Was the British Empire much more democratic than the German Empire in 1913?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 09:26:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Was the British Empire much more democratic than the German Empire in 1913?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Was the British Empire much more democratic than the German Empire in 1913?  (Read 2511 times)
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,604


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 19, 2017, 01:10:55 PM »

Both the UK and the German Second Reich had a king (or emperor), an elected parliament, political parties and prime ministers.

In Germany, there was an universal male suffrage, but according to the Prussian system, the vote of the rich had more value. The top 5% of the voters elected 1/3 of the parliament, the other 15% elected other 1/3 and the remaining 80% elected the remaining 1/3.
In the UK, some poor peasants were disfranchised until the 1920s.

But in the UK, the king was only a figurehead. In the Reich, the kaiser had some power. There was some authoritarian laws, like the anti-socialist laws.

Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2017, 01:38:08 PM »

British Empire as encompassing all colonies? Hardly a Democratic entity, aside of Britain itself and dominions.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,509
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2017, 07:05:03 PM »

British Empire as encompassing all colonies? Hardly a Democratic entity, aside of Britain itself and dominions.

White dominions, at that.  

The Empire was an authoritarian state for everyone else.  
Logged
AtorBoltox
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,977


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2017, 03:46:37 AM »

The United Kingdom itself was obviously a legitimate democracy, Germany was not. The empire wasn't democratic, but at least they hadn't committed genocide in the previous 10 years like Germany had
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,124
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2017, 03:58:03 AM »

The United Kingdom itself was obviously a legitimate democracy, Germany was not. The empire wasn't democratic, but at least they hadn't committed genocide in the previous 10 years like Germany had
The Boers will like to say hello.
Logged
AtorBoltox
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,977


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2017, 04:30:36 AM »

The United Kingdom itself was obviously a legitimate democracy, Germany was not. The empire wasn't democratic, but at least they hadn't committed genocide in the previous 10 years like Germany had
The Boers will like to say hello.
Not denying that the treatment of the Boers was abhorrent, but it's stretching the definition very far to call it a genocide
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,124
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2017, 05:00:01 AM »
« Edited: October 20, 2017, 05:07:58 AM by Southern Speaker/National Archivist TimTurner »

The United Kingdom itself was obviously a legitimate democracy, Germany was not. The empire wasn't democratic, but at least they hadn't committed genocide in the previous 10 years like Germany had
The Boers will like to say hello.
Not denying that the treatment of the Boers was abhorrent, but it's stretching the definition very far to call it a genocide
I wasn't saying if I thought that counts as genocide. My point is that holding up the British as morally superior doesn't make sense. There was really nothing out of the ordinary with what Germany did in its colonies... it was the general European attitude back in the day.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2017, 11:21:16 AM »
« Edited: December 28, 2017, 09:09:37 PM by Lincoln Republican »

The empire aside, concentrating on the United Kingdom itself, the roots of British democracy go back hundreds of years.

The British parliamentary system of government evolved  from an autocratic monarchy into a constitutional monarchy and from a parliament with little real power to a democratic parliament.

The German system, on the other hand, continued to be an autocracy, ruled by an autocratic, archaic relic of a bygone era. This system continued in Germany until 1918, until forced to change by a world war.

Germany has long been a militaristic, aggressive nation, the main aggressors and the main cause of two world wars. Such a culture makes it difficult for democracy to take root and flourish.

Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2017, 08:29:35 AM »

The empire aside, concentrating on the United Kingdom itself, the roots of British democracy go back hundreds of years.

The British parliamentary system of government evolved  from an autocratic monarchy into a constitutional monarchy and from a parliament with little real power to a democratic parliament.

The German system, on the other hand, continued to be an autocracy, ruled by an autocratic, archaic relic of a bygone era.  This system continued in Germany until 1918, until forced to change by a world war.

Germany has long been a militaristic, aggressive nation, the main aggressors and the main cause of two world wars.  Such a culture makes it difficult for democracy to take root and flourish.



