VA-GOV 2017: It's a Wave (GE: Nov 7th - Thread #2)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:47:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  VA-GOV 2017: It's a Wave (GE: Nov 7th - Thread #2)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76
Author Topic: VA-GOV 2017: It's a Wave (GE: Nov 7th - Thread #2)  (Read 94903 times)
cvparty
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1775 on: November 09, 2017, 10:32:06 PM »

which district is that one red dot in the first quadrant
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,750


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1776 on: November 09, 2017, 10:32:42 PM »

so n districts flipped from Clinton to Gillespie.
n + 7 districts flipped from Trump to Northam.
Does anyone know what n is?
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,796


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1777 on: November 09, 2017, 11:40:16 PM »


Probably HD 40, the one remaining true NOVA seat occupied by the Republicans, and one of the four that will likely head to a recount. The dem was actually ahead there on election night, but a recanvas saw him lose the lead the next day.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,450
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1778 on: November 09, 2017, 11:49:24 PM »

So when will we know the recount results from the HoD results outstanding?

Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,573
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1779 on: November 10, 2017, 12:07:29 AM »


Oh wow. This means that Democrats still have plenty of room to grow in the next election. There could be a clear majority by 2019.

Yes. In fact, it would be fair to say Democrats are favored to take back both the state Senate and HoD in 2019 if the election is even half as good as it was this week. They don't have over a dozen incumbents to take out next time around, and because those were almost all Clinton districts, they will be easier to keep. In many ways this was a massive correction on an over-extended GOP that got greedy in the last round  of redistricting.

As it stands now, there are a few Clinton districts and like a half dozen marginal Trump districts Democrats could make serious plays for. As soon as they take complete control, the HoD gerrymander comes down and there will probably be a slew of pro-voter reforms passed.

It would be nice if someone (DDHQ, perhaps?) could come up with a map showing partisan control district-by-district in the Virginia Senate, like we saw with the House of Delegates in the run-up to this Tuesday. 
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,796


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1780 on: November 10, 2017, 06:45:52 AM »


Oh wow. This means that Democrats still have plenty of room to grow in the next election. There could be a clear majority by 2019.

Yes. In fact, it would be fair to say Democrats are favored to take back both the state Senate and HoD in 2019 if the election is even half as good as it was this week. They don't have over a dozen incumbents to take out next time around, and because those were almost all Clinton districts, they will be easier to keep. In many ways this was a massive correction on an over-extended GOP that got greedy in the last round  of redistricting.

As it stands now, there are a few Clinton districts and like a half dozen marginal Trump districts Democrats could make serious plays for. As soon as they take complete control, the HoD gerrymander comes down and there will probably be a slew of pro-voter reforms passed.

It would be nice if someone (DDHQ, perhaps?) could come up with a map showing partisan control district-by-district in the Virginia Senate, like we saw with the House of Delegates in the run-up to this Tuesday. 

Here is a map of the current senate - note how Dems really drew the map in their favor in 2010:
https://www.vpap.org/elections/senate/

Here is a map showing Clinton's margin in said seats. Reps hold 3 Clinton districts (10, 12, 13,) and 1 marginal Trump district (7). Of course more could be competitive, but this is purely PVI based.
https://www.vpap.org/visuals/visual/2016-presidential-results-by-senate/


Also, the Dem in HD 27, the hardest seat to flip in a recount has conceded. This now puts the chamber at 49-48 D, with 3 seats heading to probable recounts.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,169
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1781 on: November 10, 2017, 01:14:19 PM »

I guess Glen Sturtevant and Dick Black can expect a nice cushy appointment from Northam...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,169
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1782 on: November 10, 2017, 01:23:59 PM »

I guess Glen Sturtevant and Dick Black can expect a nice cushy appointment from Northam...

Dick Black will absolutely never get an appointment from Northam. A quick Google search would show why.

Considering the name, I'm not sure I want to...
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,103
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1783 on: November 10, 2017, 01:26:28 PM »

I guess Glen Sturtevant and Dick Black can expect a nice cushy appointment from Northam...

Dick Black will absolutely never get an appointment from Northam. A quick Google search would show why.

