Cory Booker vs Kamala Harris

[OSR stands with Israel]

I say Booker is clearly more electable

[Santander]

Booker

[MAINEiac4434]

Kamala, by a mile.

[Da2017]

Kamala.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

Lol @ all the people saying Booker.

The answer is clearly Kamala Harris.

[Santander]

I will quit Atlas permanently if Harris wins in 2020. It is impossible.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

I will quit Atlas permanently if Harris wins in 2020. It is impossible.

Exactly what we said about Donald J. Trump and how did that work out?

Plus, this is extremely rich coming from someone who likes Tulsi Gabbard.

[Sestak]

I don't know if either are too electable, however, I will say this. The far left have damaged Booker far more successfully on connections to Wall Street, etc. They haven't been nearly as successful with Harris (I mean, the only thing you can bring up is that she didn't prosecute Mnuchin? Seriously?). They have no love for either, but to the far left, Booker is Satan on Earth. Harris is just "not the best".

[Lechasseur]

Neither are very electable at all. I’d say Harris by a bit though.

This

I prefer Booker, but although I think Harris is overrated and I think she would lose to Trump bar a catastrophe (say Trump starting a war with North Korea), the left likes her better so she's probably more electable

[Co-Chair Bagel23]

I say Booker is clearly more electable

[AN63093]

I'd say the difference between the two is somewhat negligible at this point.  Both have basically the same path to the White House (i.e., the "increase minority turnout" path, as opposed to the "flip Erie and Scranton" path).

I don't think either could successfully pull off "both paths" simultaneously, a la Obama, so I consider them roughly even.

[JonHawk]

Both Awful for Democrats but probably Harris, as she is the archetype for the "SJW".

[dw93]

Harris. Booker has more  corporate ties than Harris, and there's the fact that he's bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical industry.

[Mr. Smith]

Harris.

She's a bit more charismatic than Booker.