PPP: Biden and other Dems all lead Trump; Trump leads potential primary (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:17:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  PPP: Biden and other Dems all lead Trump; Trump leads potential primary (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP: Biden and other Dems all lead Trump; Trump leads potential primary  (Read 2287 times)
Possiblymaybe
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 335
« on: September 28, 2017, 08:11:51 PM »

Interesting that Gillibrand is the only Dem to push Trump into the sub-40 range, despite presumed lack of name recognition. Wonder if there's any significance.

Definitely interesting, surprised her name recognition is so low compared to booker. She's been in the senate a lot longer than him.
Logged
Possiblymaybe
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 335
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2017, 08:14:14 PM »


Because she sucks, and is the epitome of what the rust belt, and frankly lots of others rejected last year. Far lefties are just too thick to put practicality over their "purist" ideals. Maybe she might be a perfect candidate for just ideology for many democrats, and even the base, but her practically is crap. For christ sakes people, she is, and would do worse than even Hillary in America, and probably would somehow manage to even underperform Clinton in wwc territory.
She's a moderate neoliberal, not a leftist like Warren or Sanders.
Not according to her voting record. She rates in the top 3 most progressive senator on all sites that monitor ideology based on voting record.
Logged
Possiblymaybe
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 335
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2017, 09:27:35 AM »

There is literally no reason to hate Harris. She's the future of the Democratic Party.

She did deny a trans woman medical care in prison. I'd hate for that to be the future of the party.
Someone in another thread said people would never vote for her because of her uber liberal LGBT stance. Now you're saying she's isnt progressive enough on LGBT to be the future of the party? Lol this is confusing.. 
If you're referring to the case where her lawyers argued the state shouldn't pay for gender reassignment for a felon then Elizabeth Warren said exactly the same thing.
https://jezebel.com/5941540/elizabeth-warren-opposes-sex-reassignment-surgery-for-transgendered-inmate
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.