Your Reaction: Kamala Harris VS Trump map
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 07:17:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Your Reaction: Kamala Harris VS Trump map
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Your Reaction: Kamala Harris VS Trump map  (Read 2086 times)
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,349
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 18, 2017, 05:43:16 PM »


Harris wins the presidency in a squeaker, while still losing the midwest.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,280
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2017, 05:45:27 PM »

This is not a strategy the Democrats should rely on. By ANY means. Trying to flip AZ and FL in 2020 and ignoring the Midwest may destroy their chances of contending there for decades to come.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2017, 05:51:54 PM »

This is not a strategy the Democrats should rely on. By ANY means. Trying to flip AZ and FL in 2020 and ignoring the Midwest may destroy their chances of contending there for decades to come.
agreed
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2017, 06:00:32 PM »

Flips Michigan, maybe flips Florida. That's it.
Logged
nicholas.slaydon
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,091
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2017, 06:03:11 PM »

Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2017, 06:43:16 PM »

She probably would win Michigan. Hillary only lost there by 10,000 votes and there was heavy third party activity. She would easily do better in Detroit, thus winning the state.

Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,973
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2017, 06:51:52 PM »

I'd be ecstatic Kamala won but I would be disappointed she didn't take back any of the rustbelt states, especially Pennsylvania. But this map is a real possibility. I would give Michigan to Harris though.
Logged
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,929
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2017, 06:52:37 PM »

This is not a strategy the Democrats should rely on. By ANY means. Trying to flip AZ and FL in 2020 and ignoring the Midwest may destroy their chances of contending there for decades to come.
agreed
Agreed regarding Michigan comment above, that will be relatively easy to flip with increased Detroit turnout.
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,207


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 18, 2017, 06:54:42 PM »

On the other hand, focusing obsessively on the Midwest/Rust Belt at the cost of the Sun Belt is a terrible idea: one region is predicted to have strong economic and population growth over the next few decades, the other has been on the decline in both (it LITERALLY has the word "rust" in the name.) People love to fantasize about Making Michigan Titanium D Again, but that's like investing in a record plant.

Err Wisconsin and Minnesota are actually doing pretty well. AFAIK Iowa isn't doing half bad either. It's mostly Michigan that is doing poorly.

Minnesota is actually the wealthiest state when you adjust for cost of living.
Logged
JA
Jacobin American
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,956
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2017, 07:08:18 PM »
« Edited: October 18, 2017, 07:10:46 PM by Jacobin American »

Who's the moron that started the hype about Arizona becoming some Democratic state? The Democrats haven't made any improvements in the state in the past several election cycles; 2016 was simply a poor GOP performance in the state, not some great Democratic inroads.

2016: 44.58% Clinton | 48.08% Trump
2012: 44.45% Obama | 53.48% Romney
2008: 44.91% Obama | 53.39% McCain
2004: 44.32% Kerry | 54.77% Bush Jr.
2000: 44.67% Gore | 50.95% Bush Jr.
1996: 46.52% Clinton | 44.29% Dole
Logged
Kyle Rittenhouse is a Political Prisoner
Jalawest2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,480


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2017, 08:40:13 PM »

Who's the moron that started the hype about Arizona becoming some Democratic state? The Democrats haven't made any improvements in the state in the past several election cycles; 2016 was simply a poor GOP performance in the state, not some great Democratic inroads.

2016: 44.58% Clinton | 48.08% Trump
2012: 44.45% Obama | 53.48% Romney
2008: 44.91% Obama | 53.39% McCain
2004: 44.32% Kerry | 54.77% Bush Jr.
2000: 44.67% Gore | 50.95% Bush Jr.
1996: 46.52% Clinton | 44.29% Dole
This is the dumbest ing thing I have ever heard. The third party vote in AZ was not a conservative one.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,659


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2017, 08:45:09 PM »

Who's the moron that started the hype about Arizona becoming some Democratic state? The Democrats haven't made any improvements in the state in the past several election cycles; 2016 was simply a poor GOP performance in the state, not some great Democratic inroads.

2016: 44.58% Clinton | 48.08% Trump
2012: 44.45% Obama | 53.48% Romney
2008: 44.91% Obama | 53.39% McCain
2004: 44.32% Kerry | 54.77% Bush Jr.
2000: 44.67% Gore | 50.95% Bush Jr.
1996: 46.52% Clinton | 44.29% Dole
This is the dumbest ing thing I have ever heard. The third party vote in AZ was not a conservative one.


