HB 1192: Nonpartisan Judiciary Amendment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 11:03:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  HB 1192: Nonpartisan Judiciary Amendment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: HB 1192: Nonpartisan Judiciary Amendment  (Read 931 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,847
United Kingdom


« on: February 28, 2018, 09:11:26 AM »

I just would like to say it is unnecessary. There are no Justices that are right now politically active and it might encourage them to be even less active. Additionnally, it wouldn't even bar them from having a party role as often those who de facto lead aren't Chairman/Vice-Chairman (for example Griffin/Windjammer in the 2014-2015)

I echo this. The roles of 'officers' in parties are fairly redundant, and frankly if the parties really wanted to get around this, then they could- either through not being the de-facto leader, or through creating other roles.

There are people who are party chairs who I would trust to be on the court, and would trust their judgement/skills, and there are people who have never served as party chairs who I'd question being on the court.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.