How each election's map would look like if the PV was tied (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 12:40:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How each election's map would look like if the PV was tied (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How each election's map would look like if the PV was tied  (Read 2501 times)
60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED
ahugecat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 868


« on: October 01, 2017, 10:57:23 AM »

Wow so Trump had the most efficient EV spread of any candidate in modern US presidential history. Interesting.

That's how he was in the primaries as well.

Clinton had a million SuperPacs and a billion dollars too lmao! It's actually one of the reasons I voted for Trump - the ability to get things done with limited resources. Politicians love to waste money (as Jeb!, Sanders, and Clinton did).
Logged
60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED
ahugecat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 868


« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2017, 10:59:12 AM »

This makes me think - what the heck was Romney's path to 270?

I remember thinking the election was going to be close, but looking back at it, Romney had a 0.1% shot to win. I could see him getting to 266 (VA, OH, FL) but nothing passed that.

I remember him visiting Pennsylvania but that was like a day before the election. He tried Colorado and New Hampshire for a bit, did he even make a case in Nevada?

In 2016 Trump worked hard and focused on states early. Started hitting PA, MI, NH, NV, and FL right away.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.