't make it "American" to return the favor to Trump.  There are lots of folks here that vote, that take the benefits of America, but hate the Republic for which the flag stands (or, at best, feel indifferent to it).  I won't call you out, but you give yourselves away with your rhetoric.  I hope that maturity fixes that problem someday for a number of you.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

So...American leftists want Bernie Sanders dead?

If he was a proud, open Jew they would.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Yes because I dont believe in rewarding breaking the law. No matter who it is

So a baby who's born in Guatemala and brought to the United States by their parents is "breaking the law?"

Yes since they dont have the proper documentation, dont have permission to be here, and entered the country illegally. If my parents brought me into idk, say Japan when i was a kid, do i have the right to stay or demand that they allow me to stay?

It's not a question of rights, it's a question of morals.  You have no say where you end up as a child.  A child cannot apply for documentation.  Why should they be penalized because their parents broke the law?  In what other areas of the law do we apply this rationale?

The law requires you to be a US Citizen or have proper documentation if you want to be in this country, if you dont, tough. Under your method, the whole world would be flooding in here with their kids. Bottom line is i believe that we should cater to Americans rather than foreign nationals

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=264430.msg5845311#msg5845311

lmao what a cuck

ayy lmao

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Because she is half-black. Most of the excuses boil down to "Black women aren't as electable as a blonde white woman is" because they don't like her race. Female POC know your place behind white feminists.

These parody users really have to stop.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

He wouldn't get more than 5% in a Republican primary.  He might actually do somewhat better in a Democratic primary, where his views on eugenic abortions might be better received, considering their love for Planned Parenthood, the single most racist organization with any political influence in America.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

nation-states are obsolete.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

But what if it leads to women throwing themselves down staircases if Roe is overturned

That's on the women that throw themselves down staircases. 

People jumped out of buildings because they went from being worth paper millions to being under water, financially during the Depression.  That was on them, too. 

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

I am predicting that this "bandwagon" effect of "victims" coming out of the woodwork and accusing prominent figures of all sorts of impropriety will soon result in a backlash toward the accusers.  A number of them will be seen as attention whores and gold-diggers; classes of folks that are generally abhorred by the average person.  This will happen, in no small measure, because of the increasing demand that folks accept more and more accusations at face value, on the basis of little more than a "He said, She said".  

I am sympathetic to victims who come forward.  I am sympathetic to victims who have been legitimately intimidated into coming forward and are now coming forward.  I am especially sympathetic to victims who are being intimidated, and quickly come forth anyway.  But to say that there is no possibility that there will be a "cottage industry" of Faux Victims, hoping to cash in on the slimy (and sometimes illegal) behavior of the Spaceys, Cosbys, Weinsteins, et al, is naivete.  If we are required to take EVERY alleged victim at their word when they make allegations like this, without requiring anything resembling a standard of, proof, can literally anyone come forth against anyone and ruin anyone's career and reputation?

These situations need to be resolved by the courts and law enforcement, and not by the media.  People in America, even Hollywood (ugh) figures, deserve a presumption of innocence, and fairness in how they are dealt with.  I suppose this would only happen in a Perfect World, but that the World is imperfect doesn't mean that we shouldn't have our eyes on what the standard is.

Innocent until proven guilty is for the courts, you don’t need a conviction to make up your mind.  For example, Donald Trump, Roy Moore, Harvey Weinstein, Bill Clinton, Gary Goddard, Bret Ratner, Bryan Singer, Kevin Spacey, John Travolta, and Bill Cosby are all clearly sex predators imo even though none have been convicted of any sexual offenses thus far.  And yes, what you describe is certainly possible (but a smaller one then you’d think given that false reports make up only 6-8% of all sexual harassment/assault/rape accusations), but why is that your chief concern (apologies if I misunderstood your post btw)?  I’m more concerned about people being afraid to come forward, especially after the absolutely disgusting display we’ve seen from the AL Republican Party.

I have heard that the 6-8% stat is an example of misleading information from the left and that the true number is well over 50% (especially if you exclude legitimate misunderstandings or situations where the "victim" regretted the action later and tried to claim that they were incapable of consent on account of having had two drinks- another reason alcohol needs to be eliminated from society, but that's a different story).  Especially right now, given that it is seemingly the in-thing to do, I am going to believe the accused in each of these cases unless it is legally proven otherwise.

Also, sexual harassment as an allegation is a whole different can of worms that I honestly have a hard time ever taking seriously.  If someone says "you look good today", someone else can turn around and claim that that was sexual harassment.  If a guy asks a girl on a date who says no, what is to stop her from claiming that the ask-out was somehow a form of sexual harassment?  If someone makes a comment you don't like, kindly ask them to stop, but the first one was not "sexual harassment" when that person didn't know that you didn't want that comment.

Spacey and Weinstein were examples that seemed to have legitimacy.  All of the rest are likely just copycats at this point.  Of course the SJW feminist movement will never allow any criticism of the mountain of false allegations that is hitting all corners of this country right now.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

I probably shouldn't say this, but I do have a VERY unpopular opinion...
Viewing child porn should not be illegal, however obviously making or distributing it should be highly illegal as it already is.

Oh dear.  I don't feel safe here anymore.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

In reference to Charles Manson's death...

This is sadder than the time High Hefner died

What a year for Commiefornia. Tragic.

I mean, Manson contributed more to popular culture than Hugh Hefner ever did.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

In reference to Charles Manson's death...

This is sadder than the time High Hefner died

What a year for Commiefornia. Tragic.

I mean, Manson contributed more to popular culture than Hugh Hefner ever did.

I mean, Hugh Hefner contributed more to "not being a cult leader and having people murdered" than Manson ever did.

