DNC faces fundrasing shortage

[NewYorkExpress]

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/22/dnc-2018-rebuilding-finances-244019

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Is this fixable? And if so, what is the solution?

[Frodo]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

It seems this funding shortfall is a more dire situation if you are seeking to take back state legislatures and governors mansions in time for the 2020 redistricting cycle, as opposed to Congressional races. 

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Maybe kicking all the berniecrats out and bringing in cheater Donna Brazile has something to do with it.

[Blue3]

Most people just donate to the DCCC now, or the individual campaigns.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

The RNC has been doing well.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

The RNC has been doing well.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But politicians praised Nancy because she could fundraise. Looks like that was code for fudraise for our consultants.

[Yank2133]

The RNC has been doing well.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But politicians praised Nancy because she could fundraise. Looks like that was code for fudraise for our consultants.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

Pelosi raised 25 million for the DCCC over the summer. She has nothing to do with the DNC, which's importance has been inflated.

[Rookie Yinzer]

The RNC has been doing well.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But politicians praised Nancy because she could fundraise. Looks like that was code for fudraise for our consultants.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

Pelosi raised 25 million for the DCCC over the summer. She has nothing to do with the DNC, which's importance has been inflated.

The above poster is delusional and wrong. As usual.

ETA: Not you Yank, the poster who deems himself an expert on the inner workings of American political fundraising but doesn't even live here.

[Badger]

The RNC has been doing well.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But politicians praised Nancy because she could fundraise. Looks like that was code for fudraise for our consultants.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

Pelosi raised 25 million for the DCCC over the summer. She has nothing to do with the DNC, which's importance has been inflated.

The above poster is delusional and wrong. As usual.

Um, how? The D Triple C is where the money is supposed to go now. That and the dscc

[Devout Centrist]

The DNC isn’t what needs the money right now, folks.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

The DNC isn’t what needs the money right now, folks.

LOL at the spin that somehow that $8 million fundraising advantage the Democrats have in the House and Senate committees makes up for a $47 million disadvantage in the national committees.

Also, Republicans still have more total cash on hands for the congressional committees.

http://classic.fec.gov/disclosure/partySummary.do

[BudgieForce]

The RNC has been doing well.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But politicians praised Nancy because she could fundraise. Looks like that was code for fudraise for our consultants.

Both of you are ignoring how well the DCCC has been doing in terms of fundraising. But that would go against the narrative your trying to create.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

The RNC has been doing well.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But politicians praised Nancy because she could fundraise. Looks like that was code for fudraise for our consultants.

Both of you are ignoring how well the DCCC has been doing in terms of fundraising. But that would go against the narrative your trying to create.

Already addressed, and the DCCC has a $9 million cash on hand disadvantage. Maybe they shouldn't have blown so much money on Jon Ossoff?

[BudgieForce]

The RNC has been doing well.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But politicians praised Nancy because she could fundraise. Looks like that was code for fudraise for our consultants.

Both of you are ignoring how well the DCCC has been doing in terms of fundraising. But that would go against the narrative your trying to create.

Already addressed, and the DCCC has a $9 million cash on hand disadvantage. Maybe they shouldn't have blown so much money on Jon Ossoff?

Dear lord, your insufferable. :/

[Devout Centrist]

The DNC isn’t what needs the money right now, folks.

LOL at the spin that somehow that $8 million fundraising advantage the Democrats have in the House and Senate committees makes up for a $47 million disadvantage in the national committees.

Also, Republicans still have more total cash on hands for the congressional committees.

http://classic.fec.gov/disclosure/partySummary.do

Disbursement to special elections is drastically higher. Money isn't doing any good just sitting in the DCCC's accounts. And as long as fundrasing continues near or at current levels, it isn't a problem.

Then again, I shouldn't expect anything less from a Leninist.

[Virginiá]

Aren't House Democratic candidates outraising Republican candidates/incumbents across the board right now? The DCCC/DSCC's numbers are fine, and if the DNC wanted more money, then they should stop sucking so much. As for Republicans, doesn't it make sense that they would be raking in more cash, given that they control the entire federal government?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

The DNC isn’t what needs the money right now, folks.

LOL at the spin that somehow that $8 million fundraising advantage the Democrats have in the House and Senate committees makes up for a $47 million disadvantage in the national committees.

Also, Republicans still have more total cash on hands for the congressional committees.

http://classic.fec.gov/disclosure/partySummary.do

Disbursement to special elections is drastically higher. Money isn't doing any good just sitting in the DCCC's accounts. And as long as fundrasing continues near or at current levels, it isn't a problem.

Then again, I shouldn't expect anything less from a Leninist.

Oh, spending money intelligently is one thing, but that did not describe the money wasted on Jon Ossoff, while ignoring the 3 other races, 2 of which had Berniecrats.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Aren't House Democratic candidates outraising Republican candidates/incumbents across the board right now? The DCCC/DSCC's numbers are fine, and if the DNC wanted more money, then they should stop sucking so much. As for Republicans, doesn't it make sense that they would be raking in more cash, given that they control the entire federal government?

Yeah, but don't tell Republican troll jfern that. The Party in power is kinda supposed to be raking it in. If they weren't, that'd be particularly embarrassing. Jfern just wants to pretend he's some sort of liberal Bernie Bro (somehow) still bitter about 2016, but I think it's become quite clear that s/he's just a Republican in disguise.

Telling people who criticize establishment Democrats that they must be a Republican isn't helping. How about not having establishment Democrats suck? The DNC told Bernie people to go screw themselves, so no surprise that they stopped donating.

[Hindsight was 2020]

The DCCC and candidates themselves have been getting the donations

[ProgressiveCanadian]

The RNC has been doing well.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But politicians praised Nancy because she could fundraise. Looks like that was code for fudraise for our consultants.

Both of you are ignoring how well the DCCC has been doing in terms of fundraising. But that would go against the narrative your trying to create.

Already addressed, and the DCCC has a $9 million cash on hand disadvantage. Maybe they shouldn't have blown so much money on Jon Ossoff?

Dear lord, your insufferable. :/

Yes you are. Don't we have enough people on this forum that kiss the ass of the Democratic establisment?

[Yank2133]

Aren't House Democratic candidates outraising Republican candidates/incumbents across the board right now? The DCCC/DSCC's numbers are fine, and if the DNC wanted more money, then they should stop sucking so much. As for Republicans, doesn't it make sense that they would be raking in more cash, given that they control the entire federal government?

Yes and it is getting to the point that the GOP is starting to worry.

https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/659667?unlock=FALH9NUB4D9E32M2

Of course this goes against jfern's narrative.....

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

If you combine the amount of money the Democrats have been making as a whole (DCCC, DNC, Individual candidates, Liberals PACs) They far out raise the Republicans. Conservatives aren't very energized about 2018 and I'm sure congressional republicans aren't very optimistic. 

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Aren't House Democratic candidates outraising Republican candidates/incumbents across the board right now? The DCCC/DSCC's numbers are fine, and if the DNC wanted more money, then they should stop sucking so much. As for Republicans, doesn't it make sense that they would be raking in more cash, given that they control the entire federal government?

Yes and it is getting to the point that the GOP is starting to worry.

https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/659667?unlock=FALH9NUB4D9E32M2

Of course this goes against jfern's narrative.....

People feel differently about giving money to individual candidates than to the party itself, obviously.

[Shadows]

Wasn't Perez supposed to be amazing in fundraising ?

[HAnnA MArin County]

Maybe kicking all the berniecrats out and bringing in cheater Donna Brazile has something to do with it.

Sad!