What the hell is the point of these?
BRTD wants to show us all he's the alpha male of this internet political forum by creating a makeshift social hierarchy that mimics High School, except this time with the hierarchy inverted so he's at the top.
Alpha males don't exist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTyQgwVvYyc
The point is he's made many non-sequitor posts and posts that are objectively false and easily disproven via math.
Alpha males don't need to literally exist; see Plato's forms or Wever's ideal-type. You can still seek to be one.
Here's the thing: shouldn't women actually decide who is and isn't an alpha male?
I had always sort of assumed it was more of an observer thing; the male in question obviously can't decide that he is one, but I would think it within the purview of a male observer to label as such, assuming they can establish that he rules the pack, can easily put down fellow males--both within and outside the pack--or whatever prerequisites we want to establish. That said, a woman's perspective could be particularly useful as alpha masculinity doesn't necessarily serve a purpose if said male can't mate.
Really, the only alpha on Atlas is Dave. No wonder I gravitate toward him.
Poll