WASPs.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2017, 12:11:42 PM »

This question is historically illiterate. When the term 'the British Empire' is used it only ever refers to the overseas territories controlled - both formally and de facto - by the British crown, and never to the United Kingdom itself.1 The term 'German Empire' refers in this period to the unified German state established in 1871, not to German overseas possessions (the usual term for this is the German Colonial Empire). In order to avoid confusion with the Holy Roman Empire many historians even writing in English prefer to refer to that state as the Kaiserreich. It is very important to understand that overseas empires were not considered as parts of their 'parent' states.

Neither the United Kingdom nor the Kaiserreich were what one would now accept as fully democratic, though both states had democratic elements. There's not really much question as to which of the two was more democratic though; the United Kingdom, although a lengthy explanation is necessary to explain why.

Both countries had a restricted franchise based on gender - only men could vote - and in the United Kingdom there was a complex system of enfranchisement that meant that (to grossly simplify an extremely complicated situation) only heads of households and property owners could vote.2 In Germany there was universal manhood suffrage, in fact there had been even before the establishment of the Kaiserreich. You might conclude from this that, actually and quite surprisingly, the Kaiserreich was more democratic, but this would be an error. The British government was directly accountable to the House of Commons, which meant to the electorate; the government could be removed at the ballot box (and was very frequently) and governments had little choice but to respond to public pressure on policy. The Reichstag, however, was essentially a potemkin parliament with very limited powers; it could menace over money, but the executive was not accountable to it but to the Kaiser. Both countries also had powerful upper houses that were (to say the least) less than democratic, but while the powers of the House of Lords were comparatively weak and were severely castrated by the 1911 Parliament Act, the Reichsrat was, in practice, more important than the Reichstag. State governments remained important in Germany and the franchise for these was often gerrymandered in favour of landed interests (this is why the Reichsrat - which was comprised of the representatives of state governments - cannot be considered to be a democratic body). Local government was powerful in both countries, but was considerably more democratic in Britain.

1. Occasionally it is used in reference to Ireland, but this is inaccurate.
2. Heads of households because the non-property based qualification was on the payment of more than ten pounds in rent per annum. By the early 20th century this meant that most slum households had one vote.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2017, 12:15:05 PM »

I wasn't saying if I thought that counts as genocide. My point is that holding up the British as morally superior doesn't make sense. There was really nothing out of the ordinary with what Germany did in its colonies... it was the general European attitude back in the day.

If you're referring to the Herero Wars, they actually were unusual.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,677


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2017, 05:09:57 PM »

I wasn't saying if I thought that counts as genocide. My point is that holding up the British as morally superior doesn't make sense. There was really nothing out of the ordinary with what Germany did in its colonies... it was the general European attitude back in the day.

If you're referring to the Herero Wars, they actually were unusual.

Yes, a mostly-successful attempt to wipe out an entire ethnic group (men, women, and children alike) was not standard operating procedure in the colonies in 1906.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,388
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2017, 01:09:55 AM »

Morality wise, the world was gray vs. gray until the rise of Hitler.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2017, 10:50:19 AM »

The empire aside, concentrating on the United Kingdom itself, the roots of British democracy go back hundreds of years.

The British parliamentary system of government evolved  from an autocratic monarchy into a constitutional monarchy and from a parliament with little real power to a democratic parliament.

The German system, on the other hand, continued to be an autocracy, ruled by an autocratic, archaic relic of a bygone era.  This system continued in Germany until 1918, until forced to change by a world war.

Germany has long been a militaristic, aggressive nation, the main aggressors and the main cause of two world wars.  Such a culture makes it difficult for democracy to take root and flourish.



WASPs.

Does anybody really take issue with my statement that Germany was the main aggressor and the main cause of two world wars?

If so, then explain yourselves.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2017, 10:54:20 AM »

I simply find your vitriol amusing.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 23, 2017, 11:30:02 AM »

I simply find your vitriol amusing.

There is no vitriol.

Only facts.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 23, 2017, 12:23:00 PM »

Here's a funny fact: once democracy was established in Germany, it was Prussia that became a stronghold for Weimar democracy and if the Prussian government haven't been outsed by Papen in 1932, Hitler (if he became Chancellor after all) would have a hell of a hard time imposing his grip.
Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,604


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 23, 2017, 02:40:55 PM »

Before the WW1, not only all the women, but also many men were disfranchised in the UK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representation_of_the_People_Act_1918
Logged
AtorBoltox
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,977


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 23, 2017, 07:15:07 PM »

Morality wise, the world was gray vs. gray until the rise of Hitler.
#analysis
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 23, 2017, 09:30:27 PM »


I’ll keep that in mind when I hear other civilizational theories of yours.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 24, 2017, 04:11:23 PM »

The empire aside, concentrating on the United Kingdom itself, the roots of British democracy go back hundreds of years.

