NRSC Refuses to endorse Roy Moore

[OSR stands with Israel]

http://www.weeklystandard.com/cory-gardner-the-nrsc-will-never-endorse-roy-moore/article/2010758

Good on the NSRC , and thank god they still have principles. Roy Moore is evil and should never be a senator no matter what.

[Dr. Arch]

Color me surprised at both this statement and your position.

[junior chįmp]

RNC gave rapin' Roy $170K

The GOP is a bunch of phonies trying to play both sides.

Never trust the Republicans

[Sestak]

Gardner is being surprisingly resilient on this. Good on him.

[junior chįmp]

Gardner is being surprisingly resilient on this. Good on him.

It's all for show. They're trying to appear like they are against him while simultaneously sending him money.

Remember Jason Chafass saying he couldn't look his daughter in the eye and vote for Trump. What a joke

Dems gotta stop being nice. Trust no Republican politician. Period

[OSR stands with Israel]

Dude the President of the United States just held a rally for a child molester. Stop acting like your party has any credibility whatsoever on morality. The NRSC is just maintaining this position just because Trump is covering for them.

Trump isnt an establishment Republican , and the RNC is the president's puppet. The Establishment still represents the GOP more than the Trump win do and thats a good thing.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Dude the President of the United States just held a rally for a child molester. Stop acting like your party has any credibility whatsoever on morality. The NRSC is just maintaining this position just because Trump is covering for them.

Trump isnt an establishment Republican , and the RNC is the president's puppet. The Establishment still represents the GOP more than the Trump win do and thats a good thing.

Yes. The President is not establishment. Oh my God I get stupider on Atlas.

No Paul Ryan is Establishment, and the politicians supported by top GOP congressional leaders and GOP donors during the the primaries are the Establishment.


Bernie Sanders wouldnt be part of the establishment either if he won and neither is Trump.

[Sestak]

Dude the President of the United States just held a rally for a child molester. Stop acting like your party has any credibility whatsoever on morality. The NRSC is just maintaining this position just because Trump is covering for them.

Trump isnt an establishment Republican , and the RNC is the president's puppet. The Establishment still represents the GOP more than the Trump win do and thats a good thing.

Yes. The President is not establishment. Oh my God I get stupider on Atlas.

Trump is most certainly not part of the "establishment faction" of the party. You cannot deny that there is a faction of the GOP which is disgusted with Trump/Moore. Gardner refusing to fund Moore is a good thing, and when people, even people we don't like, do good things, they deserve acknowledgement.

[TheSaint250]

Good for the NRSC. Hopefully Gardner sticks to his word and pushes for Moore to be expelled

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

An empty gesture just like when Ryan "unendorsed" Trump in the last months of campaign. They still rather have a child molester in the Senate, as long as he's a Republican. Moore is going to win due to party identity. Ivey's stance ("I don't disbelief the accusers, but I'll vote Republican anyway") doesn't need further elaboration.

In 1990 Republicans not only disowned David Duke when he advanced to the runoff as a "Republican". They actually worked to prevent his election. Here we just have a "well, we're just looking elsewhere" case.

[Fuzzy Says: "Abolish NPR!"]

I would not advocate Moore's expulsion (assuming he's elected), based on unproven allegations.  It's a situation that will resolve itself in 2020; I'd be confident of that.

I don't think people have fully thought through the consequences of expelling Moore after the electorate chooses him to fill a vacancy.  Where would this stop?  And is the Senate going to drop everything to "investigate" Roy Moore? 

Allowing the electorate to handle this situation, now, and in 2020, would be a big step toward becoming a serious nation again.

[Inmate Trump]

I would not advocate Moore's expulsion (assuming he's elected), based on unproven allegations.  It's a situation that will resolve itself in 2020; I'd be confident of that.

I don't think people have fully thought through the consequences of expelling Moore after the electorate chooses him to fill a vacancy.  Where would this stop?  And is the Senate going to drop everything to "investigate" Roy Moore? 

Allowing the electorate to handle this situation, now, and in 2020, would be a big step toward becoming a serious nation again.

