Sanders giving opening address at women's conference
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 09:43:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Sanders giving opening address at women's conference
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Sanders giving opening address at women's conference  (Read 3643 times)
YE
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,745


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 14, 2017, 11:34:52 PM »

It's absurd for a man to be the most prominent speaker - and opening speaker - at a women's conference. It's even more absurd for men to demand that Bernie be given the slot. For better or worse (and I don't agree with all the criticisms of him, but it is true that his campaign reinforced narratives that hurt the Democratic nominee in the GE), Bernie is a divisive figure now and the women's conference should be focused on their goals of protecting women's rights, rather than a controversy which is now detracting from the mission of the conference. The Sanders movement can have their own conferences where he's heavily featured, but this is not his event and he is derailing it.

If I was organizing this event, I would have chosen Kristen Gillibrand, since she's probably the most feminist senator in the United STates. However, this idea that because Bernie talks primarily on economic issues makes him some sexist is completely false. No one has demanded Bernie to be given the slot, but since he was already been invited, I and other presumably are making an argument that he's definitely not a bad choice.
Logged
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,475
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 14, 2017, 11:43:12 PM »

If we were playing a game of horrible-thread bingo, I think we all would have won somewhere on the first page.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,114
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 15, 2017, 12:18:38 AM »

It's absurd for a man to be the most prominent speaker - and opening speaker - at a women's conference. It's even more absurd for men to demand that Bernie be given the slot. For better or worse (and I don't agree with all the criticisms of him, but it is true that his campaign reinforced narratives that hurt the Democratic nominee in the GE), Bernie is a divisive figure now and the women's conference should be focused on their goals of protecting women's rights, rather than a controversy which is now detracting from the mission of the conference. The Sanders movement can have their own conferences where he's heavily featured, but this is not his event and he is derailing it.

Who's "demanding" that he speak? The organizers invited him - after the women they asked turned them down to go raise money for Senate candidates who are already going to win.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 15, 2017, 03:54:09 AM »

On what does Bernie Sanders disagree with most Democrats regarding women issues?


Bernie supported the anti-choice candidate in the Omaha mayoral race. Since the election, Bernie has repeated said women and other minority issues are "distractions" from white people economic concerns. The tone of Sanders negativity reeks of Fox News conservatism, why does he keep being pushed on by the DNC when the base wants no association with that pervert?

That is again an Alex Jones type lie. The candidate for Mayor was not anti-choice & fully pledged to support choice for women but was personally pro-life. He was also supported by Planned Parenthood local bodies.

Every single politician in history has supported some mildly pro-life candidates. Tim Kaine was a hard right super anti-choice candidate by Democratic standards & imposed harsh restrictions. Hillary Clinton chose Kaine as her VP & Kaine would have been President if anything happened to Clinton. Sanders was to the left of Clinton about his views on abortion.

This is just a false & dumb statement.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 15, 2017, 04:09:21 AM »

A few things:

1. Sanders is not the keynote speaker, he is merely the opening speaker. Maxine Waters's speech, which is at a later point in the conference, is designated as the Keynote.

2. Hillary never actually defined at what point she felt an abortion should be classified as "late-term", she just said she was in favor of a "late term regulation with exceptions". No one knows exactly what that would look like, but considering she enthusiastically defended her past support of some partial-birth abortions during the final GE debate, it's obviously something way more limited than a 24-week ban. Jfern is correct that Sanders explicitly rejected any limitation on abortion, but at the end of the day, there's likely little difference between Sanders's view and Hillary's view in practice.

3. I'm sorry, DNC, Women's conference, and Tom Perez, but the pro-choice movement has no serious following in Nebraska, and that will always be the case. If you're looking for a democrat with a perfect pro choice record in Nebraska, I'd be very surprised if you ever found one. Even the candidate at the top of your bench, Brad Ashford, lacks a perfect pro-choice record. But I can tell you that Brad Ashford or Heath Mello will vote with you way more than Ben Sasse and Deb Fischer ever will.

4. Sanders was not the conference's first choice, they went to him after several prominent women declined, including Hillary Clinton, and he is one of just two men speaking at the conference.

1 - Just to add the people who rejected key slots are Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand. Sanders despite his busy schedule took time out of it & should be applauded for it. Kamala Harris is busy doing a fundraiser.

2 - The candidate in Nebraska was not anti-choice & never advocated for banning abortions, overturning Roe vs Wade etc. Anti-choice is too strong a word here. He was personally pro-life & had support of local Planned Parenthood. By this logic, Casey, Manchin, Tim Kaine & many others should be booted out of the Dem party.