The British parliamentary system of government evolved  from an autocratic monarchy into a constitutional monarchy and from a parliament with little real power to a democratic parliament.

The German system, on the other hand, continued to be an autocracy, ruled by an autocratic, archaic relic of a bygone era.  This system continued in Germany until 1918, until forced to change by a world war.

Germany has long been a militaristic, aggressive nation, the main aggressors and the main cause of two world wars.  Such a culture makes it difficult for democracy to take root and flourish.



WASPs.

Does anybody really take issue with my statement that Germany was the main aggressor and the main cause of two world wars?

If so, then explain yourselves.

Russian aggression was the cause of WWI, and WWII was because the Allies forced an unfair peace on Germany.

Here's a funny fact: once democracy was established in Germany, it was Prussia that became a stronghold for Weimar democracy and if the Prussian government haven't been outsed by Papen in 1932, Hitler (if he became Chancellor after all) would have a hell of a hard time imposing his grip.
Yeah, Prussia was the stronghold against communism and fascism, moreso than any other part of Germany. It was also somewhat monarchist, with more than did so federally voting for the DVP, DNVP, and DDP.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 24, 2017, 04:32:32 PM »

Before the WW1, not only all the women, but also many men were disfranchised in the UK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representation_of_the_People_Act_1918

Do you even read replies? Because I'm sure that someone had already mentioned that...

Both countries had a restricted franchise based on gender - only men could vote - and in the United Kingdom there was a complex system of enfranchisement that meant that (to grossly simplify an extremely complicated situation) only heads of households and property owners could vote.2

2. Heads of households because the non-property based qualification was on the payment of more than ten pounds in rent per annum. By the early 20th century this meant that most slum households had one vote.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 24, 2017, 04:44:51 PM »

Yeah, Prussia was the stronghold against communism and fascism, moreso than any other part of Germany. It was also somewhat monarchist, with more than did so federally voting for the DVP, DNVP, and DDP.

Don't confuse elections with government.

The most important KPD strongholds - Berlin, the Ruhr and the Province of Saxony* - were all in the State of Prussia. As were many regions of particularly notable Nazi electoral success; pretty much all of East Elbia, Schleswig-Holstein, the rural Protestant parts of Hanover Province and so on.

What distinguished Prussian state politics was a powerful SPD leader - Otto Braun - who worked well with the Zentrum (who at state level were dominated by their sensible rather than idiot wing) and the DDP.

*Modern day Saxony-Anhalt, less Anhalt. More or less.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 24, 2017, 10:38:04 PM »

The empire aside, concentrating on the United Kingdom itself, the roots of British democracy go back hundreds of years.

The British parliamentary system of government evolved  from an autocratic monarchy into a constitutional monarchy and from a parliament with little real power to a democratic parliament.

The German system, on the other hand, continued to be an autocracy, ruled by an autocratic, archaic relic of a bygone era.  This system continued in Germany until 1918, until forced to change by a world war.

Germany has long been a militaristic, aggressive nation, the main aggressors and the main cause of two world wars.  Such a culture makes it difficult for democracy to take root and flourish.



WASPs.

Does anybody really take issue with my statement that Germany was the main aggressor and the main cause of two world wars?

If so, then explain yourselves.

Russian aggression was the cause of WWI, and WWII was because the Allies forced an unfair peace on Germany.

Here's a funny fact: once democracy was established in Germany, it was Prussia that became a stronghold for Weimar democracy and if the Prussian government haven't been outsed by Papen in 1932, Hitler (if he became Chancellor after all) would have a hell of a hard time imposing his grip.
Yeah, Prussia was the stronghold against communism and fascism, moreso than any other part of Germany. It was also somewhat monarchist, with more than did so federally voting for the DVP, DNVP, and DDP.

Does not change the fact Germany was the major aggressor and cause.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 12 queries.