Pacific Legislature Official Thread

[AkSaber]

No on both.

[AkSaber]

1. No
2. No
3. Aye

[AkSaber]

Aye.

[AkSaber]

Nay.

[AkSaber]

For the Protection of Commerce in Arms Bill, what does the phrase mean, "The seller negligently supplies the product to a person whom he knows, or reasonably should know, is likely to use said product in an unlawful manner involving unreasonable risk to others?" I'm wondering how would it be interperated.

[AkSaber]

For the Protection of Commerce in Arms Bill, what does the phrase mean, "The seller negligently supplies the product to a person whom he knows, or reasonably should know, is likely to use said product in an unlawful manner involving unreasonable risk to others?" I'm wondering how would it be interperated.

You'll  be the one interpeting it, of course.  You're our chief judicial officer.

Have you taken the oath yet, btw?

Really? Cool!!

Nope, no oath yet.

Perhaps my former region will forgive me for interfering, but to clarify the meaning:

There is no way to determine whether a person actually knows or does not know something. If someone who is obviously insane (for example) wants to buy a gun, the store owner can claim that he does not actually "know" whether the individual is sane or not. However, if the person purchasing the gun shows obvious signs of delusion, then the store owner "reasonably should know" that he is not sane. The same line of reasoning applies when the purchaser is a young child, for example.

Oh oh oh oh oh. So it basically covers someone who is prohibited by law from buying a gun. Ok then. Thank you!!


Aye on both.

[AkSaber]

For the Protection of Commerce in Arms Bill, what does the phrase mean, "The seller negligently supplies the product to a person whom he knows, or reasonably should know, is likely to use said product in an unlawful manner involving unreasonable risk to others?" I'm wondering how would it be interperated.

You'll  be the one interpeting it, of course.  You're our chief judicial officer.

Have you taken the oath yet, btw?

Really? Cool!!

Nope, no oath yet.

Lt. Governor is Chief Judicial Officer, so yeah.  Head on over to the government board and find the "Swearing in of New Office Holders" thread and take the oath.

Neat!! Thank you very much!

[AkSaber]

1. Aye
2. Aye
3. Aye
4. Aye

[AkSaber]

Aye

[AkSaber]

Aye

[AkSaber]

Aye

[AkSaber]

Amendment to Abolish Chief Justice of the Pacific Region - Aye

Bestality Criminalisation Act - Aye