Why did George McGovern win so many Massachusetts counties in 1972?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 03:19:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did George McGovern win so many Massachusetts counties in 1972?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did George McGovern win so many Massachusetts counties in 1972?  (Read 1709 times)
DPKdebator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,080
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.81, S: 3.65

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 23, 2017, 12:03:20 PM »

In 1972, George McGovern was able to win all but 5 counties in Massachusetts (Franklin, Plymouth, Barnstable, Dukes, and Nantucket all voted Republican, which pretty much constituted MA's Republican strongholds of that time), which seems pretty normal, but then it all sticks out like a sore thumb compared to all the surrounding states. All of the other traditionally Democratic-voting areas flipped, including every county in Rhode Island. Why exactly is it that so much of Massachusetts held onto the Democrats (except for Plymouth, the only county to flip) while every other stronghold flipped?
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2017, 05:00:01 PM »

Maybe because the people blamed Nixon / Republicans for so many textile jobs leaving MA and heading south. In 1972 the unemployment rate in MA was more than a full percentage point above the national average. This may explain why Boston's working class areas went for McGovern: South Boston, by 63%-37%, Somerville, by 67%-33%, Waltham, by 56%-44%, and Lowell, by 60%-39%-- areas that in any other state would be Silent Majority communities for Nixon.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,417
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2017, 03:06:18 PM »

Massechusettes has always been dovish, going all the way back the Puritans' isolationism.
Logged
Sir Tiki
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 372
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.28, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2017, 03:32:56 PM »

According to McGovern himself:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2012/10/21/george-mcgovern-indelible-mark-massachusetts-politics/DSStNzC9nxsLdmmGG3WGuN/story.html
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2017, 03:33:37 PM »
« Edited: October 06, 2017, 03:36:27 PM by ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) »

Massachusetts went for Humphrey by a big margin relative to his performance nationwide in 1968. So it might just be an effect of JFK's lasting legacy(first catholic, from massachusetts, people still remembering him after he was assassinated)



Maybe because the people blamed Nixon / Republicans for so many textile jobs leaving MA and heading south. In 1972 the unemployment rate in MA was more than a full percentage point above the national average. This may explain why Boston's working class areas went for McGovern: South Boston, by 63%-37%, Somerville, by 67%-33%, Waltham, by 56%-44%, and Lowell, by 60%-39%-- areas that in any other state would be Silent Majority communities for Nixon.


https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/rinan#0

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/manan

Yea Neighboring Rhode island swung towards Nixon heavily as their economy rebounded from the early 1970s recession by late 1971, While Massachusetts only recovered by the end of 1972. Along with the JFK legacy. McGovern was able to win Massachusetts.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2017, 04:19:15 PM »

Shriver as VP is part of the answer.

The more surprising thing is how much RI swung - more than WV, in terms of the D% vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 11 queries.