Which of these would you vote to confirm in a theoretical Republican Cabinet?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 04:46:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Which of these would you vote to confirm in a theoretical Republican Cabinet?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of these would you vote to confirm
#1
State: Jeff Flake		  
#2
Treasury: Mitt Romney		  
#3
Defense: Jim Webb		  
#4
Attorney General: Brian Sandoval		  
#5
Interior: Lynn Scarlett		  
#6
Agriculture: Mike Conaway		  
#7
Commerce: Larry Ellison		  
#8
Labor: Mark Kirk		  
#9
HHS: Bruce Rauner		  
#10
HUD: Betsy Price		  
#11
Education: Mitch Daniels		  
#12
Energy: Lisa Murkowski		  
#13
Transportation: Don Young		  
#14
Veterans Affairs: Steve Russell		  
#15
Homeland Security: Joe Lieberman		  
#16
OMB Director: Mark Sanford		  
#17
EPA Head: Arnold Schwarzenegger		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 20

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which of these would you vote to confirm in a theoretical Republican Cabinet?  (Read 296 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,743


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 18, 2017, 02:43:24 AM »
Which of these nominees would you vote to confirm
Logged
America Needs R'hllor
Parrotguy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,443
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2017, 02:48:38 AM »
Everyone other than Ellison and Sanford.
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2017, 02:49:17 AM »
The Governator, Murkowski, Sandoval, and Kirk.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2017, 05:14:37 AM »
Mark Kirk? The poor guy definitely isn't capable of this anymore, unfortunately.

I don't know some of them, but would not confirm Kirk (despite liking him) and RINO Jeff Flake.
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,779


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2017, 05:55:01 AM »
Right, there are some names here I don't know but I'd probably vote to confirm everyone I do know except Flake (probably too neocon) and Sanford
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,743


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2017, 01:56:48 PM »
Quote from: Kamala Claus on November 18, 2017, 02:49:17 AM
The Governator, Murkowski, Sandoval, and Kirk.

You wouldnt vote to confirm Webb , Flake, or Daniels
Logged
America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗
TexArkana
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2017, 01:58:46 PM »
All of them, except for maybe Mark Sanford.
Logged
The Govanah Jake
Jake Jewvinivisk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,234


Political Matrix
E: -2.39, S: -5.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2017, 02:02:31 PM »
Webb, Kirk, Rauner, Murkowski.
Logged
P. Clodius Pulcher did nothing wrong
razze
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,078
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -4.96


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2017, 02:11:26 PM »
Tbh not a bad Cabinet. If a Republican president chose these people I would be slightly disappointed that they aren't as liberal as I would like, but I wouldn't be terrified for the future like I am with the current Cabinet
Logged
Illiniwek
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,910
Vatican City State



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2017, 02:14:52 PM »
« Edited: November 18, 2017, 10:34:36 PM by Representative Illiniwek »

Oo and Rauner too
Logged
TPIG
ThatConservativeGuy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 1.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2017, 03:16:52 PM »
This is a very strong cabinet. The only ones I voted against are Mark Sanford and Don Young. I don't think Sanford is qualified to run the OMB, and Young (ironically) is simply too old to be the head of an executive department, although I think he'd do a fine job as Sec. of Transportation.
Logged
SATW
SunriseAroundTheWorld
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,463
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2017, 05:17:46 PM »
I'd support:

Romney
Conaway
Ellison
Kirk
Russell
Lieberman
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2017, 06:02:56 PM »
Quote from: Old School Republican on November 18, 2017, 01:56:48 PM
Quote from: Kamala Claus on November 18, 2017, 02:49:17 AM
The Governator, Murkowski, Sandoval, and Kirk.

You wouldnt vote to confirm Webb , Flake, or Daniels

Webb and Flake are too neocon-y, and I don't trust politicians or donors as the Secretary of Education. 
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,684
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2017, 06:47:46 PM »
Quote from: Kamala Claus on November 18, 2017, 06:02:56 PM
Quote from: Old School Republican on November 18, 2017, 01:56:48 PM
Quote from: Kamala Claus on November 18, 2017, 02:49:17 AM
The Governator, Murkowski, Sandoval, and Kirk.

You wouldnt vote to confirm Webb , Flake, or Daniels

Webb and Flake are too neocon-y, and I don't trust politicians or donors as the Secretary of Education. 

If Flake and Webb are neocons that word has no meaning.
Logged
SATW
SunriseAroundTheWorld
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,463
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2017, 07:55:49 PM »
Quote from: shua on November 18, 2017, 06:47:46 PM
Quote from: Kamala Claus on November 18, 2017, 06:02:56 PM
Quote from: Old School Republican on November 18, 2017, 01:56:48 PM
Quote from: Kamala Claus on November 18, 2017, 02:49:17 AM
The Governator, Murkowski, Sandoval, and Kirk.

You wouldnt vote to confirm Webb , Flake, or Daniels

Webb and Flake are too neocon-y, and I don't trust politicians or donors as the Secretary of Education. 

If Flake and Webb are neocons that word has no meaning.

Yea, calling Flake and Webb neocons is a very crazy statement.

As a neocon, I specifically would oppose both because of my disagreements w/ the two on foreign policy.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 18, 2017, 10:27:37 PM »
Not Conaway, Ellison, Rauner, or Sanford.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 14 queries.