MT-SEN: Matt Rosendale (R) tells ridiculous lies about Sen. Jon Tester (D) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:45:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MT-SEN: Matt Rosendale (R) tells ridiculous lies about Sen. Jon Tester (D) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MT-SEN: Matt Rosendale (R) tells ridiculous lies about Sen. Jon Tester (D)  (Read 1065 times)
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,723
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« on: August 22, 2017, 11:25:33 PM »

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/aug/21/matthew-rosendale/republican-senate-hopeful-claims-montana-sen-jon-t/

The fact that Rosendale has resorted to this sort of behavior just goes to show that Tester is a clear favorite to win re-election in '18.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,723
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2017, 09:29:34 AM »

Yeah, I agree with the analysis in this thread. This race is definitely Likely D now, and much closer to Safe D than Lean D. No way someone like Tester can lose, and all the Republican overconfidence here is definitely unwarranted.

Weren't you the one telling me I was too bullish on Tester in another thread? Your inconsistency is amusing.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,723
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2017, 09:50:08 AM »

Yeah, I agree with the analysis in this thread. This race is definitely Likely D now, and much closer to Safe D than Lean D. No way someone like Tester can lose, and all the Republican overconfidence here is definitely unwarranted.

Weren't you the one telling me I was too bullish on Tester in another thread? Your inconsistency is amusing.
He was being sarcastic. Seriously, you couldn't tell? Isn't that why he put the italics? I believe he's singling out people like you (without actually dropping any names) for being overconfident, as you have been about Tester for some time. Also, please name me one time where a "Pants on Fire" rating from Politifact sunk someone's campaign, because I can't think of any.

Re: Italics = Sarcasm : Eh, maybe, maybe not. Obviously it's in your best interest to latch on to any remotely possible sign of sarcasm in any pro-Tester post here, so your judgment of MT's seriousness  is unreliable.

One lie often leads to another and another and another, which can sink a campaign. Just ask Michele Bachmann.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.