After Weinstein’s fall, Trump accusers wonder: Why not him?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:47:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  After Weinstein’s fall, Trump accusers wonder: Why not him?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: After Weinstein’s fall, Trump accusers wonder: Why not him?  (Read 2623 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,874


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 21, 2017, 07:00:11 PM »

Almost a year after New Yorker Jessica Leeds and other women stepped forward with harrowing accounts of being sexually assaulted by a powerful man, another scandal with similar elements exploded.

Only this time, the punishment was swift and devastating.

“It is hard to reconcile that Harvey Weinstein could be brought down with this, and [President] Trump just continues to be the Teflon Don,” said Leeds, who claims she was groped 30 years ago on a plane by the man whose presence she cannot escape now that he sits in the Oval Office.

In Florida, Melinda McGillivray, was having much the same reaction.

“What pisses me off is that the guy is president,” McGillivray, who a year ago went public with allegations that Trump grabbed her at Mar-a-Lago in 2003 when she was 23. “It’s that simple.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/my-pain-is-everyday-after-weinsteins-fall-trump-accusers-wonder-why-not-him/2017/10/21/bce67720-b585-11e7-be94-fabb0f1e9ffb_story.html
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2017, 07:05:20 PM »

Are we sure we can impeach the President for actions taken before he/she enters office?
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,624


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2017, 07:27:44 PM »

Are we sure we can impeach the President for actions taken before he/she enters office?

The Constitution (Article II, Section 4) says this:

"The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

There is nothing there that limits this to actions taken during the term of office.  
Logged
daveosupremo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 468
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -2.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2017, 07:53:30 PM »

Evidence
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2017, 07:55:01 PM »

How much more do you need?
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2017, 08:12:43 PM »

Are we sure we can impeach the President for actions taken before he/she enters office?

The Constitution (Article II, Section 4) says this:

"The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

There is nothing there that limits this to actions taken during the term of office.  

I was under the impression that impeachment is basically a political action, and they can really remove him for whatever reason they want. It's up to them to determine what all that (high crimes, etc) means. After all, it's not like a Senate conviction is equivalent to a criminal conviction. It's just to remove him from office.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,393
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2017, 08:19:09 PM »

The difference is that Republicans largely stood by Trump, while nobody did that for Harvey
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,112
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2017, 08:19:17 PM »

Trump is protected by partisan politics, whereas Weinstein is a Hollywood producer that is being held accountable by the private sector. Trump could have been abandoned by the GOP after the Access Hollywood tape, but they wanted the Presidency and chose to overlook it.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2017, 08:28:22 PM »

Republicans wanted a tax cut and hated Obama so much that they by and large stood by Trump even after the Access Hollywood tape, revealing themselves to be complete hypocrites and scumbags. Smiley
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,624


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2017, 08:31:12 PM »

Trump is protected by partisan politics, whereas Weinstein is a Hollywood producer that is being held accountable by the private sector. Trump could have been abandoned by the GOP after the Access Hollywood tape, but they wanted the Presidency and chose to overlook it.

It's not just a public/private sector divide, or Bill O'Reilly would be long gone from Fox.
Logged
SNJ1985
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,277
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.19, S: 7.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2017, 08:40:09 PM »

The difference is that Republicans largely stood by Trump, while nobody did that for Harvey

Hollywood had some knowledge of what Harvey was up to and stood by him until the public found out. His behavior is referenced in episodes of TV shows that were produced years ago.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,112
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2017, 08:53:33 PM »

Trump is protected by partisan politics, whereas Weinstein is a Hollywood producer that is being held accountable by the private sector. Trump could have been abandoned by the GOP after the Access Hollywood tape, but they wanted the Presidency and chose to overlook it.

It's not just a public/private sector divide, or Bill O'Reilly would be long gone from Fox.
Fox News is a media outlet for conservatives and their audience wanted to see Bill O'Reilly, so they kept him on as long as they possibly could. It was only when the sponsors started to pull ads that Fox News decided to fire him. Politics played a role there.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,112
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2017, 08:55:24 PM »

The difference is that Republicans largely stood by Trump, while nobody did that for Harvey

Hollywood had some knowledge of what Harvey was up to and stood by him until the public found out. His behavior is referenced in episodes of TV shows that were produced years ago.

