Opinion of texarkana

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

better than lame-os who start "opinion of" threads any time someone does or says something they don't like.

I like this guy. FF.

[fhtagn]

putting a. .. sleazy photo in your sig?

OMG. #SlutShaming

Here's to hoping she doesn't call herself a feminist.

[fhtagn]

Needs to change signature ASAP.

This, definitely.

I was told by a mod that it's fine, after I cropped it to remove the name of the porn site.

Im always fine with tits.

#FreeTheTits
#Feminism

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

putting a. .. sleazy photo in your sig?

OMG. #SlutShaming

Here's to hoping she doesn't call herself a feminist.

To me, feminism means that a woman is free to do whatever she wants. So I don't see why a porn star can't also be a feminist.

[fhtagn]

putting a. .. sleazy photo in your sig?

OMG. #SlutShaming

Here's to hoping she doesn't call herself a feminist.

To me, feminism means that a woman is free to do whatever she wants. So I don't see why a porn star can't also be a feminist.

I was talking about omegascarlet saying the photo was sleazy

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

putting a. .. sleazy photo in your sig?

OMG. #SlutShaming

Here's to hoping she doesn't call herself a feminist.

To me, feminism means that a woman is free to do whatever she wants. So I don't see why a porn star can't also be a feminist.

I was talking about omegascarlet saying the photo was sleazy

Then I would agree with you completely.

[Statilius the Epicurean]

Definitely a paedophile and I'm not even joking

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Definitely a paedophile and I'm not even joking

That's a slanderous thing to say, tbh.
As for my comment on legalizing child porn, look at it this way; I also think you should be able to watch ISIS execution videos if you so choose - by your logic this must mean I support ISIS executing people. In the end, molesting children and executing people are both terrible, evil, and repugnant. That doesn't mean I think someone should be punished for viewing them, we should focus on punishing the people who produce such disgusting content rather than the people who merely view it after the fact.

[Statilius the Epicurean]

Definitely a paedophile and I'm not even joking

That's a slanderous thing to say, tbh.
As for my comment on legalizing child porn, look at it this way; I also think you should be able to watch ISIS execution videos if you so choose - by your logic this must mean I support ISIS executing people. In the end, molesting children and executing people are both terrible, evil, and repugnant. That doesn't mean I think someone should be punished for viewing them, we should focus on punishing the people who produce such disgusting content rather than the people who merely view it after the fact.

It's not only your abhorrent view of child porn which makes me certain, but that afterward you have creepily tried to compensate by changing your username and putting a picture of a BIG TITTED MATURE WOMAN HEY LOOK GUYS I ACTUALLY LIKE THE DEVELOPED GIRLS NOT CHILDREN I PROMISE in your signature.

Quite frankly, you make me sick.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Definitely a paedophile and I'm not even joking

That's a slanderous thing to say, tbh.
As for my comment on legalizing child porn, look at it this way; I also think you should be able to watch ISIS execution videos if you so choose - by your logic this must mean I support ISIS executing people. In the end, molesting children and executing people are both terrible, evil, and repugnant. That doesn't mean I think someone should be punished for viewing them, we should focus on punishing the people who produce such disgusting content rather than the people who merely view it after the fact.

It's not only your abhorrent view of child porn which makes me certain, but that afterward you have creepily tried to compensate by changing your username and putting a picture of a BIG TITTED MATURE WOMAN HEY LOOK GUYS I ACTUALLY LIKE THE DEVELOPED GIRLS NOT CHILDREN I PROMISE in your signature.

Quite frankly, you make me sick.

I see how you could interpret it that way, but I was planning on changing my name and signature before but couldn't be bothered to do it until recently. Also, I really don't care if you think I'm a pedophile because in my heart I know I am not, and anyone who knows me in real life would tell you the same thing. Pedophilia is one of the absolute worst crimes imaginable, and it sickens me just as much as it sickens you.

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

...and people say the West will win because of the strength of our “values”.

I would argue that idolizing porn stars is uniquely Western, you would be arrested or worse for this kind of thing in many countries.

The west has a lot to learn from these other countries.

[they don't love you like i love you]

The fact that a woman has a right to appear in porn is not really the issue here. Supporting a woman's right to appear in any type of video or photo does not have to translate into it being OK to splash that picture around on a forum dedicated to completely unrelated topics.

[fhtagn]

The fact that a woman has a right to appear in porn is not really the issue here. Supporting a woman's right to appear in any type of video or photo does not have to translate into it being OK to splash that picture around on a forum dedicated to completely unrelated topics.

Except there's nothing wrong with the photo. It covers up much more than some folks would see on the beach or walking around in public on a hot day. Plenty of folks have photos in their sigs of things completely unrelated to this forum, how is this any different? Because curvy women make you uncomfortable?

The wording of the photo as "sleazy" is also the issue here. Coming from posters who likely claim elsewhere that they are feminists or at least care about womens' issues: it's hypocritical. 

[Mr. Reactionary]

The fact that a woman has a right to appear in porn is not really the issue here. Supporting a woman's right to appear in any type of video or photo does not have to translate into it being OK to splash that picture around on a forum dedicated to completely unrelated topics.