3 - No candidate in modern history has only supported super pro-choice candidates 100% of the times. The Nebraska candidate was very progressive in economics & environmental issues & moderate in abortions. Hillary choice a staunchly anti-abortion Tim Kaine as her VP & Kaine would have become the most anti-choice Democrat in recent history. Kaine was way more anti-choice

4 - EMILY's list invited Bill Clinton as the keynote speaker & praised him. A group meant to support pro-choice women candidates invites a person like Bill Clinton with a shady history of sexual attacks.

5 - Sanders has a 100% pro-choice voting record, was to the left of Clinton on abortions, refused to take a stand against even late term-abortions which Clinton was mildly against, fought for pay equity for women. His economic agenda including Minimum Wage, Paid Maternity leave, Family Leave etc would have disproportionately benefited women & people of colour.

6 - Sanders is the most popular politician today & a key ally on many issues for women. I don't see the big deal about this when Bill Clinton headlines for EMILY's list. The hue n cry is from Neera Tanden, Joy Reid & some Clinton allies in the media.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,731


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 15, 2017, 04:19:44 AM »

4 - EMILY's list invited Bill Clinton as the keynote speaker & praised him. A group meant to support pro-choice women candidates invites a person like Bill Clinton with a shady history of sexual attacks.

SJWs never seem too concerned about establishment Democrats. They only go after whomever the establishment Democrats don't like.
Logged
AtorBoltox
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,043


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 15, 2017, 05:51:19 AM »

Why are Hillary hacks always lying?
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,817
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: October 15, 2017, 06:39:01 AM »
« Edited: October 15, 2017, 06:41:17 AM by Intell »

Hillary people just love to make lies up don't they (especially when their leaders don't give a dam*n to attend a women's confrence)?
Logged
Lord Admirale
Admiral President
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,880
United States Minor Outlying Islands


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -0.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: October 15, 2017, 10:28:47 AM »

Every single politician in history has supported some mildly pro-life candidates. Tim Kaine was a hard right super anti-choice candidate by Democratic standards & imposed harsh restrictions. Hillary Clinton chose Kaine as her VP & Kaine would have been President if anything happened to Clinton. Sanders was to the left of Clinton about his views on abortion.
Shadows, yet again, proves himself to be as knowledgeable of politics as a bag of sand.
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,209


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: October 15, 2017, 11:05:01 AM »

Can people who agree with each other on over 70% of policies stop attacking each other over stupid garbage?

Come on guys.
Logged
TheSaint250
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,073


Political Matrix
E: -2.84, S: 5.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: October 15, 2017, 11:07:39 AM »

Can people who agree with each other on over 70% of policies stop attacking each other over stupid garbage?

Come on guys.

This.

Republicans benefit from this infighting, but this is just sad for me to watch.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: October 15, 2017, 11:14:38 AM »

This thread is trash.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: October 15, 2017, 12:32:47 PM »


Pretty much. If this is the sort of thing Democrats are going to keep fighting over, I guess I'd better congratulate Trump on his re-election.
Logged
James Monroe
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,505


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: October 15, 2017, 01:15:18 PM »

Bernie cult has damaged the brand of the Democratic Party, it's no fault that many delusional millennials brought into the lie that Hillary was "unqualified" and she was "corrupt". This election was life or death consequence and we were screwed over by a curmudgeon senator who's ego couldn't step aside for a potential female president. All the sh**t burning down in Washington can be traced to the far-left sabotaging the  presidential election, from Bernard and Kremlin Jill Stein.



Why should true Democrats collaborates with those losers?
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: October 15, 2017, 02:04:20 PM »


Pretty much. If this is the sort of thing Democrats are going to keep fighting over, I guess I'd better congratulate Trump on his re-election.

Sanders is one of my top choices for 2020, but if this is what awaits us, I'll go for someone else. I'd prefer to leave 2016.
Logged
PoliticalJunkie23
Rookie
**
Posts: 93
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: October 15, 2017, 02:24:05 PM »

On what does Bernie Sanders disagree with most Democrats regarding women issues?


Bernie supported the anti-choice candidate in the Omaha mayoral race. Since the election, Bernie has repeated said women and other minority issues are "distractions" from white people economic concerns. The tone of Sanders negativity reeks of Fox News conservatism, why does he keep being pushed on by the DNC when the base wants no association with that pervert?