Considering the name, I'm not sure I want to...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/outspoken-virginia-senator-travels-to-syria-in-support-of-assad/2016/04/27/96994e08-0c94-11e6-8ab8-9ad050f76d7d_story.html
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,892
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1784 on: November 10, 2017, 02:01:40 PM »

I guess Glen Sturtevant and Dick Black can expect a nice cushy appointment from Northam...

My guess is they are already strategizing over it, although we might not see anything for a long time, since there is no real urgency as there would maybe before redistricting or a big, consequential policy fight. For instance in mid-2014, Phillip Puckett (D) announced his resignation from the Senate, opening up a D-held Senate district in SWVA. That took over half a year to materialize.

Putting aside the Assad-lover and based on how correlated the victories were to Clinton or marginal Trump districts, there are a few targets in the Senate: Bryce Reeves, Siobhan Dunnavant, Glen Sturtevant and Frank Wagner. Those are all districts Democrats could absolutely win in a hotly-contested special election, and they are pretty vulnerable in 2019. I would peg Sturtevant as a given loss right now, but as a Senate sophomore he might want to try his luck Tongue. Any of the others are reaches at best, although I suppose there are a couple districts that might be possible if Democrats parked an army of volunteers and money in them.

I'm not so sure about the HoD. I'd have to think some of the incumbents who almost lost may be looking to move on/up voluntarily instead of getting chased out of Richmond by a mob of angry Democrats in 2019.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1785 on: November 10, 2017, 02:11:16 PM »

I guess Glen Sturtevant and Dick Black can expect a nice cushy appointment from Northam...

My guess is they are already strategizing over it, although we might not see anything for a long time, since there is no real urgency as there would maybe before redistricting or a big, consequential policy fight. For instance in mid-2014, Phillip Puckett (D) announced his resignation from the Senate, opening up a D-held Senate district in SWVA. That took over half a year to materialize.

Putting aside the Assad-lover and based on how correlated the victories were to Clinton or marginal Trump districts, there are a few targets in the Senate: Bryce Reeves, Siobhan Dunnavant, Glen Sturtevant and Frank Wagner. Those are all districts Democrats could absolutely win in a hotly-contested special election, and they are pretty vulnerable in 2019. I would peg Sturtevant as a given loss right now, but as a Senate sophomore he might want to try his luck Tongue. Any of the others are reaches at best, although I suppose there are a couple districts that might be possible if Democrats parked an army of volunteers and money in them.

I'm not so sure about the HoD. I'd have to think some of the incumbents who almost lost may be looking to move on/up voluntarily instead of getting chased out of Richmond by a mob of angry Democrats in 2019.

My guess is that Northam will wait until after the recounts are finished before making announcements on his cabinet.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,796


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1786 on: November 10, 2017, 02:16:59 PM »

I guess Glen Sturtevant and Dick Black can expect a nice cushy appointment from Northam...

My guess is they are already strategizing over it, although we might not see anything for a long time, since there is no real urgency as there would maybe before redistricting or a big, consequential policy fight. For instance in mid-2014, Phillip Puckett (D) announced his resignation from the Senate, opening up a D-held Senate district in SWVA. That took over half a year to materialize.

Putting aside the Assad-lover and based on how correlated the victories were to Clinton or marginal Trump districts, there are a few targets in the Senate: Bryce Reeves, Siobhan Dunnavant, Glen Sturtevant and Frank Wagner. Those are all districts Democrats could absolutely win in a hotly-contested special election, and they are pretty vulnerable in 2019. I would peg Sturtevant as a given loss right now, but as a Senate sophomore he might want to try his luck Tongue. Any of the others are reaches at best, although I suppose there are a couple districts that might be possible if Democrats parked an army of volunteers and money in them.

I'm not so sure about the HoD. I'd have to think some of the incumbents who almost lost may be looking to move on/up voluntarily instead of getting chased out of Richmond by a mob of angry Democrats in 2019.

My guess is that Northam will wait until after the recounts are finished before making announcements on his cabinet.

I agree. Yancey, the R undergoing a recount in HD 94 for example is an obvious pick. He has traditionally been Pro-Solar and somewhat pro-choice, making him an ideologically easy choice to kick upstairs. However, that appointment can only happen if the recount finds him victorious.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,680
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1787 on: November 10, 2017, 02:42:28 PM »


Oh wow. This means that Democrats still have plenty of room to grow in the next election. There could be a clear majority by 2019.

