Should the CDC be permitted to study gun violence?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 01:19:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Should the CDC be permitted to study gun violence?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Should the CDC be permitted to study gun violence?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Should the CDC be permitted to study gun violence?  (Read 1329 times)
Wakie77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 352
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 06, 2017, 08:34:37 AM »

Currently the CDC is not permitted to study gun violence the way it studies automotive accidents.  This is due to a 1996 budget amendment passed by Congress and pushed by the NRA forbidding such studies.

Would you support overturning that amendment?  Discuss why or why not?
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,811
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2017, 09:40:03 AM »

Centers for DISEASE Control should stick to studying diseases. NIOSH is largely a waste of money that could be better spent on real science. Malaria research > useless reports on how kids who accidentally shoot themselves are more likely to die from gun violence than kids who do not.
Logged
Don Vito Corleone
bruhgmger2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,268
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2017, 09:44:06 AM »

If, as you say, the CDC studies automotive accidents, I don't see why it would be wrong for them to study gun violence.
Logged
Wakie77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 352
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2017, 09:53:00 AM »

If, as you say, the CDC studies automotive accidents, I don't see why it would be wrong for them to study gun violence.

https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/motor-vehicle-safety/index.html
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4818a1.htm

Yes, the CDC studies it.  The result has been rational laws and safety measures which drastically reduced injuries and deaths related to automobiles.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2017, 10:34:29 AM »

If, as you say, the CDC studies automotive accidents, I don't see why it would be wrong for them to study gun violence.

https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/motor-vehicle-safety/index.html
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4818a1.htm

Yes, the CDC studies it.  The result has been rational laws and safety measures which drastically reduced injuries and deaths related to automobiles.
Logged
Cashew
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,566
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2017, 11:16:01 AM »

They had their chance and they blew it.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/12/why-we-cant-trust-the-cdc-with-gun-research-000340

Give them a single inch, and they will restart the campaign to have gun owners treated like smokers. Nobody can call them impartial with a straight face.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,169
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2017, 11:24:27 AM »

They had their chance and they blew it.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/12/why-we-cant-trust-the-cdc-with-gun-research-000340

Give them a single inch, and they will restart the campaign to have gun owners treated like smokers. Nobody can call them impartial with a straight face.


     One of the things I hate most about the issue of gun control is the ludicrous amounts of advocacy qua research published on both sides of the debate. Finding actual, solid work on the subject is extremely hard to do among the seas of bias.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,433
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2017, 08:12:11 PM »

No, and they shouldn't be able to study smoking, vaping, drinking during the day, drinking as a teenager, dropping out of school, biking without a helmet, playing on a playground, being unsupervised as a child, or having sex as a teenager either.
Logged
AtorBoltox
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,042


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2017, 09:20:52 PM »

No, and they shouldn't be able to study smoking, vaping, drinking during the day, drinking as a teenager, dropping out of school, biking without a helmet, playing on a playground, being unsupervised as a child, or having sex as a teenager either.
What is this garbage? None of these activities are remotely equivalent to gun violence
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,433
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2017, 09:35:49 PM »

No, and they shouldn't be able to study smoking, vaping, drinking during the day, drinking as a teenager, dropping out of school, biking without a helmet, playing on a playground, being unsupervised as a child, or having sex as a teenager either.
What is this garbage? None of these activities are remotely equivalent to gun violence
My point is that they shouldn't be able to study anything for which it would serve a moral or political agenda to produce certain results.
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 06, 2017, 09:57:16 PM »

Centers for DISEASE Control should stick to studying diseases. NIOSH is largely a waste of money that could be better spent on real science. Malaria research > useless reports on how kids who accidentally shoot themselves are more likely to die from gun violence than kids who do not.
America is suffering an epidemic of gun violence. On average, a Mandalay Bay's worth of people kill themselves with a gun every day. Another 25 are killed by someone else with a gun.
Logged
longtimelurker
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 835


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 06, 2017, 10:08:37 PM »

Centers for DISEASE Control should stick to studying diseases. NIOSH is largely a waste of money that could be better spent on real science. Malaria research > useless reports on how kids who accidentally shoot themselves are more likely to die from gun violence than kids who do not.

Excuse me, but you don't know what NIOSH does.  I make my living as an environmental scientist working at hazardous waste sites.  NIOSH sets the standards for hard hats, respirators, and numerous other safety equipment.  Maybe you don't think that bullets are harmful, but trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene and the numerous other chlorinated solvents, heavy metals, and hydrocarbons that I've worked around for more than the past 10 years sure are.
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2017, 02:57:11 AM »

They had their chance and they blew it.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/12/why-we-cant-trust-the-cdc-with-gun-research-000340

Give them a single inch, and they will restart the campaign to have gun owners treated like smokers. Nobody can call them impartial with a straight face.

The US is literally the only country that faces this level of gun deaths.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2017, 03:07:25 AM »
« Edited: October 07, 2017, 03:11:50 AM by Adam T »

Preventing the CDC from researching/studying gun violence is right wing political correctness.  

I'm sure there are more technical points that could be made here, and while I realize the CDC isn't a university, all of the arguments presented here against allowing them to study it are the same arguments made by those who the right refers to as 'politically correct' when those 'politically correct' people try and prevent academics from researching/studying certain things.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2017, 03:13:16 AM »

Preventing the CDC to research/study gun violence is right wing political correctness. 

I'm sure there are more technical points that could be made here, and while I realize the CDC isn't a university, all of the arguments presented here against allowing them to study it are the same arguments made by those who the right refers to as 'politically correct' when those 'politically correct' people try and prevent academics from researching/studying certain things.