Except there's nothing wrong with the photo. It covers up much more than some folks would see on the beach or walking around in public on a hot day. Plenty of folks have photos in their sigs of things completely unrelated to this forum, how is this any different? Because curvy women make you uncomfortable?

The wording of the photo as "sleazy" is also the issue here. Coming from posters who likely claim elsewhere that they are feminists or at least care about womens' issues: it's hypocritical. 

And RACIST!!!!!

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

...and people say the West will win because of the strength of our “values”.

I would argue that idolizing porn stars is uniquely Western, you would be arrested or worse for this kind of thing in many countries.

The west has a lot to learn from these other countries.

Whether you like it or not, porn is as American as apple pie. And it's part of what makes America great if you ask me.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

...and people say the West will win because of the strength of our “values”.

I would argue that idolizing porn stars is uniquely Western, you would be arrested or worse for this kind of thing in many countries.

That’s my point. The degeneracy must be stemmed.

You can't get rid of "degeneracy" unless you're also willing to trample on the 1st amendment.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

The fact that a woman has a right to appear in porn is not really the issue here. Supporting a woman's right to appear in any type of video or photo does not have to translate into it being OK to splash that picture around on a forum dedicated to completely unrelated topics.

Except there's nothing wrong with the photo. It covers up much more than some folks would see on the beach or walking around in public on a hot day. Plenty of folks have photos in their sigs of things completely unrelated to this forum, how is this any different? Because curvy women make you uncomfortable?

The wording of the photo as "sleazy" is also the issue here. Coming from posters who likely claim elsewhere that they are feminists or at least care about womens' issues: it's hypocritical. 

I just want to thank you for being the only poster here to really defend me. You're a brave soul.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

It should not take this long to put a problem spam poster on mute, and the url was hardly the full problem. I just reported it as an aggravating circumstance to the fact that pornography is literally on every page on the forum. This must be what Dave always dreamed of.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

It should not take this long to put a problem spam poster on mute, and the url was hardly the full problem. I just reported it as an aggravating circumstance to the fact that pornography is literally on every page on the forum. This must be what Dave always dreamed of.

If the picture in my signature is pornography, than anything even remotely sexually suggestive is porn.

[TPIG]

...and people say the West will win because of the strength of our “values”.

I would argue that idolizing porn stars is uniquely Western, you would be arrested or worse for this kind of thing in many countries.

The west has a lot to learn from these other countries.

Whether you like it or not, porn is as American as apple pie. And it's part of what makes America great if you ask me.

That's absurd. Of course, people have a right to look at pornography, but to say that something so destructive to moral and sexual health for so many people is what makes America great is frankly ridiculous.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

...and people say the West will win because of the strength of our “values”.

I would argue that idolizing porn stars is uniquely Western, you would be arrested or worse for this kind of thing in many countries.

The west has a lot to learn from these other countries.

Whether you like it or not, porn is as American as apple pie. And it's part of what makes America great if you ask me.

That's absurd. Of course, people have a right to look at pornography, but to say that something so destructive to moral and sexual health for so many people is what makes America great is frankly ridiculous.

Let me rephrase; the fact that people are free to view "offensive" content (like porn), without fear of being arrested or worse, is part of what makes America great.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

One of the well known rules about these threads is the subject of them doesn't engage those who post their opinions.  A couple of comments at the end, maybe, but not this constant back and forth.

This alone makes him iggy worthy and a horrible Atlasian.

[they don't love you like i love you]

The fact that a woman has a right to appear in porn is not really the issue here. Supporting a woman's right to appear in any type of video or photo does not have to translate into it being OK to splash that picture around on a forum dedicated to completely unrelated topics.

Except there's nothing wrong with the photo. It covers up much more than some folks would see on the beach or walking around in public on a hot day. Plenty of folks have photos in their sigs of things completely unrelated to this forum, how is this any different? Because curvy women make you uncomfortable?

The wording of the photo as "sleazy" is also the issue here. Coming from posters who likely claim elsewhere that they are feminists or at least care about womens' issues: it's hypocritical. 

That pic is the reason I'm only browsing the forum at work on mobile mode so sigs aren't visible now. Most pics in dogs on-related to the forum or politics don't require me to do that to hide them.

If the pic is no different from what people wear on the beach, why is it on a porn site? Perhaps there's more to how suggestive a pic is than simply the amount of skin exposed? There's thousands of artistic style fully nude pics less suggestive than that one.

"Because curvy women make you uncomfortable?" Oh wow, F[INKS] YOU. You clearly know nothing about my taste in women and frankly that's not only an absurd strawman but insulting.

Also what Statilius said.

[America Needs R'hllor]

Needs to change signature ASAP.

This, definitely.

THIS. It's seriously so annoying- I'm probably going to start an ignore policy on whoever has a signature of objectifying nature. This is supposed to be a forum I can browse at work\uni, not a goddamn pornographic site.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Needs to change signature ASAP.

This, definitely.

THIS. It's seriously so annoying- I'm probably going to start an ignore policy on whoever has a signature of objectifying nature.

You won't like Grumpy Santa's helpers next week so you might want to iggie me now.