Are the .1% are shooting themselves in the foot by hording? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:10:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Are the .1% are shooting themselves in the foot by hording? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Are the .1% are shooting themselves in the foot by hording?  (Read 871 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: October 26, 2017, 05:13:15 PM »

I'm actually surprised the rich don't care more about the environment and instead just use it to extract more profits. Aren't they supposed to care about their lineage? Millions/billions in paper and trust funds aren't going to do them much good when the climate goes haywire.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2017, 05:46:55 PM »

I'm actually surprised the rich don't care more about the environment and instead just use it to extract more profits. Aren't they supposed to care about their lineage? Millions/billions in paper and trust funds aren't going to do them much good when the climate goes haywire.

The rich do a lot for the environment in the USA.

What have you done to help it?

As a regular person and not an elite, there's very little I can do on my own either positively or negatively. I know that I haven't released tons of pollution into the air, removed mountaintops, dumped toxic sludge into bodies of water, etc. etc. though, so I think I win by default here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.