Republicans had some knowledge of what Trump was up to and stood by him until after the public found out. His behavior is referenced in episodes of TV shows that were produced year ago.

Not only that, but Trump referenced his behavior in his own words and the Republican Party still didn't drop him.
Logged
SNJ1985
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,277
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.19, S: 7.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 21, 2017, 09:02:37 PM »

All I'm saying is that Hollywood doesn't deserve to be praised or held up as more moral than the Republicans who stood by Trump.
Logged
Statilius the Epicurean
Thersites
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,607
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 21, 2017, 09:14:14 PM »

Hollywood is a centre of moral accountability whereas the Republican party is not
Logged
Alabama_Indy10
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 21, 2017, 10:08:44 PM »

Hollywood is a centre of moral accountability whereas the Republican party is not

I literally spit out my drink when I read this. Lol
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 21, 2017, 10:19:24 PM »

Hollywood is a centre of moral accountability whereas the Republican party is not

The casting couch, an allegation that has been in existence since the silent film era, is no myth.

Donald Trump is the first Presidential nominee to admit to sexual assault (as in, "I grab them by their  [crorches])"

As a juror, I could convict someone of sexual assault in the event of someone grabbing a woman by her "kitty-cat" without consent, I am not sure that intentional or reckless penetration without at least implicit consent would constitute rape... but I could vote for rape under some circumstances.

The penetration could be as slight as  a fingernail. 
Logged
Confused Democrat
reidmill
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,055
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 21, 2017, 10:21:30 PM »


Wasn't there basically enough evidence on Trump as there was on Weinstein or am I missing something

No, I don't think so. Weinstein actually settled with a lot of the woman he sexually harassed. I don't think T
Logged
Confused Democrat
reidmill
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,055
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 21, 2017, 10:21:53 PM »


Wasn't there basically enough evidence on Trump as there was on Weinstein or am I missing something

No, I don't think so. Weinstein actually settled with a lot of the woman he sexually harassed. I don't think Trump has payed any of his accusers off.
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,439


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 21, 2017, 10:57:43 PM »

All I'm saying is that Hollywood doesn't deserve to be praised or held up as more moral than the Republicans who stood by Trump.

Because holding someone to account for their actions vs. making them President is totally the same.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 22, 2017, 01:50:26 AM »

Republicans wanted a tax cut and hated Obama so much that they by and large stood by Trump even after the Access Hollywood tape, revealing themselves to be complete hypocrites and scumbags. Smiley

Yeah I don't want to hear a word from Republicans about "family values" ever again

You'll hear about it every year for the next 30+ years that Justice Gorsuch is on the bench.
Logged
60+ GOP Seats After 2018 GUARANTEED
ahugecat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 868


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 22, 2017, 02:47:05 AM »

Almost a year after New Yorker Jessica Leeds and other women stepped forward with harrowing accounts of being sexually assaulted by a powerful man, another scandal with similar elements exploded.

Only this time, the punishment was swift and devastating.

“It is hard to reconcile that Harvey Weinstein could be brought down with this, and [President] Trump just continues to be the Teflon Don,” said Leeds, who claims she was groped 30 years ago on a plane by the man whose presence she cannot escape now that he sits in the Oval Office.

In Florida, Melinda McGillivray, was having much the same reaction.

“What pisses me off is that the guy is president,” McGillivray, who a year ago went public with allegations that Trump grabbed her at Mar-a-Lago in 2003 when she was 23. “It’s that simple.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/my-pain-is-everyday-after-weinsteins-fall-trump-accusers-wonder-why-not-him/2017/10/21/bce67720-b585-11e7-be94-fabb0f1e9ffb_story.html

Because it was clearly a political attack that everyone saw coming a mile away.

Then you had porn stars getting involved. Gloria Allred.

It was clearly a hit job. They did the same thing to Arnold Schwarzenegger during his run for governor.

