Swedish election, 2018: Political Impasse, Löfven loses confidence vote

[reciprocity]

MP 79%
V 74%
FI 67%
S 65%
SD 36%
KD 32%
C 31%
M 29%
L 28%


I guess when you say high speed rail investment is a priority, you get the Greens as #1.

[reciprocity]

MIGRANTS VOTE AGAINST ANTI-MIGRANT PARTY SHOCKER

C and L are just as pro-immigration as the left but they still don't get migrant votes.

The average voter is low-information as it is anywhere, and that's undoubtably higher in areas where many people don't even speak Swedish. They know which party gives them benefits, so that's who they vote for.

Other issues that often drive voters to the left, such as social progressivism and environmentalism almost certainly play no role in how these areas vote, or Islamic fundamentalists wouldn't be supporting pro-LGBT parties. For example, the migrant neighborhoods in Australia voted against gay marriage, but still voted for Labor

Does your low-information voter analysis also reach to poor voters who voted in the 2016 presidential election for someone whose businesses even now continue to hire workers from abroad because of lower labour costs?

[reciprocity]

MIGRANTS VOTE AGAINST ANTI-MIGRANT PARTY SHOCKER

C and L are just as pro-immigration as the left but they still don't get migrant votes.

The average voter is low-information as it is anywhere, and that's undoubtably higher in areas where many people don't even speak Swedish. They know which party gives them benefits, so that's who they vote for.

Other issues that often drive voters to the left, such as social progressivism and environmentalism almost certainly play no role in how these areas vote, or Islamic fundamentalists wouldn't be supporting pro-LGBT parties. For example, the migrant neighborhoods in Australia voted against gay marriage, but still voted for Labor

Does your low-information voter analysis also reach to poor voters who voted in the 2016 presidential election for someone whose businesses even now continue to hire workers from abroad because of lower labour costs?

Trump companies do what's profitable? Oh, the horror! If you think companies undercutting Americans with foreign workers is bad, then you should logically have supported Trump's campaign promises on immigration, which, had Paul Ryan not shot them down to focus on tax cuts for his donors, would have forced corporations (including Trump's) to pay a better wage.

Anyway, back to Sweden.

So you are saying the Trump is hypocrite? OK then. Businesses do not have to use foreign labour... they can if they want to decide who they hire. If Trump was so heartbroken, he would take the hit and hire Americans instead but he doesn't.