Republicans: we are now against spending cuts, they're unpopular and won't work (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:34:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Republicans: we are now against spending cuts, they're unpopular and won't work (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Republicans: we are now against spending cuts, they're unpopular and won't work  (Read 2997 times)
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


« on: October 19, 2017, 07:03:38 PM »

Is there any evidence that Republican voters supported spending cuts anyway?

Not the kind of spending cuts that would even remotely come close to balancing the budget.

Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2017, 12:31:07 PM »

Therefore we need huge tax breaks for the wealthy, because that will generate so much growth that we have more revenue in the end and the wealth will somehow trickle down.

Honestly, the fact that Reagan was somehow able to sell this nonsense with a straight face and have half the country at the time believe him goes to show you how stupid people can be.

I guess that's the positive of having a TV Star elected president.    Unfortunately in the case of Trump he's running the White House staff a little to similarly to The Apprentice.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2017, 03:20:50 PM »

Therefore we need huge tax breaks for the wealthy, because that will generate so much growth that we have more revenue in the end and the wealth will somehow trickle down.

Honestly, the fact that Reagan was somehow able to sell this nonsense with a straight face and have half the country at the time believe him goes to show you how stupid people can be.


Tax Revenue went up from 517 billion in 1980 to 1.03 trillion in 1990. So Tax Revenues almost doubled in the 1980s, so no it was not the tax cuts that caused the deficits it was the increases in spending.

Of course it goes up in gross amount, if it didn't that wouldve been a disaster with inflation and the general growth of the economy over 10 years.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2017, 03:35:42 PM »

Therefore we need huge tax breaks for the wealthy, because that will generate so much growth that we have more revenue in the end and the wealth will somehow trickle down.

Honestly, the fact that Reagan was somehow able to sell this nonsense with a straight face and have half the country at the time believe him goes to show you how stupid people can be.


Tax Revenue went up from 517 billion in 1980 to 1.03 trillion in 1990. So Tax Revenues almost doubled in the 1980s, so no it was not the tax cuts that caused the deficits it was the increases in spending.

Of course it goes up in gross amount, if it didn't that wouldve been a disaster with inflation and the general growth of the economy over 10 years.


1980's revenue inflation adjusted  would be 801.56 billion , which means that an additional 200 billion in tax revenue came from economic growth . Also this is discounting the fact that the overall inflation rate dropped in the 1980s dramatically, so the fact is the economy did grow rapidly in the 1980s due to the tax cuts .




That's a very bold statement.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.