S15: Revenue Enhancement Study Act (Statute) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:25:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  S15: Revenue Enhancement Study Act (Statute) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: S15: Revenue Enhancement Study Act (Statute)  (Read 505 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« on: October 11, 2017, 05:53:54 AM »
« edited: October 22, 2017, 05:57:59 AM by Southern Speaker/National Archivist TimTurner »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: Delegate Mr. Reactionary
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2017, 06:59:22 PM »

Looks like a good bill to me.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2017, 06:11:23 AM »

Would anyone object if I called a final vote?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2017, 08:45:43 PM »

I call a final vote.
[] aye
[] nay
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2017, 05:57:00 AM »

Aye
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2017, 08:57:52 AM »

By a vote of 2 ayes to 0 nays, this bill passes.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2017, 05:24:52 AM »

X Governor Leinad

That being said I agree with IceAgeComing's assessment that 1) we should just be able to ask the GM team (they're pretty good, I think they'd respond) and 2) that environmental concerns should be included in the study. But I don't really think this hurts us--considering point 1 we can simply ask the GM team to address point 2.

The most disturbing thing about this thread is that someone wrote a thoughtful letter with concerns that the bill is being "rushed along to a vote with very little thought" and then, without addressing said concerns whatsoever, the next post simply began the final vote. A vote that only had 2 members voting, which is just embarrassing.

And yes, I take partial responsibility for this. Ideally I would be engaged and active and that would carry over to the Chamber. But unfortunately I haven't been able to do that due to my own issues and my RL schedule getting busier. (That's why I'm not running, of course.)
I assume one could simply have a separate environmental study as well. I don't feel strongly either way on this issue - I am open to this bill being amended later.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.