SENATE RESOLUTION: End of War Agreement (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:17:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE RESOLUTION: End of War Agreement (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE RESOLUTION: End of War Agreement (Passed)  (Read 1667 times)
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,535
Vatican City State


« on: October 09, 2017, 10:41:05 PM »

(Admittedly I already knew about the story behind the photo; I just used it because it's easily recognized.)

But I changed the photo. Smiley

The changed photo is an improvement anyway Wink
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,535
Vatican City State


« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2017, 11:13:39 PM »

Fantastic that we have an agreement drafted already. The biggest thing here I would change is how that $1.5 billion donation is divvied up. While all parties have certainly been harmed in the conflict, I would rather see more of that aid go towards both North and South Korea, who have been disproportionately affected far more than China has. I'll propose the following amendment on that note:

It's also worth noting that China provided significantly more soldiers than we did, was actively involved in combat for longer, and also suffered major losses in some of the more recent battles of the war.

Edit: Also North Korea is receiving aid from the China agreement. So this donation isn't the only source.
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,535
Vatican City State


« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2017, 01:53:05 AM »
« Edited: October 10, 2017, 02:23:10 AM by President fhtagn »

Fantastic that we have an agreement drafted already. The biggest thing here I would change is how that $1.5 billion donation is divvied up. While all parties have certainly been harmed in the conflict, I would rather see more of that aid go towards both North and South Korea, who have been disproportionately affected far more than China has. I'll propose the following amendment on that note:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

After discussing with China, they're willing to agree with Spiral's proposed amendment as long as the donation amount changes, which I proposed above (in red).

Which I personally think works out fine since it's still more aid going towards the countries that need it most.

So if Scott wants to do his thing, there it is Tongue
Logged
fhtagn
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,535
Vatican City State


« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2017, 08:16:36 PM »

Is there any reason for us to think North Korea will be able to pay the reparations? That part reminds me of the Treaty of Versailles, which was a monumental fail.

North Korea will Gain
-Removal of all sanctions currently placed on North Korea by South Korea.
-South Korea will work with North Korea to develop and maintain a thriving energy and manufacturing industry .
-South Korea will Subsidize North Koran manufacturing to start up firms succeed.
-South Korea agrees to bilateral free trade with North Korea.
-Atlasia agrees to not block IMF/World Bank/WTO assistance.
-China and South Korea will support  Pak Pong-ju as leader of North Korea.

On top of this, most of the countries worked out financing payments for reparations, it's not going to be due upfront. We are also assisting them with repairs to their infrastructure and providing aid to their civilians. Given what North Korea is getting out of the deals and the time they are being given to make payments, there would seriously have to be something wrong for them not to be able to do so.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.