Um no , many Gary Johnson voters were Romney voters and Never Trump Republicans.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,659


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2017, 08:47:14 PM »

This should be the dems strategy in 2020(In states to Flip):

1. Michigan
2. Pennsylvania
3. Florida
4. North Carolina
5. Wisconsin
6. Arizona
7. Georgia 
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,280
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2017, 08:55:55 PM »

This should be the dems strategy in 2020(In states to Flip):

1. Michigan
2. Pennsylvania
3. Florida
4. North Carolina
5. Wisconsin
6. Arizona
7. Georgia 

I agree with this honestly
Logged
JA
Jacobin American
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,956
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2017, 09:00:25 PM »

This should be the dems strategy in 2020(In states to Flip):

1. Michigan
2. Pennsylvania
3. Florida
4. North Carolina
5. Wisconsin
6. Arizona
7. Georgia  

I'd move Wisconsin above North Carolina and maybe Florida (I say maybe only because of the mass migration of Puerto Ricans into Florida). Aside from that, I basically agree with you.
Logged
Strudelcutie4427
Singletxguyforfun
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2017, 09:03:48 PM »

Logged
JA
Jacobin American
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,956
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2017, 09:09:31 PM »

Who's the moron that started the hype about Arizona becoming some Democratic state? The Democrats haven't made any improvements in the state in the past several election cycles; 2016 was simply a poor GOP performance in the state, not some great Democratic inroads.

2016: 44.58% Clinton | 48.08% Trump
2012: 44.45% Obama | 53.48% Romney
2008: 44.91% Obama | 53.39% McCain
2004: 44.32% Kerry | 54.77% Bush Jr.
2000: 44.67% Gore | 50.95% Bush Jr.
1996: 46.52% Clinton | 44.29% Dole
This is the dumbest ing thing I have ever heard. The third party vote in AZ was not a conservative one.


Um no , many Gary Johnson voters were Romney voters and Never Trump Republicans.

MOST Johnson voters (~80%) were liberals/moderates, not these NeverTrump Truh Conservatuhs who held their noses for the Donald.

Anyway to the point of JA, how would you explain Maricopa County Democrats having a banner year across the board? I don't think Arizona is his Democratic state in disguise by any means, but it could certainly become a swing state, if it already isn't one. Downballot Democrats did better in nearly all county races than hillary did here.

I should've specified that I only meant at the Presidential level; I wasn't commenting on other races in the state. I'd want to see the results of the Midterms and Gubernatorial election, along with the polls and results of the 2020 election before making any conclusion about Arizona moving Democratic, especially at the Presidential level. No doubt Arizona trended Democratic for Clinton last year, but based on its past voting history its Democratic voting pattern appears to be rather inelastic.
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2017, 09:44:41 PM »

This should be the dems strategy in 2020(In states to Flip):

1. Michigan
2. Pennsylvania
3. Florida
4. North Carolina
5. Wisconsin
6. Arizona
7. Georgia 

I agree with this honestly
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2017, 10:10:17 PM »

This should be the dems strategy in 2020(In states to Flip):

1. Michigan
2. Pennsylvania
3. Florida
4. North Carolina
5. Wisconsin
6. Arizona
7. Georgia 

Wisconsin is too low on the list (no way is it less winnable for Democrats than North Carolina), it should be at least above North Carolina and Florida, and maybe Pennsylvania as well. Other than that, I agree, though maybe North Carolina and Arizona should be switched.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 19, 2017, 04:19:51 PM »

Who's the moron that started the hype about Arizona becoming some Democratic state? The Democrats haven't made any improvements in the state in the past several election cycles; 2016 was simply a poor GOP performance in the state, not some great Democratic inroads.

2016: 44.58% Clinton | 48.08% Trump
2012: 44.45% Obama | 53.48% Romney
2008: 44.91% Obama | 53.39% McCain
2004: 44.32% Kerry | 54.77% Bush Jr.
2000: 44.67% Gore | 50.95% Bush Jr.
1996: 46.52% Clinton | 44.29% Dole

Arizona took  strong D swing from the 2012 election to the 2016 election. This happening in a state with had not voted more than once for a Democratic nominee in a Presidential election since 1948 looks much like Virginia going into 2008. Disapproval of the President in Arizona is high enough consistently that anyone who thinks that Arizona won't be trouble for President Trump is a fool. Republicans' hold on a Senate seat in 2018 in the state looks shaky, and if anything happens to John McCain, then the Republican hold on the seat will itself be shaky. 

Lots of people were surprised to see Virginia going for Obama in 2008, but the portents were there. Much the same portents appear in Arizona this time.   
Logged
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,624
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 19, 2017, 04:31:48 PM »

if dems win az and lose mi then my optimism would be more limited than it might otherwise be.
Logged
Medal506
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,806
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 19, 2017, 06:14:10 PM »

Florida is would be the deciding state then I guess


Harris wins the presidency in a squeaker, while still losing the midwest.

Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA)/ - 272 EV 49.3% PV
President Donald Trump (R-NY)/Vice President Mike Pence (R-IN) - 266 EV 46.8 PV
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,742


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 19, 2017, 06:21:44 PM »

Democrats should target states in this order:

1. Michigan
2. Wisconsin
3. Pennsylvania
4. Florida
5. North Carolina
6. Iowa
7. Arizona
8. Ohio
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,625
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 20, 2017, 02:34:10 AM »

Glad that Trump is unseated, though I'd expect him to challenge the result due to its closeness. He must be defeated by 300+ electoral votes.

However, I think Harris would flip MI back to Democrats again. Clinton just barely lost in a bad year and Harris would increase black turnout in Detroit. Also a good chance that PA flips back.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 14 queries.