White House security clearance problems megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:28:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  White House security clearance problems megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: White House security clearance problems megathread  (Read 689 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,698


« on: February 14, 2018, 01:05:19 PM »
« edited: February 14, 2018, 09:24:37 PM by GeorgiaModerate »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,698


« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2018, 09:25:05 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,698


« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2018, 09:44:07 PM »

Here's the NBC story on the large number of staffers with interim clearances: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/scores-top-white-house-officials-lack-permanent-security-clearances-n848191.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,698


« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2018, 09:15:00 AM »

White House to change clearance process:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,698


« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2018, 09:16:59 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,698


« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2018, 10:57:37 AM »

White House to change clearance process:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
why, for the love of whatever god you pray to, isn't this standard funking practice?

should that be "had" if the paragraph above it is true?  I guess "has" may be acceptable, but "had" seems more accurate.  Assuming I'm reading everything else right?  Do I have the time line right....he didn't have SCI for the first year, but now he does?  Or is his SCI only temporary?  I'm pretty sure you can't get a "temporary" SCI clearance, you either have it, or you do not.  I think you can have a time expired one and be under a re-investigation and be ok, but not if it's your first one (they go deep on the first one).


(and not all threads at Atlas get read by an actual somebody "somewhere", but I'd guess if any of them are, this is one of them Wink hi fellas, enjoy your day!)

From other reports, it seems unclear whether Kushner is still operating under a temporary clearance, and if so whether he will be affected by Kelly's new policy.

During my time as a defense contractor (caveat: decades ago), there was no "temporary" clearance; an applicant was simply not allowed access to classified information until their clearance investigation was completed.  It took about two months for my Secret clearance investigation, which was a typical amount of time.  I was later upgraded to Top Secret (not SCI -- there was no intel aspect to my work), and that investigation took about six months.  During that period, I had access to Secret data but not TS.

It wasn't uncommon for people to be denied TS clearances.  Secret was almost always granted in the end; I only knew one person who was denied.  People who were denied or still under investigation were assigned only to unclassified work.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,698


« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2018, 06:12:13 PM »

WaPo reports that two weeks ago, Rosenstein informed McGahn that significant information requiring additional investigation would further delay Kushner's clearance.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/top-justice-dept-official-alerted-white-house-2-weeks-ago-to-ongoing-issues-in-kushners-security-clearance/2018/02/23/aa9b37c8-17f4-11e8-92c9-376b4fe57ff7_story.html
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,698


« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2018, 04:04:49 PM »

All WH aides -- including Jared Kushner -- with interim TS/SCI clearances have been downgraded to Secret clearance: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/27/jared-kushner-security-clearance-downgrade-427178

For those not familiar with the clearance system, there are three general levels: Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret.  There are also additional designations for particular types of material, such as SCI (Sensitive Compartmentalized Information) for very sensitive intelligence-related material and others relating to specific areas such as nuclear weapons design, communications security, etc.  (Caveat: I haven't held a clearance since leaving the defense arena 25 years ago, so my information may be somewhat outdated.)
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,698


« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2018, 06:26:37 PM »

More on Kushner:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.