Democrats worried about an expensive primary war for Dianne Feinstein's seat (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:23:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Democrats worried about an expensive primary war for Dianne Feinstein's seat (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democrats worried about an expensive primary war for Dianne Feinstein's seat  (Read 1691 times)
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« on: October 20, 2017, 02:04:22 PM »

When are Democrats ever not worried about something? Talk about overreaction. The Republican Party was subject to a hostile takeover last year and they constantly have competitive, divisive, expensive primaries (occasionally even in swing states and blue states!) Clearly that's really taking a toll on them politically. Roll Eyes

At the very least, you could say it doesn't help to have candidates tied up in expensive primaries, at least in competitive states. But in general I think I have to agree with you. Obviously a party should want to avoid bitter intra-party feuding, but then again a party will never evolve if it doesn't have these fights from time to time. After all, the feuding in the Democratic Party isn't petty. It's an ongoing fight over the direction of the party, ideologically and strategically.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2017, 08:06:36 PM »

I fail to see the downside of a CA General being a firey, high-energy showdown between Feinstein and de Leon. It'll drag dems to tje polls and might make Republicans stay home, which is great for House candidates.

If the general election is Feinstein vs de Leon, that would be amazing. However, to really get the benefit of depressed Republican turnout, the Governor's race needs to be DvD as well, or maybe at least Democrat vs Ultimate "Some Dude," although I'm not sure how bad that would be for the CAGOP in terms of turnout.

While not as interesting, I'd also note that Republican state legislative candidates in California would be in trouble if no Republican made it to the GE in CA's Senate/Governors races. They rely on ticket splitting and optimal Republican turnout to stay afloat in Romney/Clinton or Obama/Clinton districts. If they see lower turnout and more straight ticket voting in 2018, Democrats could really sweep legislative races and build a comfortable supermajority.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2017, 04:13:59 PM »

The advantage, if they both make the top two, is that it would depress Republican turnout in House elections, although I question how ethical this strategy is.

Maybe it would push the CAGOP to invest in a ballot initiative that would scrap jungle primaries. I really don't like it myself, and Republicans would be wise to try and get it removed while they still can.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.