The DNC loves Bernie so much they rigged the primaries against him.
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,594
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: October 15, 2017, 02:31:13 PM »

Bernie has no sense of shame.  He's nakedly desperate to be President at this point.  No self awareness.
Logged
60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED
ahugecat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 868


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: October 16, 2017, 10:14:43 AM »
« Edited: October 16, 2017, 10:18:03 AM by 60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED »

The so-called "feminist icon" Hillary Clinton didn't even show up for a scheduled Woman's Hour interview: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/16/hillary-clinton-arrives-too-late-for-womans-hour-interview

ETA: She's now claiming she hurt her foot: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4984972/Clinton-apologetic-missing-BBC-interview.html

If true, then my bad. I actually want to hear more about what happened on election night but no one has asked the real question: why didn't she show up at the Javits Center? We all know why, but I'd like to see what she says about it.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: October 16, 2017, 10:57:41 AM »

Bernie cult has damaged the brand of the Democratic Party, it's no fault that many delusional millennials brought into the lie that Hillary was "unqualified" and she was "corrupt". This election was life or death consequence and we were screwed over by a curmudgeon senator who's ego couldn't step aside for a potential female president. All the sh**t burning down in Washington can be traced to the far-left sabotaging the  presidential election, from Bernard and Kremlin Jill Stein.



Why should true Democrats collaborates with those losers?

Imagine thinking Jill Stein is allied with the Kremlin lol
Logged
60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED
ahugecat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 868


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: October 16, 2017, 11:04:53 AM »

Bernie cult has damaged the brand of the Democratic Party, it's no fault that many delusional millennials brought into the lie that Hillary was "unqualified" and she was "corrupt". This election was life or death consequence and we were screwed over by a curmudgeon senator who's ego couldn't step aside for a potential female president. All the sh**t burning down in Washington can be traced to the far-left sabotaging the  presidential election, from Bernard and Kremlin Jill Stein.



Why should true Democrats collaborates with those losers?

Imagine thinking Jill Stein is allied with the Kremlin lol

Everyone who has ever been to Russia is all of a sudden a Russian stooge.

Ignoring the fact the Democrats in 2012 were even more pro-Russia than Trump was in 2016. But that's just what they would call an "inconvenient truth."
Logged
James Monroe
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,505


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: October 16, 2017, 03:50:44 PM »

Bernie cult has damaged the brand of the Democratic Party, it's no fault that many delusional millennials brought into the lie that Hillary was "unqualified" and she was "corrupt". This election was life or death consequence and we were screwed over by a curmudgeon senator who's ego couldn't step aside for a potential female president. All the sh**t burning down in Washington can be traced to the far-left sabotaging the  presidential election, from Bernard and Kremlin Jill Stein.



Why should true Democrats collaborates with those losers?



Imagine thinking Jill Stein is allied with the Kremlin lol


 




Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,731


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: October 16, 2017, 05:21:56 PM »

Bernie cult has damaged the brand of the Democratic Party, it's no fault that many delusional millennials brought into the lie that Hillary was "unqualified" and she was "corrupt". This election was life or death consequence and we were screwed over by a curmudgeon senator who's ego couldn't step aside for a potential female president. All the sh**t burning down in Washington can be traced to the far-left sabotaging the  presidential election, from Bernard and Kremlin Jill Stein.



Why should true Democrats collaborates with those losers?

Imagine thinking Jill Stein is allied with the Kremlin lol

Everyone who has ever been to Russia is all of a sudden a Russian stooge.

Ignoring the fact the Democrats in 2012 were even more pro-Russia than Trump was in 2016. But that's just what they would call an "inconvenient truth."

I wonder how much of a Russian stooge being involved with selling 20% of the uranium production in the US to Russia makes you.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
Logged
60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED
ahugecat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 868


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: October 16, 2017, 05:34:41 PM »


And??
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,284
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: October 16, 2017, 06:01:51 PM »

Oh come on, the Jill Stein stuff is nonsense. No one voted for Jill Stein, they voted for "Candidate from left-wing party that isn't Hillary".  If you want to say that Sanders' rhetoric pushed people to voting for her, fine. If you want to say that Russian anti-Clinton campaigning hurt her, fine.

But the idea that her connections to Russia specifically helped her is completely absurd. The Green Party would have taken the same vote share if their nominee was a bronze statue of Ralph Nader.
Logged
60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED
ahugecat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 868


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: October 16, 2017, 06:06:55 PM »

Oh come on, the Jill Stein stuff is nonsense. No one voted for Jill Stein, they voted for "Candidate from left-wing party that isn't Hillary".  If you want to say that Sanders' rhetoric pushed people to voting for her, fine. If you want to say that Russian anti-Clinton campaigning hurt her, fine.

But the idea that her connections to Russia specifically helped her is completely absurd. The Green Party would have taken the same vote share if their nominee was a bronze statue of Ralph Nader.

They are REALLY, really, upset over this loss.

They've become irrational over it and it's quite sad. They're reacting worse than how Republicans reacted when Trump beat them.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 13 queries.