White House to change clearance process:
why, for the love of whatever god you pray to, isn't this standard funking practice?
should that be "had" if the paragraph above it is true? I guess "has" may be acceptable, but "had" seems more accurate. Assuming I'm reading everything else right? Do I have the time line right....he didn't have SCI for the first year, but now he does? Or is his SCI only temporary? I'm pretty sure you can't get a "temporary" SCI clearance, you either have it, or you do not. I think you can have a time expired one and be under a re-investigation and be ok, but not if it's your first one (they go deep on the first one).
(and not all threads at Atlas get read by an actual somebody "somewhere", but I'd guess if any of them are, this is one of them
hi fellas, enjoy your day!)