Opinion of texarkana

[Virginiá]

Really TexArkana? That is even less tasteful than the last one. This is the kind of stuff you want below every single one of your posts on a political forum?

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Really TexArkana? That is even less tasteful than the last one. This is the kind of stuff you want below every single one of your posts on a political forum?

Are the pictures actually less tasteful or is it the "America's Sweetheart" sprawled across them?

[Virginiá]

The signature area on a political forum is not where you are supposed to put pictures that give you erections.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

The signature area on a political forum is not where you are supposed to put pictures that give you erections.

This is true, but again, they're not pornographic and they're not against any rules. and I have them in my signature to go along with this persona, which I'll likely change within a month at the most.

[Bidenworth2020]

The signature area on a political forum is not where you are supposed to put pictures that give you erections.

nobody ever got an erection from those pictures

anyway, generally a good poster, creepy sig tho

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Please mute this jerk

[wxtransit]

If ever a thread needed locked.....ahem. 

Rapidement, s'il vous plait

It wouldn't be illegal or against the forum rules for me to put a big picture of a poo in my signature, but its not something that I've ever do: just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Please mute this jerk

[Virginiá]

The signature area on a political forum is not where you are supposed to put pictures that give you erections.

This is true, but again, they're not pornographic and they're not against any rules. and I have them in my signature to go along with this persona, which I'll likely change within a month at the most.

I feel like you're digging a hole for yourself here, and you're being kinda stubborn about it. The blowback from your comment in the unpopular opinions thread was certainly going to be swift, but then you started this porn signature thing right after as an obvious response to it and it's kind of strange. I don't get why you don't just drop all of this. It's like you are trying to get people here to either hate you or think you are really weird.

But whatever, you do what you need to do.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

The signature area on a political forum is not where you are supposed to put pictures that give you erections.

This is true, but again, they're not pornographic and they're not against any rules. and I have them in my signature to go along with this persona, which I'll likely change within a month at the most.

I feel like you're digging a hole for yourself here, and you're being kinda stubborn about it. The blowback from your comment in the unpopular opinions thread was certainly going to be swift, but then you started this porn signature thing right after as an obvious response to it and it's kind of strange. I don't get why you don't just drop all of this. It's like you are trying to get people here to either hate you or think you are really weird.

But whatever, you do what you need to do.

Per fhtagn's advice, I changed it to a classier picture. Which she made for me.

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

Per fhtagn's advice, I changed it to a classier picture. Which he made for me.

He's a she, assuming you're talking about Frank.

[fhtagn]

The signature area on a political forum is not where you are supposed to put pictures that give you erections.

This is true, but again, they're not pornographic and they're not against any rules. and I have them in my signature to go along with this persona, which I'll likely change within a month at the most.

I feel like you're digging a hole for yourself here, and you're being kinda stubborn about it. The blowback from your comment in the unpopular opinions thread was certainly going to be swift, but then you started this porn signature thing right after as an obvious response to it and it's kind of strange. I don't get why you don't just drop all of this. It's like you are trying to get people here to either hate you or think you are really weird.

But whatever, you do what you need to do.

Per fhtagn's advice, I changed it to a classier picture. Which he made for me.

*she


And to be fair, I still think most folks are making a bigger deal out of it than it really is.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

The signature area on a political forum is not where you are supposed to put pictures that give you erections.

This is true, but again, they're not pornographic and they're not against any rules. and I have them in my signature to go along with this persona, which I'll likely change within a month at the most.

I feel like you're digging a hole for yourself here, and you're being kinda stubborn about it. The blowback from your comment in the unpopular opinions thread was certainly going to be swift, but then you started this porn signature thing right after as an obvious response to it and it's kind of strange. I don't get why you don't just drop all of this. It's like you are trying to get people here to either hate you or think you are really weird.

But whatever, you do what you need to do.

Per fhtagn's advice, I changed it to a classier picture. Which he made for me.

*she


And to be fair, I still think most folks are making a bigger deal out of it than it really is.

Oops, sorry for assuming you were a dude. I didn't think there were actually any females on here. And I totally agree with you on people blowing it out of proportion.

[Orthogonian Society Treasurer]

Is it really too much to ask that, at the very least, one be ashamed of their pornography consumption?

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Is it really too much to ask that, at the very least, one be ashamed of their pornography consumption?

Life's too short to be ashamed.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Per fhtagn's advice, I changed it to a classier picture. Which he made for me.

He's a she, assuming you're talking about Frank.

Yeah, my bad. I just assume that everyone on here is male until proven otherwise lol.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

Is it really too much to ask that, at the very least, one be ashamed of their pornography consumption?

Life's too short to be ashamed.

Life’s too short for pornography.

[💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)]

Holy moly, does half of this board live in the 1700s?

This porn stuff is not my scene but people are overreacting. Good poster.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Holy moly, does half of this board live in the 1700s?

This porn stuff is not my scene but people are overreacting. Good poster.

I mean, even a user whose name is literally Mr. Reactionary defended me.

[KingSweden]

The guy is so edgy he’s defended child porn and Daesh beheading videos. I think that about sums it up

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

The guy is so edgy he’s defended child porn and Daesh beheading videos. I think that about sums it up

I defended neither. I merely defended what I perceive as your right to view such content, as despicable as it is.

[fhtagn]

The guy is so edgy he’s defended child porn and Daesh beheading videos. I think that about sums it up

I defended neither. I merely defended what I perceive as your right to view such content, as despicable as it is.

how are Daesh beheading videos any different than what you'd see on gore sites? a lot of which is perfectly legal?

(not saying either is okay, nor is it even remotely something I'm interested in, just asking a general question).

[TPIG]

The guy is so edgy he’s defended child porn and Daesh beheading videos. I think that about sums it up

I defended neither. I merely defended what I perceive as your right to view such content, as despicable as it is.

In defending/supporting people's right to view child pornography, you're encouraging its further production, thus leading to increased exploitation of children. No child can truly consent to the acts forced upon them in those videos, and that alone should make the possession/viewing of it illegal. It's not like the issue of prostitution (or other similar issues) where one can claim that if the industry was made legal, standards would be improved and the rights of those involved would be better protected; child pornography, by its very existence, violates the rights of children because again, consent isn't possible. Therefore, it should be unequivocally banned in both production and viewership.  

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

The guy is so edgy he’s defended child porn and Daesh beheading videos. I think that about sums it up

I defended neither. I merely defended what I perceive as your right to view such content, as despicable as it is.

how are Daesh beheading videos any different than what you'd see on gore sites? a lot of which is perfectly legal?

(not saying either is okay, nor is it even remotely something I'm interested in, just asking a general question).

That was the point I was making. Children are physically harmed in the making of child porn, and people are physically harmed in the making of terrorist propaganda videos as well. And by watching either you're satisfying a demand for that kind of content, and for more to be produced. That's why I think both should be legal to view.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

In addition to being creepy as hell, he's also an insufferable spammer. He's posted almost 700 times in November so far.