SB 2018-154: Atlasian Drone Regulation Act of 2018 (Passed)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:18:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 2018-154: Atlasian Drone Regulation Act of 2018 (Passed)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: SB 2018-154: Atlasian Drone Regulation Act of 2018 (Passed)  (Read 1621 times)
PPT Spiral
Spiral
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,533
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 21, 2018, 09:23:13 PM »
« edited: March 20, 2018, 09:55:22 PM by Princeps Senatus Lumine »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: Haslam2020
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2018, 11:13:08 PM »

This is a clearly needed bill to protect Atlasia.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2018, 11:49:21 PM »

I can’t support this bill in its current form.

Section 3 in particular is very troubling. The police usually employ drones to track suspects while in hot pursuit. There’s no time to get a warrant while the police is actively tracking someone fleeing the scene of a crime. This bill wouldn’t allow the police to do that.

Section 1 would stop our military from flying drones from bases to and from training areas, between bases, and, more troubing, from non-coastal bases to war zones.
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2018, 02:44:38 AM »

I can’t support this bill in its current form.

Section 3 in particular is very troubling. The police usually employ drones to track suspects while in hot pursuit. There’s no time to get a warrant while the police is actively tracking someone fleeing the scene of a crime. This bill wouldn’t allow the police to do that.

Section 1 would stop our military from flying drones from bases to and from training areas, between bases, and, more troubing, from non-coastal bases to war zones.

I’m willing to amend section 3 to “Police do not have the right to conduct surveillance on the Atlasian people with drones unless a warrant is given to target a specific person.

And section 1 would stop the military drones from flying in our neighborhoods, from scaring our children
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2018, 08:18:55 PM »

I can only agree to Section 2. I think sections 1 and 3 are so bad that they are beyond amending.
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2018, 08:30:48 PM »

I’d like to see more debate on this. I’m willing to amend Section 3 to what I previously stated, Section 1 is specifically designed to make sure unknowing government surivellence doesn’t happen to Atlasian citizens.
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2018, 11:26:11 PM »

I am proposing a new amendment:

Atlasian Drone Regulation Act ot 2018 Amendment:

1. Any Atlasian military drone can not fly over a residential neighborhood, or small town or city. (Unless such scenarios as an traveling to a military base,invasion or ground war on our soil.)
2. Any Atlasian military drone used for the monitoring of Atlasian citizens is made illegal without a warrant.
3. Police do not have the right to use drones to track citizens unless a specific warrant is given.

I’m positive this is necessary for Atlasia.

Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2018, 02:54:35 AM »

Opinions?
Logged
At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder
LouisvilleThunder
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,905
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: 1.74

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2018, 04:41:15 PM »
« Edited: February 24, 2018, 11:09:38 AM by Senator LouisvilleThunder »

I suggest amending this bill to have a minimum altitude that drones can fly over residential areas as well as allowing police with a reasonable cause to fly the drones lower if needed to pursue a criminal.
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2018, 10:32:44 AM »

I am proposing a new amendment:

Atlasian Drone Regulation Act ot 2018 Amendment:

1. Any Atlasian military drone can not fly over a residential neighborhood, or small town or city. (Unless such scenarios as an traveling to a military base,invasion or ground war on our soil. They must be at at least 400 feet high, though.)
2. Any Atlasian military drone used for the monitoring of Atlasian citizens is made illegal without a warrant.
3. Police do not have the right to use drones to track citizens unless a specific warrant is given, but are allowed to pursuit criminals in case of emergency.

I’m positive this is necessary for Atlasia.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 24, 2018, 09:49:41 PM »

Senators have approx. 12 hours to object to Senator Haslam's new amendment.
Logged
Anna Komnene
Siren
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,654


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2018, 02:58:53 PM »

The amendment is adopted.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2018, 08:08:36 PM »

Where do we stand on this, Senators?

I myself must echo the concerns of Senator Cinyc. I'm all for being responsible with sensible matters such as drones, but this seems excessive regulation of the matter and a bit impractical as well. So in that sense, I don't see myself supporting it despite having considered potential amendments.
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,103
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 09, 2018, 09:00:47 PM »

I'm of the belief that this bill as a whole is overregulation of the Military, HOWEVER, I would support section two if it were it's own separate bill, and would be willing to sponsor said bill.  I believe the Military has no right to spy on the Citizens of Atlasia, and The Privacy of Citizens must be protected.
Logged
At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder
LouisvilleThunder
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,905
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: 1.74

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2018, 10:03:47 PM »
« Edited: March 10, 2018, 04:14:27 PM by Senator LouisvilleThunder »

Amendment S11:04
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2018, 10:06:03 PM »

An amendment has been offered, sponsor?
Logged
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,033
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2018, 10:52:15 PM »

I'll sponsor this amendment.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 09, 2018, 10:56:36 PM »


Sorry, I mean whether the sponsor of this bill (Haslam) considers it friendly or hostile.
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 10, 2018, 03:31:28 PM »

I approve. Let’s get this passed!
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 10, 2018, 03:41:29 PM »


Amendment judged as friendly, 24 hours for objections.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 11, 2018, 05:01:15 PM »

Amendment adopted.

Myself I still feel retaining Section 1 to be excessive, but I would strongly support the bill if contained to Section 2.

I'd like to offer the following amendment:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,033
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 11, 2018, 06:12:09 PM »

The amendment is fine by me.
Logged
Former Senator Haslam2020
Haslam2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,345
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 11, 2018, 07:52:13 PM »

The one that’s left is the one I most strongly wanted. I’m okay with it.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 11, 2018, 07:56:53 PM »

Amendment judged friendly, 24 hours for objections.
Logged
_
Not_Madigan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,103
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: March 11, 2018, 08:09:25 PM »

If it's just Section 2 of the bill, I'll gladly support it!
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.