In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:41:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: In hindsight, who should the Democrats have nominated in 2016?  (Read 12428 times)
Former Kentuckian
Cal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,166


« on: November 27, 2017, 09:10:55 PM »
« edited: November 27, 2017, 09:13:34 PM by Cal »

I wish the field hadn't cleared like spooked cattle because of Clinton because we really should have had a full primary slate with more than five candidates (and only two with any support). I'll never not feel weird about how Clinton was pushed as inevitable by the Dems even before anyone else announced (like that letter all the female Dem senators wrote in 2013 pledging their support to her). I would have loved to have seen what the younger candidates without 30 years of Clinton baggage would have had to offer and how they could have stood up to Trump.
Logged
Former Kentuckian
Cal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,166


« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2017, 05:16:16 PM »

Hillary Clinton. She performed better than any other Democrat would have against Trump.

This literally made me laugh a little
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.