https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/unidentified-flying-object-navy.html
The NYT's article specifically dedicated to the incident with the two pilots is absolutely insane, there's so much corroboratinq evidence. The pilots were directed to the location of the UFO by a US Navy cruiser who had been observinq it on radar maneuverinq and chanqinq speed at impossible rates. The pilots saw it firsthand and watched it do exactly the thinqs that were recorded on radar.
honestly, what's the skeptic's explanation for all of this?
How about one of the explanations that are offered in your article?
That’s not actually an explanation. That’s barely a coherent thought.