Please just stop.

We get it.  You support a child predator simply on the fact he is not a Democrat.  Which is weird, because you also claim to possess Christian values but whatever.

[RINO Tom]

Good for the NRSC. Hopefully Gardner sticks to his word and pushes for Moore to be expelled

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

Good for the NRSC. Hopefully Gardner sticks to his word and pushes for Moore to be expelled

[Antonio the Sixth]

An empty gesture just like when Ryan "unendorsed" Trump in the last months of campaign. They still rather have a child molester in the Senate, as long as he's a Republican. Moore is going to win due to party identity. Ivey's stance ("I don't disbelief the accusers, but I'll vote Republican anyway") doesn't need further elaboration.

In 1990 Republicans not only disowned David Duke when he advanced to the runoff as a "Republican". They actually worked to prevent his election. Here we just have a "well, we're just looking elsewhere" case.

If David Duke ran today, he'd have the full GOP behind him.

[OSR stands with Israel]

An empty gesture just like when Ryan "unendorsed" Trump in the last months of campaign. They still rather have a child molester in the Senate, as long as he's a Republican. Moore is going to win due to party identity. Ivey's stance ("I don't disbelief the accusers, but I'll vote Republican anyway") doesn't need further elaboration.

In 1990 Republicans not only disowned David Duke when he advanced to the runoff as a "Republican". They actually worked to prevent his election. Here we just have a "well, we're just looking elsewhere" case.

If David Duke ran today, he'd have the full GOP behind him.

no he wouldnt

[Sestak]

An empty gesture just like when Ryan "unendorsed" Trump in the last months of campaign. They still rather have a child molester in the Senate, as long as he's a Republican. Moore is going to win due to party identity. Ivey's stance ("I don't disbelief the accusers, but I'll vote Republican anyway") doesn't need further elaboration.

In 1990 Republicans not only disowned David Duke when he advanced to the runoff as a "Republican". They actually worked to prevent his election. Here we just have a "well, we're just looking elsewhere" case.

If David Duke ran today, he'd have the full GOP behind him.

He ran for Senate last year, remember?? And he didn't.

[IceSpear]

An empty gesture just like when Ryan "unendorsed" Trump in the last months of campaign. They still rather have a child molester in the Senate, as long as he's a Republican. Moore is going to win due to party identity. Ivey's stance ("I don't disbelief the accusers, but I'll vote Republican anyway") doesn't need further elaboration.

In 1990 Republicans not only disowned David Duke when he advanced to the runoff as a "Republican". They actually worked to prevent his election. Here we just have a "well, we're just looking elsewhere" case.

If David Duke ran today, he'd have the full GOP behind him.

He ran for Senate last year, remember?? And he didn't.

We never saw what would happen if the only choice was between Duke and a Democrat though. He'd probably lose narrowly, since Louisiana isn't as deplorable as Alabama.

[Antonio the Sixth]

An empty gesture just like when Ryan "unendorsed" Trump in the last months of campaign. They still rather have a child molester in the Senate, as long as he's a Republican. Moore is going to win due to party identity. Ivey's stance ("I don't disbelief the accusers, but I'll vote Republican anyway") doesn't need further elaboration.

In 1990 Republicans not only disowned David Duke when he advanced to the runoff as a "Republican". They actually worked to prevent his election. Here we just have a "well, we're just looking elsewhere" case.

If David Duke ran today, he'd have the full GOP behind him.

He ran for Senate last year, remember?? And he didn't.

He wasn't the GOP nominee. You know what I meant.

[Figueira]

Gardner would be even more DOA in Colorado if he caved on this one.

[America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗]

An empty gesture just like when Ryan "unendorsed" Trump in the last months of campaign. They still rather have a child molester in the Senate, as long as he's a Republican. Moore is going to win due to party identity. Ivey's stance ("I don't disbelief the accusers, but I'll vote Republican anyway") doesn't need further elaboration.

In 1990 Republicans not only disowned David Duke when he advanced to the runoff as a "Republican". They actually worked to prevent his election. Here we just have a "well, we're just looking elsewhere" case.