So far as I can tell, the solution that the NRA has for gun violence is... even more guns.
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,811
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 07, 2017, 10:18:42 AM »
« Edited: October 07, 2017, 10:20:15 AM by Mr. Reactionary »

Centers for DISEASE Control should stick to studying diseases. NIOSH is largely a waste of money that could be better spent on real science. Malaria research > useless reports on how kids who accidentally shoot themselves are more likely to die from gun violence than kids who do not.

Excuse me, but you don't know what NIOSH does.  I make my living as an environmental scientist working at hazardous waste sites.  NIOSH sets the standards for hard hats, respirators, and numerous other safety equipment.  Maybe you don't think that bullets are harmful, but trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene and the numerous other chlorinated solvents, heavy metals, and hydrocarbons that I've worked around for more than the past 10 years sure are.

EPA/DOL/NIST/OSHA can't do that?
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,811
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 07, 2017, 10:29:52 AM »

Centers for DISEASE Control should stick to studying diseases. NIOSH is largely a waste of money that could be better spent on real science. Malaria research > useless reports on how kids who accidentally shoot themselves are more likely to die from gun violence than kids who do not.
America is suffering an epidemic of gun violence. On average, a Mandalay Bay's worth of people kill themselves with a gun every day. Another 25 are killed by someone else with a gun.

Epidemic. Noun. A widespread occurrence of an infectious disease in a community at a particular time.

Gun violence is not a disease. CDC should stick to infectious diseases.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,414
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 07, 2017, 11:47:16 AM »

No, and they shouldn't be able to study smoking, vaping, drinking during the day, drinking as a teenager, dropping out of school, biking without a helmet, playing on a playground, being unsupervised as a child, or having sex as a teenager either.
What is this garbage? None of these activities are remotely equivalent to gun violence
My point is that they shouldn't be able to study anything for which it would serve a moral or political agenda to produce certain results.

So then they shouldn't be able to study anything then.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 07, 2017, 11:58:08 AM »

No, and they shouldn't be able to study smoking, vaping, drinking during the day, drinking as a teenager, dropping out of school, biking without a helmet, playing on a playground, being unsupervised as a child, or having sex as a teenager either.

They should absolutely study vaping. Sh#t's gotta go.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,433
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2017, 01:00:36 PM »

No, and they shouldn't be able to study smoking, vaping, drinking during the day, drinking as a teenager, dropping out of school, biking without a helmet, playing on a playground, being unsupervised as a child, or having sex as a teenager either.
What is this garbage? None of these activities are remotely equivalent to gun violence
My point is that they shouldn't be able to study anything for which it would serve a moral or political agenda to produce certain results.

So then they shouldn't be able to study anything then.
There's plenty of things for them to study where there wouldn't be such an agenda. For example, chicken pox.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,433
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 07, 2017, 01:04:23 PM »

No, and they shouldn't be able to study smoking, vaping, drinking during the day, drinking as a teenager, dropping out of school, biking without a helmet, playing on a playground, being unsupervised as a child, or having sex as a teenager either.

They should absolutely study vaping. Sh#t's gotta go.
I'd rather the people who want to incarcerate teenage vapers for destroying their developing brains with nicotine not have "science" on their side.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 07, 2017, 01:09:21 PM »

No, and they shouldn't be able to study smoking, vaping, drinking during the day, drinking as a teenager, dropping out of school, biking without a helmet, playing on a playground, being unsupervised as a child, or having sex as a teenager either.

They should absolutely study vaping. Sh#t's gotta go.
I'd rather the people who want to incarcerate teenage vapers for destroying their developing brains with nicotine not have "science" on their side.

Omelette, eggs, etc.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 07, 2017, 02:28:33 PM »

NOVA once had a program in which it treated murder (much of it committed with firearms) and found murder strongly correlating to poverty and low levels of formal education.  Even regional and ethnic differences (South versus New England, black versus white)  reduced the differences to poverty and formal education.

 
Logged
longtimelurker
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 835


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 07, 2017, 07:25:19 PM »

Centers for DISEASE Control should stick to studying diseases. NIOSH is largely a waste of money that could be better spent on real science. Malaria research > useless reports on how kids who accidentally shoot themselves are more likely to die from gun violence than kids who do not.

Excuse me, but you don't know what NIOSH does.  I make my living as an environmental scientist working at hazardous waste sites.  NIOSH sets the standards for hard hats, respirators, and numerous other safety equipment.  Maybe you don't think that bullets are harmful, but trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene and the numerous other chlorinated solvents, heavy metals, and hydrocarbons that I've worked around for more than the past 10 years sure are.

EPA/DOL/NIST/OSHA can't do that?

These contaminants cause diseases, most notably cancer.  The CDC is the most logical agency to make and enforce these regulations.
Logged
longtimelurker
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 835


Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 07, 2017, 07:27:32 PM »

Centers for DISEASE Control should stick to studying diseases. NIOSH is largely a waste of money that could be better spent on real science. Malaria research > useless reports on how kids who accidentally shoot themselves are more likely to die from gun violence than kids who do not.
America is suffering an epidemic of gun violence. On average, a Mandalay Bay's worth of people kill themselves with a gun every day. Another 25 are killed by someone else with a gun.

Epidemic. Noun. A widespread occurrence of an infectious disease in a community at a particular time.

Gun violence is not a disease. CDC should stick to infectious diseases.

Oxford English Dictionary:

1.1. A sudden, widespread occurrence of an undesirable phenomenon.
‘an epidemic of violent crime’

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/epidemic
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 15 queries.