2016: Mark Cuban vs. Hillary Clinton
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:34:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2016: Mark Cuban vs. Hillary Clinton
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016: Mark Cuban vs. Hillary Clinton  (Read 634 times)
FDB
Guest
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 26, 2017, 06:18:34 PM »

deleted
Logged
The Govanah Jake
Jake Jewvinivisk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,234


Political Matrix
E: -2.39, S: -5.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2017, 07:24:26 PM »

Does Mark Cuban run as a Social Liberal/Centrist or SoCon? Because if he ran on the former then he would have a very hard time winning the republican primary. But lets say he does make it through and his final form is one of Fiscal Conservatism and Social Centrism. He is a Free Trader and hold's many of the same Globalist position many Trumpists complain about and are correct on in regards to people like the Bushes and Mitt Romney. So his strategy would be different from the Trump Strategy. He would probably need to focus more on the traditional path through the Suburbs. But he could form a hybrid between the both, not based on policy, but off his personality alone. Him being from Pennsylvania would boost his chances there and i feet he would do better then a Romney or a Bush in the Midwest due to these factors. But i don't think he could win all the states Trump did in the region. As for VP, i think he would need a SoCon and someone from the South or West to balance the ticket. I picked Tom Cotton for the sake of this. Though in the end i believe Mark Cuban would win.



Mark Cuban/Tom Cotton: 292 EVs, 47.92%

Hillary Clinton/Tim Kaine:246 EVs, 47.01%

Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2017, 07:26:31 PM »

2016 U.S Presidential Election:



Mr. Mark Cuban/Gov. Brian Sandoval: 353 Electoral Votes, 52.1%
Fmr. SoS Hillary Clinton/Sen. Elizabeth Warren: 185 Electoral Votes, 45.1%

Mark Cuban wins the Republican Primaries with a libertarian platform, with a populist message. He doesn't say as much outrageous things as Trump, and instead just goes Chris Christie style but still eviscerates "Crooked Hillary". His choice of Sandoval improved Hispanic relations, and Hillary was creamed.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2017, 07:27:44 PM »



Clinton/Warren 216
Cuban/Pence 212
Tossup 110

New Hampshire, Virginia and Florida go to Clinton after recounts, while Cuban wins Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Ohio in close votes/recounts owing to Pence's presence on the ticket, and claiming the Presidency.

IRL, Cuban wasn't going to get past Cruz, Rubio, Bush or Walker. The only rich guy/celeb who could win the GOP nod was Trump.
Logged
Lord Admirale
Admiral President
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,880
United States Minor Outlying Islands


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -0.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2017, 09:49:18 PM »



Cuban/Paul def. Clinton/Kaine 337-201
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2017, 11:28:50 PM »


324: Mark Cuban/Brian Sandoval - 48.7%
214: Hillary Clinton/Martin Heinrich - 43.0%
David Cobb/Jill Stein - 4.0%
Evan McMullin/David French - 3.2%
Others - 1.1%

Cuban might also pick Nikki Haley, Condi Rice, Joni Ernst, Kelly Ayotte, Mitch Daniels, Tim Scott, or Marco Rubio, but I feel like Sandoval would be most likely.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2017, 11:35:50 PM »


324: Mark Cuban/Brian Sandoval - 48.7%
214: Hillary Clinton/Martin Heinrich - 43.0%
David Cobb/Jill Stein - 4.0%
Evan McMullin/David French - 3.2%
Others - 1.1%

Cuban might also pick Nikki Haley, Condi Rice, Joni Ernst, Kelly Ayotte, Mitch Daniels, Tim Scott, or Marco Rubio, but I feel like Sandoval would be most likely.

No Republican is picking a pro-choice, pro same-sex marriage individual like Sandoval to serve as his running mate.

Sandoval won't get anywhere near the GOP ticket...ever. His long-term goal should be a  nomination to replace Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court under a Democratic President, should something happen to Thomas.
Logged
HisGrace
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,557
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2017, 04:06:44 PM »

About the same map as Trump. Cuban might have even picked up NH or Minnesota.
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,779


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2017, 05:52:30 PM »

Mark Cuban loses, I think a lot of Republicans would stay home
Logged
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,630
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2017, 05:54:43 PM »



278-260 Cuban
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 14 queries.