If David Duke ran today, he'd have the full GOP behind him.

He ran for Senate last year, remember?? And he didn't.

We never saw what would happen if the only choice was between Duke and a Democrat though. He'd probably lose narrowly, since Louisiana isn't as deplorable as Alabama.

Yeah. It's easy to say they wouldn't in a situation where a scary Democrat isn't his only oponent.

No prominent Republican is going to endorse an actual neo-Nazi.

[Inmate Trump]

An empty gesture just like when Ryan "unendorsed" Trump in the last months of campaign. They still rather have a child molester in the Senate, as long as he's a Republican. Moore is going to win due to party identity. Ivey's stance ("I don't disbelief the accusers, but I'll vote Republican anyway") doesn't need further elaboration.

In 1990 Republicans not only disowned David Duke when he advanced to the runoff as a "Republican". They actually worked to prevent his election. Here we just have a "well, we're just looking elsewhere" case.

If David Duke ran today, he'd have the full GOP behind him.

He ran for Senate last year, remember?? And he didn't.

We never saw what would happen if the only choice was between Duke and a Democrat though. He'd probably lose narrowly, since Louisiana isn't as deplorable as Alabama.

Yeah. It's easy to say they wouldn't in a situation where a scary Democrat isn't his only oponent.

No prominent Republican is going to endorse an actual neo-Nazi.

People were saying that about the President and a child molester I'm sure. But everyone wants to keep giving the modern GOP the benefit of the doubt for some reason.

Before 2016, I would say the GOP wouldn’t back such a candidate.

After 2016, I’m certain they would.

They are the party of good morals and good values no longer. They absolutely would hand over their full support to a Neo-Nazi candidate if the contest was between him/her and a Democrat.

[Yank2133]

Dude the President of the United States just held a rally for a child molester. Stop acting like your party has any credibility whatsoever on morality. The NRSC is just maintaining this position just because Trump is covering for them.

Trump isnt an establishment Republican , and the RNC is the president's puppet. The Establishment still represents the GOP more than the Trump win do and thats a good thing.

Yes. The President is not establishment. Oh my God I get stupider on Atlas.

Seriously.

Trump is the face of the GOP. Every president becomes the defacto head the party once elected. Establishment R's want to have it both ways, they want DT to sign their bills, but they want to act like he is a separate entity from them.

[OSR stands with Israel]

An empty gesture just like when Ryan "unendorsed" Trump in the last months of campaign. They still rather have a child molester in the Senate, as long as he's a Republican. Moore is going to win due to party identity. Ivey's stance ("I don't disbelief the accusers, but I'll vote Republican anyway") doesn't need further elaboration.

In 1990 Republicans not only disowned David Duke when he advanced to the runoff as a "Republican". They actually worked to prevent his election. Here we just have a "well, we're just looking elsewhere" case.

If David Duke ran today, he'd have the full GOP behind him.

He ran for Senate last year, remember?? And he didn't.

We never saw what would happen if the only choice was between Duke and a Democrat though. He'd probably lose narrowly, since Louisiana isn't as deplorable as Alabama.

Yeah. It's easy to say they wouldn't in a situation where a scary Democrat isn't his only oponent.

No prominent Republican is going to endorse an actual neo-Nazi.

People were saying that about the President and a child molester I'm sure. But everyone wants to keep giving the modern GOP the benefit of the doubt for some reason.

Which senators have endorsed Moore.

[HillGoose]

Dude the President of the United States just held a rally for a child molester. Stop acting like your party has any credibility whatsoever on morality. The NRSC is just maintaining this position just because Trump is covering for them.

Trump isnt an establishment Republican , and the RNC is the president's puppet. The Establishment still represents the GOP more than the Trump win do and thats a good thing.

Yes. The President is not establishment. Oh my God I get stupider on Atlas.

No Paul Ryan is Establishment, and the politicians supported by top GOP congressional leaders and GOP donors during the the primaries are the Establishment.


Bernie Sanders wouldnt be part of the establishment either if he won and neither is Trump.

There needs to be a "like" button on here real bad