If SCOTUS ruled the other way on Citizens United, would Bernie still have run?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 03:45:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  If SCOTUS ruled the other way on Citizens United, would Bernie still have run?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would Bernie have run without Citizens United?
#1
Yes, he still would have run		  
#2
No, his run was a reaction to Citizens United		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 16

Author Topic: If SCOTUS ruled the other way on Citizens United, would Bernie still have run?  (Read 496 times)
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,418
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 16, 2017, 09:34:19 PM »
If Citizens United never happened or went the other way, would Bernie still have run?
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2017, 11:37:50 PM »
Quote from: Mondale Won 1 State on September 16, 2017, 09:46:45 PM
Probably not. Citizens United is one of the worst decisions ever and that combined with gutting of the VRA is responsible for the majority of problems in US politics today. Hard to imagine he could of made much of a case w/o both of those cases
Wasn't another major part of his platform that Clinton was too corrupt and insufficiently progressive?
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,418
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2017, 02:10:52 AM »
Quote from: Heisenberg on September 16, 2017, 11:37:50 PM
Quote from: Mondale Won 1 State on September 16, 2017, 09:46:45 PM
Probably not. Citizens United is one of the worst decisions ever and that combined with gutting of the VRA is responsible for the majority of problems in US politics today. Hard to imagine he could of made much of a case w/o both of those cases
Wasn't another major part of his platform that Clinton was too corrupt and insufficiently progressive?
It was just his supporters saying that until she called him "unqualified".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.214 seconds with 16 queries.