The New York Times even hinted early in 2016 that they were going to use women (including Alicia Machado) as a weapon against Trump. The Access Hollywood tape was discovered in March 2016 and all the media knew about it. They had it all planned.

Frickin sick that Democrats would use sexual assault as a political weapon but I wouldn't put anything past them.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 22, 2017, 02:50:53 AM »

Almost a year after New Yorker Jessica Leeds and other women stepped forward with harrowing accounts of being sexually assaulted by a powerful man, another scandal with similar elements exploded.

Only this time, the punishment was swift and devastating.

“It is hard to reconcile that Harvey Weinstein could be brought down with this, and [President] Trump just continues to be the Teflon Don,” said Leeds, who claims she was groped 30 years ago on a plane by the man whose presence she cannot escape now that he sits in the Oval Office.

In Florida, Melinda McGillivray, was having much the same reaction.

“What pisses me off is that the guy is president,” McGillivray, who a year ago went public with allegations that Trump grabbed her at Mar-a-Lago in 2003 when she was 23. “It’s that simple.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/my-pain-is-everyday-after-weinsteins-fall-trump-accusers-wonder-why-not-him/2017/10/21/bce67720-b585-11e7-be94-fabb0f1e9ffb_story.html

Because it was clearly a political attack that everyone saw coming a mile away.

Then you had porn stars getting involved. Gloria Allred.

It was clearly a hit job. They did the same thing to Arnold Schwarzenegger during his run for governor.

The New York Times even hinted early in 2016 that they were going to use women (including Alicia Machado) as a weapon against Trump. The Access Hollywood tape was discovered in March 2016 and all the media knew about it. They had it all planned.

Frickin sick that Democrats would use sexual assault as a political weapon but I wouldn't put anything past them.

Arnold is a #resistance hero, so his sexual assaults were OK.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,624


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 22, 2017, 08:11:27 AM »

Almost a year after New Yorker Jessica Leeds and other women stepped forward with harrowing accounts of being sexually assaulted by a powerful man, another scandal with similar elements exploded.

Only this time, the punishment was swift and devastating.

“It is hard to reconcile that Harvey Weinstein could be brought down with this, and [President] Trump just continues to be the Teflon Don,” said Leeds, who claims she was groped 30 years ago on a plane by the man whose presence she cannot escape now that he sits in the Oval Office.

In Florida, Melinda McGillivray, was having much the same reaction.

“What pisses me off is that the guy is president,” McGillivray, who a year ago went public with allegations that Trump grabbed her at Mar-a-Lago in 2003 when she was 23. “It’s that simple.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/my-pain-is-everyday-after-weinsteins-fall-trump-accusers-wonder-why-not-him/2017/10/21/bce67720-b585-11e7-be94-fabb0f1e9ffb_story.html

Because it was clearly a political attack that everyone saw coming a mile away.

Then you had porn stars getting involved. Gloria Allred.

It was clearly a hit job. They did the same thing to Arnold Schwarzenegger during his run for governor.

The New York Times even hinted early in 2016 that they were going to use women (including Alicia Machado) as a weapon against Trump. The Access Hollywood tape was discovered in March 2016 and all the media knew about it. They had it all planned.

Frickin sick that Democrats would use sexual assault as a political weapon but I wouldn't put anything past them.

Come on. There have been accusations against Trump since long before he was a candidate.  There was a rape allegation (later recanted) in Ivana'a 1990 divorce proceeding, and Jill Harth sued Trump for sexual harassment in 1997.  That suit was withdrawn when Trump settled another suit by Harth for breach of contract.

Also, don't forget that the Access Hollywood tape in which Trump boasted of grabbing women by the genitals was recorded in 2005!  It's simply not correct to say that this all came out of nowhere when Trump started running.
Logged
Fuzzy Says: "Abolish NPR!"
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,675
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 22, 2017, 08:18:02 AM »

Hollywood is a centre of moral accountability whereas the Republican party is not

I literally spit out my drink when I read this. Lol

I thought:  "This is your brain on drugs!".

Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.062 seconds with 12 queries.