PPP: Biden and other Dems all lead Trump; Trump leads potential primary

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

How is it so close with Harris?

Because she sucks, and is the epitome of what the rust belt, and frankly lots of others rejected last year. Far lefties are just too thick to put practicality over their "purist" ideals. Maybe she might be a perfect candidate for just ideology for many democrats, and even the base, but her practically is crap. For christ sakes people, she is, and would do worse than even Hillary in America, and probably would somehow manage to even underperform Clinton in wwc territory.

It has absolutely NOTHING to do with name recognition.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

How is it so close with Harris?

Because she sucks, and is the epitome of what the rust belt, and frankly lots of others rejected last year. Far lefties are just too thick to put practicality over their "purist" ideals. Maybe she might be a perfect candidate for just ideology for many democrats, and even the base, but her practically is crap. For christ sakes people, she is, and would do worse than even Hillary in America, and probably would somehow manage to even underperform Clinton in wwc territory.

No, it's because she lacks the name recognition. Most voters barely even know she exists, they're not going to know that she's "a thick purist lefty". You can dislike her, but let's not change facts.

She votes party line about 85%, that is pretty partisan. The more people get to know about this person, the more she will flop in polls. If she is the nominee, I could envision an unlikely but possible situation in which I would favor Trump over her. For every presidential election since 1960, my theoretical vote was Safe D, in 2020, when I get a real vote, Harris would be the first person to throw me into the Likely D pile in over half a century if she were the nominee.

Honestly, your hatred for Kamala is very unrealistic.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

How is it so close with Harris?

Because she sucks, and is the epitome of what the rust belt, and frankly lots of others rejected last year. Far lefties are just too thick to put practicality over their "purist" ideals. Maybe she might be a perfect candidate for just ideology for many democrats, and even the base, but her practically is crap. For christ sakes people, she is, and would do worse than even Hillary in America, and probably would somehow manage to even underperform Clinton in wwc territory.

No, it's because she lacks the name recognition. Most voters barely even know she exists, they're not going to know that she's "a thick purist lefty". You can dislike her, but let's not change facts.

She votes party line about 85%, that is pretty partisan. The more people get to know about this person, the more she will flop in polls. If she is the nominee, I could envision an unlikely but possible situation in which I would favor Trump over her. For every presidential election since 1960, my theoretical vote was Safe D, in 2020, when I get a real vote, Harris would be the first person to throw me into the Likely D pile in over half a century if she were the nominee.

Honestly, your hatred for Kamala is very unrealistic.

Probably a little, but I just really hate her .

You don't have to like her, but to claim that her poll numbers are low because of likability is daft. Trump's poll numbers against her are about the same against every other democrat. That means her problem is name recognition. Even with low name recognition, she is still beating him which isn't good news for the President.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

Interesting how Gillibrand is the only one driving down Trump's numbers. May be that my claim that she is the most electable democrat is correct!

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

There is literally no reason to hate Harris. She's the future of the Democratic Party.