Yes. In fact, it would be fair to say Democrats are favored to take back both the state Senate and HoD in 2019 if the election is even half as good as it was this week. They don't have over a dozen incumbents to take out next time around, and because those were almost all Clinton districts, they will be easier to keep. In many ways this was a massive correction on an over-extended GOP that got greedy in the last round  of redistricting.

As it stands now, there are a few Clinton districts and like a half dozen marginal Trump districts Democrats could make serious plays for. As soon as they take complete control, the HoD gerrymander comes down and there will probably be a slew of pro-voter reforms passed.

It would be nice if someone (DDHQ, perhaps?) could come up with a map showing partisan control district-by-district in the Virginia Senate, like we saw with the House of Delegates in the run-up to this Tuesday. 

Here is a map of the current senate - note how Dems really drew the map in their favor in 2010:
https://www.vpap.org/elections/senate/

Here is a map showing Clinton's margin in said seats. Reps hold 3 Clinton districts (10, 12, 13,) and 1 marginal Trump district (7). Of course more could be competitive, but this is purely PVI based.
https://www.vpap.org/visuals/visual/2016-presidential-results-by-senate/


Also, the Dem in HD 27, the hardest seat to flip in a recount has conceded. This now puts the chamber at 49-48 D, with 3 seats heading to probable recounts.

It's highly likely the 394 vote margin for the Dem in HD-85 in VA Beach will hold.  Don't understand why her opponent hasn't conceded yet there.  From there, HD-94 with the 14 vote Republican lead will almost surely be where the action is in the recount and provisionals.  HD-28 with the 84 vote Republican lead is on the outer edge of what could flip in a recount, particularly if there are a lot of provisionals left to be counted.  I would expect the 115 vote lead post-recanvass in HD-40 to hold, so the likeliest outcome is 50D/50R with power sharing as there could be enough heavily Dem leaning provisionals to flip HD-94 before the recount even begins.  Outside chance of 51/49 either way.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1788 on: November 10, 2017, 09:39:33 PM »

Chesterfield County flipped to Northam
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,834
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1789 on: November 10, 2017, 09:51:32 PM »


Cheesy

Even though it won't happen, I wish Caroline and Nelson counties would flip too.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1790 on: November 10, 2017, 09:53:39 PM »


Wow
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1791 on: November 10, 2017, 09:58:12 PM »

#TrumpismIsDead
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,001
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1792 on: November 10, 2017, 10:03:24 PM »

Awesome news about Chesterfield!
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1793 on: November 10, 2017, 10:03:32 PM »


Was waiting for that...

Dominating!
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1794 on: November 10, 2017, 10:17:46 PM »

That suburban Republican curb-stomping comin to an area near you

Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1795 on: November 10, 2017, 10:24:58 PM »

Has a Dem ever carried Chesterfield in a statewide race before this?
Logged
Keep cool-idge
Benjamin Harrison he is w
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,770
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1796 on: November 10, 2017, 10:26:58 PM »

Dang Well Trumpism is DEAD when I said Gillespie would win 48.72%-48.31% I thought that chesterfield would be a 7-11 point victory.
This is just insane!
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1797 on: November 10, 2017, 10:27:37 PM »

Dang Well Trumpism is DEAD when I said Gillespie would win 48.72%-48.31% I thought that chesterfield would be a 7-11 point victory.
This is just insane!

Well your Predictions are trash.

Has a Dem ever carried Chesterfield in a statewide race before this?

Warner 2008

What about before that?
Logged
Keep cool-idge
Benjamin Harrison he is w
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,770
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1798 on: November 10, 2017, 10:27:59 PM »

Has a Dem ever carried Chesterfield in a statewide race before this?

Warner 2008
Northam 2013
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,392
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1799 on: November 10, 2017, 10:28:34 PM »
« Edited: November 10, 2017, 10:32:17 PM by heatcharger »

Has a Dem ever carried Chesterfield in a statewide race before this?

In the post-Nixon era Virginia, Northam in 2013 when he won statewide by 12%; Mark Warner in 2008, when he won statewide by 32%; Chuck Robb in 1988, when he won statewide by 41%; Mary Sue Terry in 1985 and 1989 when she won statewide by 23% and 27% respectively.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 9 queries.