2000 vs 2004: what result do you like better? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:34:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  2000 vs 2004: what result do you like better? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: (skip)
#1
2000
 
#2
2004
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: 2000 vs 2004: what result do you like better?  (Read 843 times)
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,679
« on: October 14, 2017, 02:15:14 PM »

2004.  It is easily the most aesthetically pleasing map since 1940.

For the 20th century, going purely on aesthetics:

1. 1904
2. 1916
3. 1940
4. 2004
5. 1924

Regionalism leads to much more visually appealing maps than the present cities/suburbs/rural divide, so I don't think we will see something as attractive looking as 2004 for quite some time.  Maybe a Dem winning by 5ish in the 2030's?



But this map gets very ugly very quickly if any New England states go for the Republican.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.