It's not just that, it's that they praise bad decisions like Paris withdrawal and ditching regulations while simultaneously claiming that they are educated. Spoiled brats most likely.
It's not an issue of contrasting opinions, it's an issue that not all opinions are equal or valid/sound. In my opinion the twin ideas that 'people are entitled to their opinion' and 'all opinions are equal' is the most destructive idea to emerge from the concept of egalitarian democracy.
I agree with Isaac Asimov on this:
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”
I suppose one can argue over whether the Paris Accord is the best way to address Anthropogenic Global Warming (Climate Change) but there is no credible argument opposing the reality of anthropogenic global warming (climate change.)
