Kentucky 1896
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 06:34:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Kentucky 1896
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Kentucky 1896  (Read 766 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,627


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 03, 2017, 10:31:20 PM »

why did Kentucky vote for the GOP in 1896 but not in 1900 or 1904 which were far bigger GOP wins.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,519
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2017, 11:36:39 PM »
« Edited: December 03, 2017, 11:39:34 PM by TDAS04 »

Kentucky was very close in all of those elections, and McKinely carried most of the border states.  In addition, most of the East swung Republican in 1896.  The East trended the opposite direction in 1900.

Actually, Kentucky never had very lopsided results during the “Solid South” era, except for the 1864 and 1868 Democratic landslides.  Not sure if FDR even managed to crack 60%.

In fact—fun fact—Donald Trump carried Kentucky a larger margin (30 points) than any other presidential candidate since Horatio Seymour carried the state by 49. (Similar to how Trump’s margin of victory was greater in West Virginia than any other presidential candidate’s in history.)
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,677
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2017, 04:33:08 PM »

Some of it is Palmer Democrats returning to the fold.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,936
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 21, 2020, 07:22:29 AM »

According to Menendez's Geography of Presidential Elections, McKinley was the first Republican to win traditionally Democratic Jefferson County (Louisville), and he did so with more then 60% of the vote. This, together with the diversion of some Democratic support to John Palmer and strong McKinley margins in traditionally Republican Southeast Kentucky, is why he was able to narrowly carry the state. In 1900, McKinley held Jefferson County, but Bryan regained much of the previous Democratic support there, which was enough for him to regain the state.

Kentucky was very close in all of those elections, and McKinely carried most of the border states.  In addition, most of the East swung Republican in 1896.  The East trended the opposite direction in 1900.

Actually, Kentucky never had very lopsided results during the “Solid South” era, except for the 1864 and 1868 Democratic landslides.  Not sure if FDR even managed to crack 60%.

In fact—fun fact—Donald Trump carried Kentucky a larger margin (30 points) than any other presidential candidate since Horatio Seymour carried the state by 49. (Similar to how Trump’s margin of victory was greater in West Virginia than any other presidential candidate’s in history.)

This is true, although Lyndon Johnson received a higher percentage than Trump in both states, in 1964. Roosevelt never did break 60% in Kentucky (the best that he did there was 59.06% against Hoover in 1932), and Johnson's 64.01% was the best Democratic performance in Kentucky since Seymour in 1868.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.