Is there actually an Upper Midwest, or is a transmorgrification of the Upper Mississippi?
There are companies and media outlets that describe themselves as serving the Upper Midwest, and though I've heard that label most often in the region of the Upper Mississippi, I've never heard the description Upper Mississippi applied that way. I've only heard Upper Mississippi applied in the geological sense or to describe pre-Columbian cultures.
Have you ever heard the term Lower Midwest? Would someone from Kansas or
Indiana say they were from the Lower Midwest?
The North American Baptist Conference has a Upper Mississippi region (MN, IA, WI, IL).
I'm not saying that the area of the Upper Mississippi became the Upper Midwest, but the concept of "upper-ness" may have come from the river divisions, and of course there is clear distinction between Upper Mississippi and Lower Mississippi, except perhaps for the bit between St. Louis and Cairo.
538 ran a survey that agreed with my definition. Most Midwesterners agreed that the Midwest included their State and its neighbors.
Only about 10% of respondents in that
538 poll agreed that Colorado was Midwestern, as you have argued. Yet a majority of respondents put Michigan and Ohio in the Midwest, the latter of which, at least, you've argued shouldn't be considered Midwestern. The greatest percentage of respondents agreed Illinois should be included, which to me is a no-brainer, as Chicago is the largest Midwestern city.