Hugh Hefner helped pave the path for America's decline.  The cultural scarring brought by the likes of Mr. Hefner and his kind will never fade.  Just the number of rapes which have occurred that can be indirectly attributed to the hedonistic lifestyle he promoted would number in the thousands today.

Manson was just a nut who couldn't even get his own hands dirty.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

In reference to Charles Manson's death...

This is sadder than the time High Hefner died

What a year for Commiefornia. Tragic.

I mean, Manson contributed more to popular culture than Hugh Hefner ever did.

I mean, Hugh Hefner contributed more to "not being a cult leader and having people murdered" than Manson ever did.

Hugh Hefner helped pave the path for America's decline.  The cultural scarring brought by the likes of Mr. Hefner and his kind will never fade.  Just the number of rapes which have occurred that can be indirectly attributed to the hedonistic lifestyle he promoted would number in the thousands today.

Manson was just a nut who couldn't even get his own hands dirty.

I don't even know how to respond to this honestly. My brain is going to melt if i even try to rebut this.

That is how most people feel after they read your posts, honestly.  No offense.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

In reference to Charles Manson's death...

This is sadder than the time High Hefner died

What a year for Commiefornia. Tragic.

I mean, Manson contributed more to popular culture than Hugh Hefner ever did.

I mean, Hugh Hefner contributed more to "not being a cult leader and having people murdered" than Manson ever did.

Hugh Hefner helped pave the path for America's decline.  The cultural scarring brought by the likes of Mr. Hefner and his kind will never fade.  Just the number of rapes which have occurred that can be indirectly attributed to the hedonistic lifestyle he promoted would number in the thousands today.

Manson was just a nut who couldn't even get his own hands dirty.

I understand you're hammering on the edge still, but the two emboldned ( ) lines proves you're trying too hard and some obvious cracks are showing.  How could someone contribute less to culture than Manson did (who contributed way less to culture than say, Angus Young), yet still be guilty of a "cultural scarring" hedonistic lifestyle that's lead to thousands of rapes?  That seems like a heavy effect on culture.


(and FTR, I don't believe that Hefner is guilty of things you accuse him of)

Well, think of it this way.  One of these men was a cult leader who went to prison for his crimes and died with a rich legacy in art and music.  The other man (also a cult leader) died rich and happy, without having to face a day's bit of retribution for his own crimes, and left behind a legacy that empowers men to write, well, stuff like this.

who has gotten laid more, Mr Hefner or every poster here with more than 2000 posts?

I suppose "contributes more" is of subjective interpretation here.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

"Dog whistles" are mostly a made-up term by the left to discredit conservative arguments.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Hmm... look, I know I'm supposed to be a good librul and have a good haw-haw at this sentiment.  I do think there is a lot of moral dissonance in play.  But let's imagine I'm a God-fearing Alabamian and actually, truly, honestly think that abortion is murder with all my heart.  It is killing babies.  That means that DOUG is a candidate who is publicly, unashamedly supporting laws that make it easier to commit murder.  I also know that pedophiles are bad, but given the choice between a pedophile and someone who supports murder, I might find it harder to pick one over the other, particularly because I can always convince myself that the pedophile is just an alleged pedophile and that somehow makes it better.

I mean, I believe that the morally correct attitude in this case is to (1) write someone in (but the Alabama Republican Party is not doing me any favors on this) or (2) don't vote.  But, if I put myself into a mindset where I genuinely believe that abortion is murder (which is hard, because, well, I don't)... well, things get weirder, at least.

Obviously, this doesn't excuse the Alabama Republican Party for not putting forward a write-in, nor does it imply that Trump actually doesn't believe the statement as communicated in the thread title (which he probably does, because Democrats don't say nice things about him).

AlabamaIndy is literally the only literate Alabama Republican though, so a write in is futile

Nick Saban.

Also, I agree with the double quoted sentiments here. If you truly belived abortion was murder, and therefore that pro-choice Democrats were allowing and encouraging mass murder, the view that pedophile > pro-choice candidate does make sense.

This sums up my view.  Even if Roy Moore had murdered 100 people, I would still prefer him to someone who would vote to murder 1 million people per year.  Essentially, there could be no scandal bad enough to make me even consider voting Democratic.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

lmao

Jesus Badger, delete that post before you lose your job. That's a career ender right there.

Good thing Badger is smart enough to not leave any hints of his real identity here.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Retaliation is not at all uncommon in rural or small areas where people like Moore have friends and supporters.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Anarchy is a far right wing ideology.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Retaliation is not at all uncommon in rural or small areas where people like Moore have friends and supporters.

"Retaliation" for defending oneself against abuse is no more common in rural areas than it is anywhere else.

(Liberal anti-rural bigotry is a huge peeve of mine.)

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

I don't care if you're serious or not. Electing Manning would be irresponsible and would be equivalent or possibly even worse than Roy Moore.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

White identity politics

not in 1980

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

White identity politics

not in 1980

LOL Reagan clearly told in that campaign why America needed to be made great again. He said taxes were too high, government had gotten too big, the previous administrations seemed to be helpless to deal with inflation, and America was getting pushed around by our enemies .

Reagan ran with the Nixon strategy and it worked for him.  Carter wasn't much better in his career when it came to racebaiting, though.

I dispute the notion that white identity politics* was not a factor in the 1980 election, or any other election for that matter.

*or identity politics in itself, of course

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

I never thought I would see the day when Atlas posters obsess over the stock market. Typically Atlas has zero interest in such things, and investing and so forth, in part I guess because a high percentage of posters live off their parents and the like. Yes, I know, Trump latest crime against humanity is politicizing the Dow. Shame on him!

Lol, Boomer musings.