"National Republican" vs. "Whig"
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 11:14:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  "National Republican" vs. "Whig"
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "National Republican" vs. "Whig"  (Read 725 times)
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,437
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 04, 2017, 04:20:35 AM »

Why were John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay called "National Republicans" in 1828 and 1832 yet were called "Whigs" in subsequent elections? Why the name change?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2017, 08:40:45 PM »

Both the Jacksonians and the anti-Jacksonians were trying to claim the heritage of the Republican Party of Jefferson.  (Calling Jefferson's party the Democratic-Republican Party is about as historically accurate as referring to the post-Justinian Roman Empire as the Byzantine Empire.) The Anti-Jacksonians tried to broaden the party to be more than a faction of former Republicans by changing the name.  Associating themselves with the name Whig (which historically was an anti-monarchial name in its various incarnations) also served to indicate they thought Jackson was acting like a king instead of a president.  So the Whig Party was opposed to King Jackson.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2017, 09:19:21 PM »
« Edited: December 05, 2017, 09:22:40 PM by People's Speaker North Carolina Yankee »

Both the Jacksonians and the anti-Jacksonians were trying to claim the heritage of the Republican Party of Jefferson.  (Calling Jefferson's party the Democratic-Republican Party is about as historically accurate as referring to the post-Justinian Roman Empire as the Byzantine Empire.) The Anti-Jacksonians tried to broaden the party to be more than a faction of former Republicans by changing the name. Associating themselves with the name Whig (which historically was an anti-monarchial name in its various incarnations) also served to indicate they thought Jackson was acting like a king instead of a president.  So the Whig Party was opposed to King Jackson.

That also sowed the seeds of their downfall:



I really like this book on the subject.

About the same time that the name was adopted, was when you had people come over to the party who were "State's Rights" Whigs like White and Tyler, who disagreed with the core of "National Republicans" who largely agreed on support for tariffs, bank etc.

Another interesting dynamic was the influx of Anti-Masonic people into the Party, as well.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,437
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2017, 03:07:54 PM »

Another interesting dynamic was the influx of Anti-Masonic people into the Party, as well.
This is where William Seward and Thurlow Weed came from.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.